Honda Brio 1.3 V Hatchback AT (2015) vs Suzuki APV Type II SGX AT (2015)

A full spec-by-spec comparison of Honda Brio 1.3 V Hatchback AT (2015) vs Suzuki APV Type II SGX AT (2015) — engine, performance, dimensions, features and price, with the differences highlighted to help you decide.

Specification Honda Brio 1.3 V Hatchback AT (2015) Honda ₱791,000 Suzuki APV Type II SGX AT (2015) Suzuki ₱820,000
Overview
Model Year 2015 2015
Warranty 100,000kms/3-years 100,000km/3-years
Availability Current Discontinued
Engine & Drivetrain
Engine Type Inline-4 Inline-4
Displacement 1339cc 1590cc
Valvetrain SOHC 16-valve SOHC 16-valve
Aspiration Naturally Aspirated, i-VTEC Naturally Aspirated
Fuel Type Gas Gas
Max Power 100 PS @ 6000 rpm 91 PS @ 5750 rpm
Max Torque 127 Nm @ 4800 rpm 127 Nm @ 4500 rpm
Transmission 5-Speed A/T 4-Speed A/T
Drivetrain FWD RWD
Performance & Economy
0–60 mph no
0–100 km/h no
Top Speed no
Fuel Economy (City) 18.27
Fuel Economy (Highway) 20.37
Fuel Economy (Combined) 19.32
Emission Standard Euro4
Body & Dimensions
Body Type Hatchback MPV
Segment A M
Construction Unibody Body-on-frame
Doors 5 5
Seating Capacity 2+3 2+2+3
Length (mm) 3610 4230
Width (mm) 1680 1655
Height (mm) 1485 1855
Wheelbase (mm) 2345 2625
Curb Weight (kg) 970 1300
Fuel Tank (L) 35 46
Chassis, Wheels & Brakes
Front Suspension MacPherson w/ Stabilizer MacPherson
Rear Suspension Torsion Beam Rigid Axle, Leaf Springs
Front Wheels 14x5 14x5.5" Alloys
Rear Wheels 14x5 14x5.5" Alloys
Front Tires 175/65 R14 185/60 R14
Rear Tires 175/65 R14 185/60 R14
Front Brakes Disc Disc
Rear Brakes Drum Drum
Steering Type EPS
Steering Column tilt tilt
Tire Pressure Monitoring No No
Differential Lock No No
Safety
Anti-lock Braking (ABS) Yes Yes
Electronic Brakeforce Distribution Yes Yes
Brake Assist No No
Parking Sensors No No
Stability Control No No
Traction Control No No
Vehicle Dynamic Control No No
Forward Collision Mitigation No No
Blind Spot Warning No No
Hill Start Assist No No
Hill Descent Control No No
Auto Stop/Start No No
Driver Airbag Yes Yes
Knee Airbag No No
Passenger Airbag Yes Yes
Front Curtain Airbags No No
Rear Curtain Airbags No No
Rear Side Airbags No No
Engine Immobilizer Yes No
Security Alarm Yes Yes
Door Locking Central Locking Central Locking
Comfort & Convenience
Air Conditioning Manual Aircon Manual Aircon
Rear A/C Vents Yes No
Seat Material Fabric Fabric
Parking Brake Manual Manual
Key Type Keyless Entry Keyless Entry
Push-Button Start No No
Cruise Control No No
Multi-Info Display No No
Paddle Shifters No No
Reverse Camera No No
Auto Headlights No No
Power Windows Yes Yes
Power Seats No No
Remote Trunk Release No No
Eco Mode No No
Antenna no yes
Infotainment & Audio
Speakers 4 6
Touchscreen Yes No
Navigation Yes No
Bluetooth Yes No
Apple CarPlay No No
Android Auto No No
USB Yes Yes
AUX Input Yes Yes
AM/FM Radio Yes Yes
CD Player Yes Yes
DVD Player Yes No
MP3 Playback Yes Yes
iPod Support Yes No
SD Card Slot No No
Lighting
Headlights Halogen Halogen
Fog Lights Yes Yes
Daytime Running Lights No No
Keep comparing Add another model to this matchup — line up to four side by side.

Honda Brio 1.3 V Hatchback AT (2015) vs Suzuki APV Type II SGX AT (2015): which should you buy?

For a Filipino buyer focused on daily commuting, fuel efficiency and a lower upfront cost, the 2015 Honda Brio 1.3 V Hatchback AT is the clearer choice. Priced at ₱791,000, it is ₱29,000 cheaper than the Suzuki APV Type II SGX AT and offers a higher output of 100 PS versus the APV’s 91 PS, while delivering identical torque (127 Nm) at a slightly higher rpm. The Brio’s 5‑speed automatic is smoother than the APV’s 4‑speed unit, and its front‑wheel‑drive layout suits city streets better than the APV’s rear‑wheel‑drive configuration. Fuel‑economy figures are provided for the Brio (19.32 km/L combined), indicating better mileage than the APV, which lacks published figures. The Brio’s hatchback body is compact and currently available, making parts and service easier, whereas the APV is discontinued, built on a body‑on‑frame platform, and targets the MPV segment with a 2+2+3 seating layout and a longer 4,230 mm wheelbase, which may appeal to buyers needing extra passenger space. However, the APV’s higher price (₱820,000), lower power, and lack of fuel‑economy data make it less attractive for cost‑conscious commuters. Choose the Brio if you prioritize affordability, efficiency, and modern availability; opt for the APV only if you need the additional seating capacity of an MPV and can accept the higher price and older platform.

Frequently asked questions

Which model is cheaper?

The Honda Brio 1.3 V Hatchback AT costs ₱791,000, which is ₱29,000 less than the Suzuki APV Type II SGX AT priced at ₱820,000.

Which vehicle has more power?

The Brio produces 100 PS at 6,000 rpm, while the APV delivers 91 PS at 5,750 rpm, making the Brio the more powerful option.

Is the Brio more fuel‑efficient?

Yes, the Brio’s combined fuel economy is 19.32 km/L (city 18.27 km/L, highway 20.37 km/L); the APV’s fuel‑economy figures are not provided.

Which car is better for carrying more passengers?

The Suzuki APV is an MPV with a 2+2+3 seating arrangement, offering space for up to seven occupants, whereas the Brio is a hatchback with standard seating for five.