Honda Brio 1.3 V Hatchback AT (2015) vs Suzuki APV Type II SGX AT (2015)
A full spec-by-spec comparison of Honda Brio 1.3 V Hatchback AT (2015) vs Suzuki APV Type II SGX AT (2015) — engine, performance, dimensions, features and price, with the differences highlighted to help you decide.
| Specification | Honda Brio 1.3 V Hatchback AT (2015) Honda ₱791,000 | Suzuki APV Type II SGX AT (2015) Suzuki ₱820,000 |
|---|---|---|
| Overview | ||
| Model Year | 2015 | 2015 |
| Warranty | 100,000kms/3-years | 100,000km/3-years |
| Availability | Current | Discontinued |
| Engine & Drivetrain | ||
| Engine Type | Inline-4 | Inline-4 |
| Displacement | 1339cc | 1590cc |
| Valvetrain | SOHC 16-valve | SOHC 16-valve |
| Aspiration | Naturally Aspirated, i-VTEC | Naturally Aspirated |
| Fuel Type | Gas | Gas |
| Max Power | 100 PS @ 6000 rpm | 91 PS @ 5750 rpm |
| Max Torque | 127 Nm @ 4800 rpm | 127 Nm @ 4500 rpm |
| Transmission | 5-Speed A/T | 4-Speed A/T |
| Drivetrain | FWD | RWD |
| Performance & Economy | ||
| 0–60 mph | no | — |
| 0–100 km/h | no | — |
| Top Speed | no | — |
| Fuel Economy (City) | 18.27 | — |
| Fuel Economy (Highway) | 20.37 | — |
| Fuel Economy (Combined) | 19.32 | — |
| Emission Standard | Euro4 | — |
| Body & Dimensions | ||
| Body Type | Hatchback | MPV |
| Segment | A | M |
| Construction | Unibody | Body-on-frame |
| Doors | 5 | 5 |
| Seating Capacity | 2+3 | 2+2+3 |
| Length (mm) | 3610 | 4230 |
| Width (mm) | 1680 | 1655 |
| Height (mm) | 1485 | 1855 |
| Wheelbase (mm) | 2345 | 2625 |
| Curb Weight (kg) | 970 | 1300 |
| Fuel Tank (L) | 35 | 46 |
| Chassis, Wheels & Brakes | ||
| Front Suspension | MacPherson w/ Stabilizer | MacPherson |
| Rear Suspension | Torsion Beam | Rigid Axle, Leaf Springs |
| Front Wheels | 14x5 | 14x5.5" Alloys |
| Rear Wheels | 14x5 | 14x5.5" Alloys |
| Front Tires | 175/65 R14 | 185/60 R14 |
| Rear Tires | 175/65 R14 | 185/60 R14 |
| Front Brakes | Disc | Disc |
| Rear Brakes | Drum | Drum |
| Steering Type | EPS | — |
| Steering Column | tilt | tilt |
| Tire Pressure Monitoring | No | No |
| Differential Lock | No | No |
| Safety | ||
| Anti-lock Braking (ABS) | Yes | Yes |
| Electronic Brakeforce Distribution | Yes | Yes |
| Brake Assist | No | No |
| Parking Sensors | No | No |
| Stability Control | No | No |
| Traction Control | No | No |
| Vehicle Dynamic Control | No | No |
| Forward Collision Mitigation | No | No |
| Blind Spot Warning | No | No |
| Hill Start Assist | No | No |
| Hill Descent Control | No | No |
| Auto Stop/Start | No | No |
| Driver Airbag | Yes | Yes |
| Knee Airbag | No | No |
| Passenger Airbag | Yes | Yes |
| Front Curtain Airbags | No | No |
| Rear Curtain Airbags | No | No |
| Rear Side Airbags | No | No |
| Engine Immobilizer | Yes | No |
| Security Alarm | Yes | Yes |
| Door Locking | Central Locking | Central Locking |
| Comfort & Convenience | ||
| Air Conditioning | Manual Aircon | Manual Aircon |
| Rear A/C Vents | Yes | No |
| Seat Material | Fabric | Fabric |
| Parking Brake | Manual | Manual |
| Key Type | Keyless Entry | Keyless Entry |
| Push-Button Start | No | No |
| Cruise Control | No | No |
| Multi-Info Display | No | No |
| Paddle Shifters | No | No |
| Reverse Camera | No | No |
| Auto Headlights | No | No |
| Power Windows | Yes | Yes |
| Power Seats | No | No |
| Remote Trunk Release | No | No |
| Eco Mode | No | No |
| Antenna | no | yes |
| Infotainment & Audio | ||
| Speakers | 4 | 6 |
| Touchscreen | Yes | No |
| Navigation | Yes | No |
| Bluetooth | Yes | No |
| Apple CarPlay | No | No |
| Android Auto | No | No |
| USB | Yes | Yes |
| AUX Input | Yes | Yes |
| AM/FM Radio | Yes | Yes |
| CD Player | Yes | Yes |
| DVD Player | Yes | No |
| MP3 Playback | Yes | Yes |
| iPod Support | Yes | No |
| SD Card Slot | No | No |
| Lighting | ||
| Headlights | Halogen | Halogen |
| Fog Lights | Yes | Yes |
| Daytime Running Lights | No | No |
Honda Brio 1.3 V Hatchback AT (2015) vs Suzuki APV Type II SGX AT (2015): which should you buy?
For a Filipino buyer focused on daily commuting, fuel efficiency and a lower upfront cost, the 2015 Honda Brio 1.3 V Hatchback AT is the clearer choice. Priced at ₱791,000, it is ₱29,000 cheaper than the Suzuki APV Type II SGX AT and offers a higher output of 100 PS versus the APV’s 91 PS, while delivering identical torque (127 Nm) at a slightly higher rpm. The Brio’s 5‑speed automatic is smoother than the APV’s 4‑speed unit, and its front‑wheel‑drive layout suits city streets better than the APV’s rear‑wheel‑drive configuration. Fuel‑economy figures are provided for the Brio (19.32 km/L combined), indicating better mileage than the APV, which lacks published figures. The Brio’s hatchback body is compact and currently available, making parts and service easier, whereas the APV is discontinued, built on a body‑on‑frame platform, and targets the MPV segment with a 2+2+3 seating layout and a longer 4,230 mm wheelbase, which may appeal to buyers needing extra passenger space. However, the APV’s higher price (₱820,000), lower power, and lack of fuel‑economy data make it less attractive for cost‑conscious commuters. Choose the Brio if you prioritize affordability, efficiency, and modern availability; opt for the APV only if you need the additional seating capacity of an MPV and can accept the higher price and older platform.
Frequently asked questions
Which model is cheaper?
The Honda Brio 1.3 V Hatchback AT costs ₱791,000, which is ₱29,000 less than the Suzuki APV Type II SGX AT priced at ₱820,000.
Which vehicle has more power?
The Brio produces 100 PS at 6,000 rpm, while the APV delivers 91 PS at 5,750 rpm, making the Brio the more powerful option.
Is the Brio more fuel‑efficient?
Yes, the Brio’s combined fuel economy is 19.32 km/L (city 18.27 km/L, highway 20.37 km/L); the APV’s fuel‑economy figures are not provided.
Which car is better for carrying more passengers?
The Suzuki APV is an MPV with a 2+2+3 seating arrangement, offering space for up to seven occupants, whereas the Brio is a hatchback with standard seating for five.