Honda Civic 2.0 EL AT (2015) vs Ford Ranger XLT 2.2L 4×2 MT (2017)
A full spec-by-spec comparison of Honda Civic 2.0 EL AT (2015) vs Ford Ranger XLT 2.2L 4×2 MT (2017) — engine, performance, dimensions, features and price, with the differences highlighted to help you decide.
| Specification | Honda Civic 2.0 EL AT (2015) Honda ₱1,268,000 | Ford Ranger XLT 2.2L 4×2 MT (2017) Ford ₱1,219,000 |
|---|---|---|
| Overview | ||
| Model Year | 2015 | 2017 |
| Warranty | 100,000kms/3-years | 100,000km/3-years |
| Availability | Discontinued | Discontinued |
| Engine & Drivetrain | ||
| Engine Type | Inline-4 | Inline-4 |
| Displacement | 1997cc | 2198cc |
| Valvetrain | DOHC 16-valve | DOHC 16-valve |
| Aspiration | Naturally Aspirated | Turbocharged |
| Fuel Type | Gas | Diesel |
| Max Power | 155 PS @ 6500 rpm | 160 PS @ 3200 rpm |
| Max Torque | 190 Nm @ 4300 rpm | 385 Nm @ 1600-2500 rpm |
| Transmission | 5-Speed A/T | 6-Speed M/T |
| Drivetrain | FWD | RWD |
| Body & Dimensions | ||
| Body Type | Sedan | Pick Up |
| Segment | C | Pick-Up |
| Construction | Unibody | Body On Frame |
| Doors | 4 | 4 |
| Seating Capacity | 2+3 | 2+3 |
| Length (mm) | 4525 | 5277 |
| Width (mm) | 1755 | 2163 |
| Height (mm) | 1430 | 1821 |
| Wheelbase (mm) | 2670 | 3220 |
| Curb Weight (kg) | 1272 | — |
| Fuel Tank (L) | — | 80 |
| Chassis, Wheels & Brakes | ||
| Front Suspension | Independent MacPherson w/ Stabilizer | Double Wishbone with Coil Spring |
| Rear Suspension | Double Wishbone w/ Stabilizer | Leaf Spring |
| Front Wheels | 17x7" Alloys | 17" Alloys |
| Rear Wheels | 17x7" Alloys | 17" Alloys |
| Front Tires | 215/45 R17 | 265/65 R17 |
| Rear Tires | 215/45 R17 | 265/65 R17 |
| Front Brakes | Disc | Disc |
| Rear Brakes | Disc | Drum |
| Steering Type | Hydraulic | EPS |
| Steering Column | tilt | — |
| Tire Pressure Monitoring | No | No |
| Differential Lock | No | No |
| Safety | ||
| Anti-lock Braking (ABS) | Yes | Yes |
| Electronic Brakeforce Distribution | No | Yes |
| Brake Assist | No | No |
| Parking Sensors | No | No |
| Stability Control | Yes | Yes |
| Traction Control | Yes | Yes |
| Vehicle Dynamic Control | No | No |
| Forward Collision Mitigation | No | No |
| Blind Spot Warning | No | No |
| Hill Start Assist | No | Yes |
| Hill Descent Control | No | Yes |
| Auto Stop/Start | No | No |
| Driver Airbag | Yes | Yes |
| Knee Airbag | No | Yes |
| Passenger Airbag | Yes | Yes |
| Front Curtain Airbags | Yes | No |
| Rear Curtain Airbags | Yes | No |
| Rear Side Airbags | Yes | No |
| Engine Immobilizer | Yes | No |
| Security Alarm | Yes | Yes |
| Door Locking | Central Locking | Central Locking |
| Comfort & Convenience | ||
| Air Conditioning | Automatic Type | Single Zone Automatic |
| Seat Material | Leather | Fabric |
| Parking Brake | EPB | Manual |
| Key Type | keyless Entry | Keyless Entry |
| Push-Button Start | Yes | No |
| Cruise Control | Yes | Yes |
| Multi-Info Display | Yes | No |
| Paddle Shifters | No | No |
| Reverse Camera | Yes | No |
| Auto Headlights | Yes | No |
| Power Windows | Yes | Yes |
| Power Seats | No | Yes |
| Remote Trunk Release | No | No |
| Eco Mode | Yes | No |
| Antenna | yes | yes |
| Rear A/C Vents | — | No |
| Infotainment & Audio | ||
| Speakers | 6 | 6 |
| Touchscreen | Yes | No |
| Navigation | No | No |
| Bluetooth | No | No |
| Apple CarPlay | No | No |
| Android Auto | No | No |
| USB | Yes | Yes |
| AUX Input | Yes | Yes |
| AM/FM Radio | Yes | Yes |
| CD Player | Yes | Yes |
| DVD Player | Yes | No |
| MP3 Playback | Yes | Yes |
| iPod Support | No | Yes |
| SD Card Slot | No | No |
| Lighting | ||
| Headlights | Projector Type HID | Halogen |
| Fog Lights | Yes | Yes |
| Daytime Running Lights | No | No |
Honda Civic 2.0 EL AT (2015) vs Ford Ranger XLT 2.2L 4×2 MT (2017): which should you buy?
The Honda Civic 2.0 EL AT (2015) is the better choice for most Filipino buyers prioritizing daily reliability and fuel efficiency. At ₱1,268,000, it’s ₱49,000 pricier than the Ford Ranger XLT 2.2L 4×2 MT (2017) at ₱1,219,000, yet it delivers 155 PS vs. 160 PS but with a naturally aspirated engine that's easier on the wallet. Both have 4 doors and seat 2+3, but the Civic’s FWD drivetrain and 4525 mm length make it more suited for city driving and practicality, while the Ranger’s RWD, 5277 mm length, and 385 Nm torque are optimized for heavier loads. With identical 100,000 km/3-year warranties, the Civic’s lower cost and simpler powertrain make it ideal for budget-conscious commuters, whereas the Ranger appeals to those needing off-road capability or towing power. Availability is discontinued for both models, so this comparison reflects current market positioning.
Frequently asked questions
Which is cheaper?
The Ford Ranger XLT 2.2L 4×2 MT (2017) costs ₱1,219,000, ₱49,000 less than the Honda Civic 2.0 EL AT (2015) at ₱1,268,000.
Which has more power?
The Ford Ranger XLT 2.2L 4×2 MT (2017) produces 160 PS, 5 PS more than the Honda Civic 2.0 EL AT (2015) at 155 PS.
Which is better for daily commuting?
The Honda Civic 2.0 EL AT (2015) is better for daily commuting due to its 155 PS engine and FWD drivetrain, suited for city driving.
Which is more powerful overall?
The Ford Ranger XLT 2.2L 4×2 MT (2017) is more powerful overall, with 160 PS vs. 155 PS, but it uses a turbocharged diesel engine.