Honda Civic 1.8 E AT (2015) vs Nissan NV350 Urvan Cargo (2015)
A full spec-by-spec comparison of Honda Civic 1.8 E AT (2015) vs Nissan NV350 Urvan Cargo (2015) — engine, performance, dimensions, features and price, with the differences highlighted to help you decide.
| Specification | Honda Civic 1.8 E AT (2015) Honda ₱1,088,000 | Nissan NV350 Urvan Cargo (2015) Nissan ₱1,158,000 |
|---|---|---|
| Overview | ||
| Model Year | 2015 | 2015 |
| Warranty | 100,000kms/3-years | 100,000km/3-years |
| Availability | Discontinued | Discontinued |
| Engine & Drivetrain | ||
| Engine Type | Inline-4 | Inline-4 |
| Displacement | 1798cc | 2488cc |
| Valvetrain | DOHC 16-valve | DOHC 16-valve |
| Aspiration | Naturally Aspirated | Variable Turbocharger (VGS) |
| Fuel Type | Gas | Diesel |
| Max Power | 141 PS @ 6500 rpm | 129 PS @ 3200 rpm |
| Max Torque | 173 Nm @ 4300 rpm | 356 Nm @ 1400-2000 rpm |
| Transmission | 5-Speed A/T | 5-Speed M/T (Dash-Mounted) |
| Drivetrain | FWD | — |
| Body & Dimensions | ||
| Body Type | Sedan | Van |
| Segment | C | M |
| Construction | Unibody | — |
| Doors | 4 | 4 |
| Seating Capacity | 2+3 | 3 |
| Length (mm) | 4525 | 5080 |
| Width (mm) | 1755 | 1695 |
| Height (mm) | 1430 | 2285 |
| Wheelbase (mm) | 2670 | 2940 |
| Curb Weight (kg) | 1237 | 1825 |
| Fuel Tank (L) | — | 65 |
| Chassis, Wheels & Brakes | ||
| Front Suspension | Independent MacPherson w/ Stabilizer | Torsion Bar with Front Stabilizer |
| Rear Suspension | Double Wishbone w/ Stabilizer | Leaf Spring |
| Front Wheels | 16x6.0" Alloys | 15 |
| Rear Wheels | 16x6.0" Alloys | 15 |
| Front Tires | 205/55 R16 | 195/80R15LT |
| Rear Tires | 205/55 R16 | 195/80R15LT |
| Front Brakes | Disc | — |
| Rear Brakes | Disc | Drum |
| Steering Type | Hydraulic | Power Steering |
| Steering Column | tilt | Manual Tilt |
| Tire Pressure Monitoring | No | No |
| Differential Lock | No | No |
| Safety | ||
| Anti-lock Braking (ABS) | Yes | No |
| Electronic Brakeforce Distribution | Yes | No |
| Brake Assist | No | No |
| Parking Sensors | No | No |
| Stability Control | No | No |
| Traction Control | No | No |
| Vehicle Dynamic Control | No | No |
| Forward Collision Mitigation | No | No |
| Blind Spot Warning | No | No |
| Hill Start Assist | No | No |
| Hill Descent Control | No | No |
| Auto Stop/Start | No | No |
| Driver Airbag | Yes | Yes |
| Knee Airbag | No | No |
| Passenger Airbag | Yes | No |
| Front Curtain Airbags | No | No |
| Rear Curtain Airbags | No | No |
| Rear Side Airbags | No | No |
| Engine Immobilizer | Yes | No |
| Security Alarm | Yes | No |
| Door Locking | Central Locking | Standard |
| Comfort & Convenience | ||
| Air Conditioning | Manual Aircon | Manual, Dial Type |
| Seat Material | Fabric | Fabric |
| Parking Brake | Manual | Manual |
| Key Type | keyless Entry | Manual |
| Push-Button Start | Yes | No |
| Cruise Control | Yes | No |
| Multi-Info Display | Yes | No |
| Paddle Shifters | No | No |
| Reverse Camera | Yes | No |
| Auto Headlights | Yes | No |
| Power Windows | Yes | Yes |
| Power Seats | No | No |
| Remote Trunk Release | No | No |
| Eco Mode | Yes | No |
| Antenna | yes | yes |
| Rear A/C Vents | — | Yes |
| Infotainment & Audio | ||
| Speakers | 6 | 2 |
| Touchscreen | Yes | No |
| Navigation | No | No |
| Bluetooth | No | No |
| Apple CarPlay | No | No |
| Android Auto | No | No |
| USB | Yes | No |
| AUX Input | Yes | No |
| AM/FM Radio | Yes | No |
| CD Player | Yes | No |
| DVD Player | Yes | No |
| MP3 Playback | Yes | No |
| iPod Support | No | No |
| SD Card Slot | No | No |
| Lighting | ||
| Headlights | Halogen | Halogen |
| Fog Lights | Yes | Yes |
| Daytime Running Lights | No | No |
Honda Civic 1.8 E AT (2015) vs Nissan NV350 Urvan Cargo (2015): which should you buy?
The Honda Civic 1.8 E AT (2015) is the better daily commuter, priced at ₱1,088,000 with 141 PS of power and a 5-speed automatic transmission. The Nissan NV350 Urvan Cargo (2015) costs ₱1,158,000 and is geared toward heavy-duty work, offering 129 PS and a diesel engine with a 5-speed manual transmission. For Filipino buyers prioritizing fuel efficiency and practicality, the Civic wins. Its naturally aspirated 1798cc engine delivers 173 Nm of torque, while the NV350’s 356 Nm comes from a turbocharger. The Civic’s sedan design and four-door layout suit urban use, whereas the van’s 5080mm length and 3-seat capacity emphasize cargo capacity. Both have identical 100,000km/3-year warranties, but the Civic is cheaper and more agile for city driving.