Honda Civic Modulo 1.8 E AT (White Pearl) (2015) vs Nissan NV350 Urvan Cargo (2015)
A full spec-by-spec comparison of Honda Civic Modulo 1.8 E AT (White Pearl) (2015) vs Nissan NV350 Urvan Cargo (2015) — engine, performance, dimensions, features and price, with the differences highlighted to help you decide.
| Specification | Honda Civic Modulo 1.8 E AT (White Pearl) (2015) Honda ₱1,158,000 | Nissan NV350 Urvan Cargo (2015) Nissan ₱1,158,000 |
|---|---|---|
| Overview | ||
| Model Year | 2015 | 2015 |
| Warranty | 100,000kms/3-years | 100,000km/3-years |
| Availability | Discontinued | Discontinued |
| Engine & Drivetrain | ||
| Engine Type | Inline-4 | Inline-4 |
| Displacement | 1798cc | 2488cc |
| Valvetrain | SOHC 16-valve | DOHC 16-valve |
| Aspiration | Naturally Aspirated, i-VTEC | Variable Turbocharger (VGS) |
| Fuel Type | Gas | Diesel |
| Max Power | 141 PS @ 6500 rpm | 129 PS @ 3200 rpm |
| Max Torque | 174 Nm @ 4300 rpm | 356 Nm @ 1400-2000 rpm |
| Transmission | 5-Speed A/T | 5-Speed M/T (Dash-Mounted) |
| Drivetrain | FWD | — |
| Body & Dimensions | ||
| Body Type | Sedan | Van |
| Segment | C | M |
| Construction | Unibody | — |
| Doors | 4 | 4 |
| Seating Capacity | 2+3 | 3 |
| Length (mm) | 4525 | 5080 |
| Width (mm) | 1755 | 1695 |
| Height (mm) | 1430 | 2285 |
| Wheelbase (mm) | 2670 | 2940 |
| Curb Weight (kg) | 1243 | 1825 |
| Fuel Tank (L) | — | 65 |
| Chassis, Wheels & Brakes | ||
| Front Suspension | MacPherson | Torsion Bar with Front Stabilizer |
| Rear Suspension | Double Wishbone | Leaf Spring |
| Front Wheels | 16x6.5" Alloys | 15 |
| Rear Wheels | 16x6.5" Alloys | 15 |
| Front Tires | 205/55 R16 | 195/80R15LT |
| Rear Tires | 205/55 R16 | 195/80R15LT |
| Front Brakes | Disc | — |
| Rear Brakes | Disc | Drum |
| Steering Type | Hydraulic | Power Steering |
| Steering Column | tilt | Manual Tilt |
| Tire Pressure Monitoring | No | No |
| Differential Lock | No | No |
| Safety | ||
| Anti-lock Braking (ABS) | Yes | No |
| Electronic Brakeforce Distribution | No | No |
| Brake Assist | No | No |
| Parking Sensors | No | No |
| Stability Control | No | No |
| Traction Control | No | No |
| Vehicle Dynamic Control | No | No |
| Forward Collision Mitigation | No | No |
| Blind Spot Warning | No | No |
| Hill Start Assist | No | No |
| Hill Descent Control | No | No |
| Auto Stop/Start | No | No |
| Driver Airbag | Yes | Yes |
| Knee Airbag | No | No |
| Passenger Airbag | Yes | No |
| Front Curtain Airbags | No | No |
| Rear Curtain Airbags | No | No |
| Rear Side Airbags | No | No |
| Engine Immobilizer | Yes | No |
| Security Alarm | Yes | No |
| Door Locking | Central Locking | Standard |
| Comfort & Convenience | ||
| Air Conditioning | Manual Aircon | Manual, Dial Type |
| Seat Material | Fabric | Fabric |
| Parking Brake | Manual | Manual |
| Key Type | keyless Entry | Manual |
| Push-Button Start | Yes | No |
| Cruise Control | Yes | No |
| Multi-Info Display | Yes | No |
| Paddle Shifters | No | No |
| Reverse Camera | Yes | No |
| Auto Headlights | Yes | No |
| Power Windows | Yes | Yes |
| Power Seats | No | No |
| Remote Trunk Release | No | No |
| Eco Mode | Yes | No |
| Antenna | yes | yes |
| Rear A/C Vents | — | Yes |
| Infotainment & Audio | ||
| Speakers | 6 | 2 |
| Touchscreen | Yes | No |
| Navigation | No | No |
| Bluetooth | No | No |
| Apple CarPlay | No | No |
| Android Auto | No | No |
| USB | Yes | No |
| AUX Input | Yes | No |
| AM/FM Radio | Yes | No |
| CD Player | Yes | No |
| DVD Player | Yes | No |
| MP3 Playback | Yes | No |
| iPod Support | No | No |
| SD Card Slot | No | No |
| Lighting | ||
| Headlights | Halogen | Halogen |
| Fog Lights | Yes | Yes |
| Daytime Running Lights | No | No |
Honda Civic Modulo 1.8 E AT (White Pearl) (2015) vs Nissan NV350 Urvan Cargo (2015): which should you buy?
Both vehicles are priced identically at ₱1,158,000 and share a 100,000km/3-year warranty, but they serve fundamentally different needs. The Honda Civic Modulo 1.8 E AT (2015) is a sedan (2+3 seats) built for comfort and daily driving, while the Nissan NV350 Urvan Cargo (2015) is a van (3 seats) optimized for cargo. The Civic offers 141 PS of power versus 129 PS in the NV350, and its naturally aspirated, i-VTEC engine contrasts with the NV350’s turbo-diesel VGS system. For a Filipino buyer prioritizing everyday reliability and interior space, the Civic is the clearer choice. If you need to transport goods regularly, the NV350’s higher torque (356 Nm vs 174 Nm) and cargo-focused design justify the trade-off for power and practicality. Given the discontinued status of both models, consider aftermarket support and resale value in your decision.