Honda Brio 1.3 V Hatchback AT (2015) vs Suzuki APV Type II GA MT (2015)
A full spec-by-spec comparison of Honda Brio 1.3 V Hatchback AT (2015) vs Suzuki APV Type II GA MT (2015) — engine, performance, dimensions, features and price, with the differences highlighted to help you decide.
| Specification | Honda Brio 1.3 V Hatchback AT (2015) Honda ₱791,000 | Suzuki APV Type II GA MT (2015) Suzuki ₱763,000 |
|---|---|---|
| Overview | ||
| Model Year | 2015 | 2015 |
| Warranty | 100,000kms/3-years | 100,000km/3-years |
| Availability | Current | Current |
| Engine & Drivetrain | ||
| Engine Type | Inline-4 | Inline-4 |
| Displacement | 1339cc | 1590cc |
| Valvetrain | SOHC 16-valve | SOHC 16-valve |
| Aspiration | Naturally Aspirated, i-VTEC | Naturally Aspirated |
| Fuel Type | Gas | Gasoline |
| Max Power | 100 PS @ 6000 rpm | 91 PS @ 5750 rpm |
| Max Torque | 127 Nm @ 4800 rpm | 127 Nm @ 4500 rpm |
| Transmission | 5-Speed A/T | 5-Speed M/T |
| Drivetrain | FWD | RWD |
| Performance & Economy | ||
| 0–60 mph | no | — |
| 0–100 km/h | no | — |
| Top Speed | no | — |
| Fuel Economy (City) | 18.27 | — |
| Fuel Economy (Highway) | 20.37 | — |
| Fuel Economy (Combined) | 19.32 | — |
| Emission Standard | Euro4 | — |
| Body & Dimensions | ||
| Body Type | Hatchback | MPV AUV |
| Segment | A | MPV |
| Construction | Unibody | Body on Frame |
| Doors | 5 | 5 |
| Seating Capacity | 2+3 | 3+3+2 |
| Length (mm) | 3610 | 4155 |
| Width (mm) | 1680 | 1655 |
| Height (mm) | 1485 | 1865 |
| Wheelbase (mm) | 2345 | 2625 |
| Curb Weight (kg) | 970 | 1270 |
| Fuel Tank (L) | 35 | 46 |
| Exterior Colors | — | Burgundy Red Pearl, Superior White, Silky Silver |
| Chassis, Wheels & Brakes | ||
| Front Suspension | MacPherson w/ Stabilizer | MacPherson Strut w/ Coil Spring |
| Rear Suspension | Torsion Beam | Rigid Axle, Leaf Springs |
| Front Wheels | 14x5 | 14 |
| Rear Wheels | 14x5 | 14 |
| Front Tires | 175/65 R14 | 185/60 R14 |
| Rear Tires | 175/65 R14 | 185/60 R14 |
| Front Brakes | Disc | Disc |
| Rear Brakes | Drum | Drum |
| Steering Type | EPS | — |
| Steering Column | tilt | tilt |
| Tire Pressure Monitoring | No | No |
| Differential Lock | No | No |
| Safety | ||
| Anti-lock Braking (ABS) | Yes | No |
| Electronic Brakeforce Distribution | Yes | No |
| Brake Assist | No | No |
| Parking Sensors | No | No |
| Stability Control | No | No |
| Traction Control | No | No |
| Vehicle Dynamic Control | No | No |
| Forward Collision Mitigation | No | No |
| Blind Spot Warning | No | No |
| Hill Start Assist | No | No |
| Hill Descent Control | No | No |
| Auto Stop/Start | No | No |
| Driver Airbag | Yes | No |
| Knee Airbag | No | No |
| Passenger Airbag | Yes | No |
| Front Curtain Airbags | No | No |
| Rear Curtain Airbags | No | No |
| Rear Side Airbags | No | No |
| Engine Immobilizer | Yes | No |
| Security Alarm | Yes | No |
| Door Locking | Central Locking | Standard |
| Comfort & Convenience | ||
| Air Conditioning | Manual Aircon | Manual Aircon |
| Rear A/C Vents | Yes | No |
| Seat Material | Fabric | Fabric |
| Parking Brake | Manual | Manual |
| Key Type | Keyless Entry | Standard Key |
| Push-Button Start | No | No |
| Cruise Control | No | No |
| Multi-Info Display | No | No |
| Paddle Shifters | No | No |
| Reverse Camera | No | No |
| Auto Headlights | No | No |
| Power Windows | Yes | No |
| Power Seats | No | No |
| Remote Trunk Release | No | No |
| Eco Mode | No | No |
| Antenna | no | yes |
| Infotainment & Audio | ||
| Speakers | 4 | 2 |
| Touchscreen | Yes | No |
| Navigation | Yes | No |
| Bluetooth | Yes | No |
| Apple CarPlay | No | No |
| Android Auto | No | No |
| USB | Yes | No |
| AUX Input | Yes | No |
| AM/FM Radio | Yes | Yes |
| CD Player | Yes | Yes |
| DVD Player | Yes | No |
| MP3 Playback | Yes | No |
| iPod Support | Yes | No |
| SD Card Slot | No | No |
| Lighting | ||
| Headlights | Halogen | Halogen |
| Fog Lights | Yes | Yes |
| Daytime Running Lights | No | No |
Honda Brio 1.3 V Hatchback AT (2015) vs Suzuki APV Type II GA MT (2015): which should you buy?
For a Filipino buyer comparing the 2015 Honda Brio 1.3 V Hatchback AT (₱791,000) and the 2015 Suzuki APV Type II GA MT (₱763,000), the choice hinges on primary use. The Brio is a compact hatchback with a more powerful 100 PS engine, automatic transmission, and superior fuel economy (18.27 city/20.37 highway km/L). It's ideal for daily commuting, city driving, and small families needing efficiency and ease of driving. The APV, while cheaper by ₱28,000, has a manual transmission, RWD, and body-on-frame construction suited for heavier loads and rougher roads. Its 91 PS engine is adequate for its purpose, but fuel economy is not listed. The APV seats up to 8 (3+3+2), making it a better choice for large families or cargo hauling, but its manual gearbox and lower power may deter urban drivers. If you prioritize fuel savings, automatic convenience, and modern hatchback agility, choose Brio. If you need maximum passenger and cargo capacity, the APV offers more versatility at a lower price, albeit with older technology.
Frequently asked questions
Which is cheaper?
The Suzuki APV is cheaper at ₱763,000, while the Honda Brio is ₱791,000, a difference of ₱28,000.
Which is more powerful?
The Honda Brio produces 100 PS, higher than the Suzuki APV's 91 PS. Torque is identical at 127 Nm, but the Brio achieves peak torque at 4800 rpm versus the APV's 4500 rpm.
Which is better for a family?
The Suzuki APV seats up to 8 passengers (3+3+2) with body-on-frame construction, making it better for large families or cargo. The Honda Brio seats 5 and is more suited for small families or daily commutes.
Which has better fuel economy?
The Honda Brio has fuel economy figures of 18.27 km/L city and 20.37 km/L highway. The Suzuki APV does not have fuel economy data provided, so the Brio is likely more efficient.