Honda CR-V 2.4 SX AWD (2015) vs Nissan NV350 Urvan Standard M/T (2018)

A full spec-by-spec comparison of Honda CR-V 2.4 SX AWD (2015) vs Nissan NV350 Urvan Standard M/T (2018) — engine, performance, dimensions, features and price, with the differences highlighted to help you decide.

Specification Honda CR-V 2.4 SX AWD (2015) Honda ₱1,693,000 Nissan NV350 Urvan Standard M/T (2018) Nissan NV350 Urvan Standard M/T (2018) Nissan ₱1,570,000
Overview
Model Year 2015 2018
Warranty 100,000kms/3-years 3-years/ 100,000km
Availability Discontinued Current
Engine & Drivetrain
Engine Type Inline-4 Inline-4
Displacement 2354cc 2488cc
Valvetrain SOHC 16-valve DOHC 16-valve
Aspiration Naturally Aspirated, i-VTEC Turbocharged
Fuel Type Gas Diesel
Max Power 185 PS @ 7000 rpm 129 PS @ 3200 rpm
Max Torque 220 Nm @ 4400 rpm 356 Nm @ 1400 - 2000 rpm
Transmission 5-Speed A/T 5-Speed M/T
Drivetrain 4WD RWD
Compression Ratio 15:1
Performance & Economy
0–60 mph no
0–100 km/h no
Top Speed no
Fuel Economy (City) no
Fuel Economy (Highway) no
Fuel Economy (Combined) no
Emission Standard Euro4
Body & Dimensions
Body Type SUV Van
Segment J Van
Construction Unibody Body on Frame
Doors 5 3
Seating Capacity 2+3 15
Length (mm) 4582 4695
Width (mm) 1820 1695
Height (mm) 1685 1990
Wheelbase (mm) 2620 2555
Curb Weight (kg) 1570 2076
Fuel Tank (L) 58 65
Exterior Colors Gun Metallic, Brilliant Silver, Pearl White, Alpine White, Topaz Brown, Graphite Black
Chassis, Wheels & Brakes
Front Suspension MacPherson w/ Stabilizer Torsion Beam
Rear Suspension Double Wishbone w/ Stabilizer Rigid Axle, Leaf Spring
Front Wheels 17x7 15 steel
Rear Wheels 17x7 15 steel
Front Tires 225/65 R17 195/70/R15
Rear Tires 225/65 R17 195/70/R15
Front Brakes Disc Disc
Rear Brakes Disc Drum
Steering Type EPS Hydraulic
Steering Column tilt + tele Tilt
Tire Pressure Monitoring No No
Differential Lock No No
Safety
Anti-lock Braking (ABS) Yes Yes
Electronic Brakeforce Distribution Yes Yes
Brake Assist No No
Parking Sensors No No
Stability Control Yes No
Traction Control Yes No
Vehicle Dynamic Control No No
Forward Collision Mitigation No No
Blind Spot Warning No No
Hill Start Assist Yes No
Hill Descent Control No No
Auto Stop/Start No No
Driver Airbag Yes No
Knee Airbag No No
Passenger Airbag Yes No
Front Curtain Airbags No No
Rear Curtain Airbags No No
Rear Side Airbags Yes No
Engine Immobilizer Yes No
Security Alarm Yes No
Door Locking Central Locking Central Locking
Comfort & Convenience
Air Conditioning Dual Zone Climate Control Manual Aircon w/ rear independent controls
Rear A/C Vents Yes No
Seat Material Leather Fabric
Parking Brake Foot Brake Manual
Key Type Smart Entry Keyless Entry
Push-Button Start Yes No
Cruise Control Yes No
Multi-Info Display Yes Yes
Paddle Shifters Yes No
Reverse Camera Yes No
Auto Headlights Yes No
Power Windows Yes Yes
Power Seats No No
Remote Trunk Release No No
Eco Mode Yes No
Antenna no yes
Infotainment & Audio
Speakers 6 4
Touchscreen Yes No
Navigation Yes No
Bluetooth Yes No
Apple CarPlay No No
Android Auto No No
USB Yes No
AUX Input Yes No
AM/FM Radio Yes No
CD Player Yes No
DVD Player No No
MP3 Playback Yes No
iPod Support No No
SD Card Slot No No
Lighting
Headlights HID Projector Halogen
Fog Lights Yes Yes
Daytime Running Lights Yes No
Keep comparing Add another model to this matchup — line up to four side by side.

Honda CR-V 2.4 SX AWD (2015) vs Nissan NV350 Urvan Standard M/T (2018): which should you buy?

For a Filipino buyer, the choice between the Honda CR-V 2.4 SX AWD (2015) and the Nissan NV350 Urvan Standard M/T (2018) depends entirely on your primary need: passenger comfort and performance versus people and cargo hauling. The CR-V is a discontinued compact crossover SUV with a powerful 185 PS gasoline engine and 4WD, making it ideal for families who want a refined daily driver with good road presence and all-weather capability. It has a 5-speed automatic transmission, which is easier in traffic. However, it costs ₱1,693,000 and is no longer available new, so you'd be looking at the used market. In contrast, the NV350 Urvan is a current-model van with a diesel engine producing 129 PS and a massive 356 Nm of torque, perfect for transporting multiple passengers or heavy cargo. It has a manual transmission and rear-wheel drive, and its body-on-frame construction is built for durability. At ₱1,570,000, it's cheaper and more practical for businesses, shuttle services, or large families needing maximum space. The CR-V is better for daily commuting and driving enjoyment, while the Urvan is the workhorse for utility and capacity. If you need a versatile family SUV, go for the CR-V. If you need a no-nonsense people/cargo mover, choose the NV350 Urvan.

Frequently asked questions

Which is cheaper, the Honda CR-V or the Nissan NV350 Urvan?

The Nissan NV350 Urvan is cheaper at ₱1,570,000 compared to the Honda CR-V at ₱1,693,000.

Which vehicle has more power?

The Honda CR-V has more power with 185 PS, while the Nissan NV350 Urvan has 129 PS. However, the Urvan has higher torque (356 Nm) for hauling.

Which is better for daily commuting?

The Honda CR-V is better for daily commuting due to its automatic transmission, car-like handling, and 4WD for wet roads. The NV350 Urvan's manual transmission and van body are less suited for city traffic.

Which vehicle is more practical for carrying many passengers or cargo?

The Nissan NV350 Urvan is more practical for carrying many passengers or cargo, as it is a van with a body-on-frame construction and high torque diesel engine.