Honda CR-V 2.0 V MT (2015) vs Ford Ranger XLT 2.2L 4×2 MT (2017)
A full spec-by-spec comparison of Honda CR-V 2.0 V MT (2015) vs Ford Ranger XLT 2.2L 4×2 MT (2017) — engine, performance, dimensions, features and price, with the differences highlighted to help you decide.
| Specification | Honda CR-V 2.0 V MT (2015) Honda ₱1,333,000 | Ford Ranger XLT 2.2L 4×2 MT (2017) Ford ₱1,219,000 |
|---|---|---|
| Overview | ||
| Model Year | 2015 | 2017 |
| Warranty | 100,000kms/3-years | 100,000km/3-years |
| Availability | Discontinued | Discontinued |
| Engine & Drivetrain | ||
| Engine Type | Inline-4 | Inline-4 |
| Displacement | 1997cc | 2198cc |
| Valvetrain | SOHC 16-valve | DOHC 16-valve |
| Aspiration | Naturally Aspirated, i-VTEC | Turbocharged |
| Fuel Type | Gas | Diesel |
| Max Power | 153 PS @ 6500 rpm | 160 PS @ 3200 rpm |
| Max Torque | 190 Nm @ 4300 rpm | 385 Nm @ 1600-2500 rpm |
| Transmission | 6-Speed M/T | 6-Speed M/T |
| Drivetrain | FWD | RWD |
| Performance & Economy | ||
| 0–60 mph | no | — |
| 0–100 km/h | no | — |
| Top Speed | no | — |
| Fuel Economy (City) | no | — |
| Fuel Economy (Highway) | no | — |
| Fuel Economy (Combined) | no | — |
| Emission Standard | Euro4 | — |
| Body & Dimensions | ||
| Body Type | SUV | Pick Up |
| Segment | J | Pick-Up |
| Construction | Unibody | Body On Frame |
| Doors | 5 | 4 |
| Seating Capacity | 2+3 | 2+3 |
| Length (mm) | 4582 | 5277 |
| Width (mm) | 1820 | 2163 |
| Height (mm) | 1685 | 1821 |
| Wheelbase (mm) | 2620 | 3220 |
| Curb Weight (kg) | 1416 | — |
| Fuel Tank (L) | 58 | 80 |
| Chassis, Wheels & Brakes | ||
| Front Suspension | MacPherson w/ Stabilizer | Double Wishbone with Coil Spring |
| Rear Suspension | Double Wishbone w/ Stabilizer | Leaf Spring |
| Front Wheels | 17x7 | 17" Alloys |
| Rear Wheels | 17x7 | 17" Alloys |
| Front Tires | 225/65 R17 | 265/65 R17 |
| Rear Tires | 225/65 R17 | 265/65 R17 |
| Front Brakes | Disc | Disc |
| Rear Brakes | Disc | Drum |
| Steering Type | EPS | EPS |
| Steering Column | tilt + tele | — |
| Tire Pressure Monitoring | No | No |
| Differential Lock | No | No |
| Safety | ||
| Anti-lock Braking (ABS) | Yes | Yes |
| Electronic Brakeforce Distribution | Yes | Yes |
| Brake Assist | No | No |
| Parking Sensors | No | No |
| Stability Control | No | Yes |
| Traction Control | No | Yes |
| Vehicle Dynamic Control | No | No |
| Forward Collision Mitigation | No | No |
| Blind Spot Warning | No | No |
| Hill Start Assist | No | Yes |
| Hill Descent Control | No | Yes |
| Auto Stop/Start | No | No |
| Driver Airbag | Yes | Yes |
| Knee Airbag | No | Yes |
| Passenger Airbag | Yes | Yes |
| Front Curtain Airbags | No | No |
| Rear Curtain Airbags | No | No |
| Rear Side Airbags | Yes | No |
| Engine Immobilizer | Yes | No |
| Security Alarm | Yes | Yes |
| Door Locking | Central Locking | Central Locking |
| Comfort & Convenience | ||
| Air Conditioning | Manual Aircon | Single Zone Automatic |
| Rear A/C Vents | Yes | No |
| Seat Material | Fabric | Fabric |
| Parking Brake | Manual | Manual |
| Key Type | Keyless Entry | Keyless Entry |
| Push-Button Start | No | No |
| Cruise Control | Yes | Yes |
| Multi-Info Display | Yes | No |
| Paddle Shifters | No | No |
| Reverse Camera | Yes | No |
| Auto Headlights | No | No |
| Power Windows | Yes | Yes |
| Power Seats | No | Yes |
| Remote Trunk Release | No | No |
| Eco Mode | Yes | No |
| Antenna | no | yes |
| Infotainment & Audio | ||
| Speakers | 4 | 6 |
| Touchscreen | No | No |
| Navigation | No | No |
| Bluetooth | No | No |
| Apple CarPlay | No | No |
| Android Auto | No | No |
| USB | Yes | Yes |
| AUX Input | Yes | Yes |
| AM/FM Radio | Yes | Yes |
| CD Player | Yes | Yes |
| DVD Player | No | No |
| MP3 Playback | Yes | Yes |
| iPod Support | No | Yes |
| SD Card Slot | No | No |
| Lighting | ||
| Headlights | Reflector Halogen | Halogen |
| Fog Lights | Yes | Yes |
| Daytime Running Lights | Yes | No |
Honda CR-V 2.0 V MT (2015) vs Ford Ranger XLT 2.2L 4×2 MT (2017): which should you buy?
The 2015 Honda CR-V 2.0 V MT is the better choice for most Filipino buyers prioritizing practicality and comfort, while the 2017 Ford Ranger XLT 2.2L 4×2 MT offers superior power and torque for those needing heavy-duty capability. The CR-V costs ₱1,333,000 versus ₱1,219,000, making it ₱114,000 cheaper and equipped with a naturally aspirated engine suited for daily use. The Ranger, however, demands more from its 2198cc turbocharged diesel, delivering 160 PS and 385 Nm of torque—ideal for demanding tasks—but lacks the CR-V’s 153 PS and 190 Nm, plus its rear-wheel-drive design reduces traction in Philippine roads. Both vehicles have 100,000km/3-year warranties, but the CR-V’s 6-speed manual transmission and FWD platform align better with most urban and suburban driving. Availability is discontinued for both, so immediate purchase is limited.
Frequently asked questions
Which is cheaper?
The Ford Ranger XLT 2.2L 4×2 MT costs ₱1,219,000, which is ₱114,000 less than the Honda CR-V 2.0 V MT's ₱1,333,000.
Which is more powerful?
The Ford Ranger XLT 2.2L 4×2 MT delivers 160 PS and 385 Nm of torque, exceeding the CR-V's 153 PS and 190 Nm.
Which is better for daily commuting?
The Honda CR-V 2.0 V MT is more practical for daily commuting thanks to its 153 PS, 190 Nm, and FWD platform, though fuel economy data is unavailable.
What drivetrain does each vehicle use?
The Honda CR-V 2.0 V MT uses FWD, while the Ford Ranger XLT 2.2L 4×2 MT uses RWD.