Honda Mobilio 1.5 RS Navi CVT (2015) vs Toyota Tamaraw 2.0 Utility Van Gas M/T SWB (2025)
A full spec-by-spec comparison of Honda Mobilio 1.5 RS Navi CVT (2015) vs Toyota Tamaraw 2.0 Utility Van Gas M/T SWB (2025) — engine, performance, dimensions, features and price, with the differences highlighted to help you decide.
| Specification | Honda Mobilio 1.5 RS Navi CVT (2015) Honda ₱982,000 | Toyota Tamaraw 2.0 Utility Van Gas M/T SWB (2025) Toyota ₱1,025,000 |
|---|---|---|
| Overview | ||
| Model Year | 2015 | 2025 |
| Warranty | 100,000kms/3-years | 3 years or 100,000 kms |
| Availability | Discontinued | Current |
| Engine & Drivetrain | ||
| Engine Type | Inline-4 | Inline-4 |
| Displacement | 1497cc | 1998cc |
| Valvetrain | SOHC 16-valve | DOHC 16-valve |
| Aspiration | Naturally Aspirated, i-VTEC | Naturally Aspirated |
| Fuel Type | Gas | Gasoline |
| Max Power | 120 PS @ 6600 rpm | 139 PS |
| Max Torque | 145 Nm @ 4600 rpm | 183 Nm |
| Transmission | CVT | Manual 5-Speed |
| Drivetrain | FWD | RWD |
| Body & Dimensions | ||
| Body Type | MPV | Van |
| Segment | M | Van |
| Construction | Unibody | Body-on-frame |
| Doors | 5 | 3 |
| Seating Capacity | 2+3+2 | 2+10 |
| Length (mm) | 4398 | 4968 |
| Width (mm) | 1683 | 1795 |
| Height (mm) | 1603 | 2097 |
| Wheelbase (mm) | 2652 | 2750 |
| Curb Weight (kg) | 1170 | 1905 |
| Exterior Colors | — | Super white II, Silver metallic 1, Black |
| Fuel Tank (L) | — | 55 |
| Chassis, Wheels & Brakes | ||
| Front Suspension | MacPherson, Coil Spring w/ Stabilizer | IFS Coil |
| Rear Suspension | Torsion Beam w/ Coil Spring | Rigid Leaf Spring |
| Front Wheels | 15x5.5 | 14 |
| Rear Wheels | 15x5.5 | 14 |
| Front Tires | 185/65 R15 | 195R14C |
| Rear Tires | 185/65 R15 | 195R14C |
| Front Brakes | Disc | Disc |
| Rear Brakes | Drum | Drum |
| Steering Type | hydraulic | Hydraulic |
| Steering Column | tilt | Tilt |
| Tire Pressure Monitoring | No | No |
| Differential Lock | No | No |
| Safety | ||
| Anti-lock Braking (ABS) | Yes | No |
| Electronic Brakeforce Distribution | Yes | No |
| Brake Assist | No | No |
| Parking Sensors | No | No |
| Stability Control | No | No |
| Traction Control | No | No |
| Vehicle Dynamic Control | No | No |
| Forward Collision Mitigation | No | No |
| Blind Spot Warning | No | No |
| Hill Start Assist | No | No |
| Hill Descent Control | No | No |
| Auto Stop/Start | No | No |
| Driver Airbag | Yes | No |
| Knee Airbag | No | No |
| Passenger Airbag | Yes | No |
| Front Curtain Airbags | No | No |
| Rear Curtain Airbags | No | No |
| Rear Side Airbags | No | No |
| Engine Immobilizer | Yes | No |
| Security Alarm | Yes | No |
| Door Locking | Central Locking | — |
| Comfort & Convenience | ||
| Air Conditioning | Dual Manual Aircon | Manual Airconditioning |
| Rear A/C Vents | No | No |
| Seat Material | Fabric | PVC |
| Parking Brake | Manual | Manual |
| Key Type | Keyless Entry | — |
| Push-Button Start | No | No |
| Cruise Control | No | No |
| Multi-Info Display | Yes | No |
| Paddle Shifters | No | No |
| Reverse Camera | No | No |
| Auto Headlights | No | No |
| Power Windows | Yes | No |
| Power Seats | No | No |
| Remote Trunk Release | No | No |
| Eco Mode | No | No |
| Antenna | yes | no |
| Infotainment & Audio | ||
| Speakers | 4 | 2 |
| Touchscreen | Yes | Yes |
| Navigation | Yes | No |
| Bluetooth | Yes | Yes |
| Apple CarPlay | No | No |
| Android Auto | No | No |
| USB | Yes | No |
| AUX Input | Yes | No |
| AM/FM Radio | Yes | Yes |
| CD Player | Yes | No |
| DVD Player | Yes | No |
| MP3 Playback | Yes | No |
| iPod Support | No | No |
| SD Card Slot | No | No |
| Lighting | ||
| Headlights | Halogen + Foglamps | Halogen |
| Fog Lights | Yes | No |
| Daytime Running Lights | No | No |
Honda Mobilio 1.5 RS Navi CVT (2015) vs Toyota Tamaraw 2.0 Utility Van Gas M/T SWB (2025): which should you buy?
For a Filipino buyer, the choice between the Honda Mobilio 1.5 RS Navi CVT (2015) and the Toyota Tamaraw 2.0 Utility Van Gas M/T SWB (2025) hinges on intended use. The Mobilio, at ₱982,000, is a discontinued MPV with a car-like unibody, CVT, and FWD, making it ideal for daily commuting and family use with seating for 7 (2+3+2). It has 120 PS and 145 Nm, and a 3-year/100,000 km warranty. In contrast, the Tamaraw is a current model priced at ₱1,025,000, a body-on-frame van with RWD, manual transmission, and seating for 12 (2+10), suited for heavy-duty cargo or passenger transport. It offers more power (139 PS, 183 Nm) and a larger 2.0L engine. The Mobilio is cheaper, more fuel-efficient, and easier to drive in traffic, while the Tamaraw is more practical for commercial use or rough roads. Choose the Mobilio for a comfortable daily driver; choose the Tamaraw for utility and durability.
Frequently asked questions
Which is cheaper, the Honda Mobilio or the Toyota Tamaraw?
The Honda Mobilio 1.5 RS Navi CVT (2015) is cheaper at ₱982,000, while the Toyota Tamaraw 2.0 Utility Van Gas M/T SWB (2025) is ₱1,025,000.
Which vehicle has more power and torque?
The Toyota Tamaraw has more power (139 PS vs 120 PS) and more torque (183 Nm vs 145 Nm) due to its larger 2.0L engine.
Which is better for daily commuting in the city?
The Honda Mobilio is better for daily commuting due to its CVT, FWD, and car-like unibody construction, offering easier driving and better fuel efficiency.
Which vehicle can carry more passengers?
The Toyota Tamaraw seats up to 12 (2+10), while the Honda Mobilio seats 7 (2+3+2), making the Tamaraw more suitable for larger groups or commercial use.