Honda City 1.5 E MT (2015) vs Suzuki APV Type II GA MT (2015)
A full spec-by-spec comparison of Honda City 1.5 E MT (2015) vs Suzuki APV Type II GA MT (2015) — engine, performance, dimensions, features and price, with the differences highlighted to help you decide.
| Specification | Honda City 1.5 E MT (2015) Honda ₱764,000 | Suzuki APV Type II GA MT (2015) Suzuki ₱763,000 |
|---|---|---|
| Overview | ||
| Model Year | 2015 | 2015 |
| Warranty | 100,000kms/3-years | 100,000km/3-years |
| Availability | Discontinued | Current |
| Engine & Drivetrain | ||
| Engine Type | Inline-4 | Inline-4 |
| Displacement | 1496cc | 1590cc |
| Valvetrain | SOHC 16-valve | SOHC 16-valve |
| Aspiration | Naturally Aspirated, i-VTEC | Naturally Aspirated |
| Fuel Type | Gas | Gasoline |
| Max Power | 120 PS @ 6600 rpm | 91 PS @ 5750 rpm |
| Max Torque | 145 Nm @ 4800 rpm | 127 Nm @ 4500 rpm |
| Transmission | 5-Speed M/T | 5-Speed M/T |
| Drivetrain | FWD | RWD |
| Performance & Economy | ||
| 0–60 mph | no | — |
| 0–100 km/h | no | — |
| Top Speed | no | — |
| Fuel Economy (City) | 20.99 | — |
| Fuel Economy (Highway) | 31.03 | — |
| Fuel Economy (Combined) | 26.01 | — |
| Emission Standard | Euro4 | — |
| Body & Dimensions | ||
| Body Type | Sedan | MPV AUV |
| Segment | B | MPV |
| Construction | Unibody | Body on Frame |
| Doors | 4 | 5 |
| Seating Capacity | 2+3 | 3+3+2 |
| Length (mm) | 4440 | 4155 |
| Width (mm) | 1695 | 1655 |
| Height (mm) | 1477 | 1865 |
| Wheelbase (mm) | 2600 | 2625 |
| Curb Weight (kg) | 1074 | 1270 |
| Fuel Tank (L) | 40 | 46 |
| Exterior Colors | — | Burgundy Red Pearl, Superior White, Silky Silver |
| Chassis, Wheels & Brakes | ||
| Front Suspension | Independent MacPherson w/ Stabilizer | MacPherson Strut w/ Coil Spring |
| Rear Suspension | H-Shaped Torsion Beam w/ Stabilizer | Rigid Axle, Leaf Springs |
| Front Wheels | 15x5.5 | 14 |
| Rear Wheels | 15x5.5 | 14 |
| Front Tires | 175/65 R15 | 185/60 R14 |
| Rear Tires | 175/65 R15 | 185/60 R14 |
| Rear Brakes | Drum | Drum |
| Steering Type | EPS | — |
| Steering Column | tilt + tele | tilt |
| Tire Pressure Monitoring | No | No |
| Differential Lock | No | No |
| Front Brakes | — | Disc |
| Safety | ||
| Anti-lock Braking (ABS) | Yes | No |
| Electronic Brakeforce Distribution | Yes | No |
| Brake Assist | No | No |
| Parking Sensors | No | No |
| Stability Control | No | No |
| Traction Control | No | No |
| Vehicle Dynamic Control | No | No |
| Forward Collision Mitigation | No | No |
| Blind Spot Warning | No | No |
| Hill Start Assist | No | No |
| Hill Descent Control | No | No |
| Auto Stop/Start | No | No |
| Driver Airbag | Yes | No |
| Knee Airbag | No | No |
| Passenger Airbag | Yes | No |
| Front Curtain Airbags | No | No |
| Rear Curtain Airbags | No | No |
| Rear Side Airbags | No | No |
| Engine Immobilizer | Yes | No |
| Security Alarm | Yes | No |
| Door Locking | Central Locking | Standard |
| Comfort & Convenience | ||
| Air Conditioning | Manual Aircon | Manual Aircon |
| Rear A/C Vents | Yes | No |
| Seat Material | Fabric | Fabric |
| Parking Brake | Manual | Manual |
| Key Type | Keyless Entry | Standard Key |
| Push-Button Start | No | No |
| Cruise Control | No | No |
| Multi-Info Display | Yes | No |
| Paddle Shifters | No | No |
| Reverse Camera | No | No |
| Auto Headlights | No | No |
| Power Windows | Yes | No |
| Power Seats | No | No |
| Remote Trunk Release | No | No |
| Eco Mode | No | No |
| Antenna | no | yes |
| Infotainment & Audio | ||
| Speakers | 4 | 2 |
| Touchscreen | No | No |
| Navigation | No | No |
| Bluetooth | Yes | No |
| Apple CarPlay | No | No |
| Android Auto | No | No |
| USB | Yes | No |
| AUX Input | Yes | No |
| AM/FM Radio | Yes | Yes |
| CD Player | Yes | Yes |
| DVD Player | No | No |
| MP3 Playback | Yes | No |
| iPod Support | Yes | No |
| SD Card Slot | No | No |
| Lighting | ||
| Headlights | Multi-Reflector Halogen | Halogen |
| Fog Lights | Yes | Yes |
| Daytime Running Lights | No | No |
Honda City 1.5 E MT (2015) vs Suzuki APV Type II GA MT (2015): which should you buy?
For a Filipino buyer comparing the Honda City 1.5 E MT and Suzuki APV Type II GA MT (both 2015, around ₱764k), the choice hinges on lifestyle: daily commuting vs. family/utility. The City is a discontinued sedan with a 1.5L i-VTEC engine producing 120 PS and 145 Nm, paired with a 5-speed manual and FWD. It offers superior fuel economy (20.99 km/L city, 31.03 highway) and more power, making it ideal for city driving and highway trips. In contrast, the APV is a current model with a 1.6L engine (91 PS, 127 Nm), RWD, and body-on-frame construction, seating up to 8 in a 3+3+2 configuration. It is less powerful and less fuel-efficient (data not provided), but excels in hauling passengers and cargo, and is better suited for rough roads. If you prioritize fuel savings, driving dynamics, and sedan practicality, choose the Honda City. If you need a rugged, spacious family vehicle for large groups or occasional off-road use, the Suzuki APV remains a viable choice despite its age. Note that City is discontinued, so availability is limited to second-hand units with possible warranty issues, while the APV is still in production with warranty support.
Frequently asked questions
Which is cheaper: Honda City or Suzuki APV?
Prices are nearly identical: the Honda City 1.5 E MT is ₱764,000, while the Suzuki APV Type II GA MT is ₱763,000. However, the City is discontinued, so second-hand prices may vary, whereas the APV is still in production with a fixed price.
Which vehicle has more power?
The Honda City is significantly more powerful with 120 PS and 145 Nm, compared to the Suzuki APV's 91 PS and 127 Nm. The City also has a higher-revving engine (6600 rpm max power) and i-VTEC technology.
Which is better for a large family?
The Suzuki APV is better for large families because it seats up to 8 passengers (3+3+2) and has a body-on-frame construction for durability. The Honda City is a 5-seater sedan, less spacious for multiple passengers.
Which vehicle has better fuel economy?
The Honda City has better fuel economy: 20.99 km/L in the city and 31.03 km/L on the highway. Fuel economy data for the Suzuki APV is not provided, but its larger, less efficient engine and heavier body-on-frame design likely consume more fuel.