Isuzu Crosswind XUV MT Dsl (2015) vs Nissan NV350 Urvan Cargo (2015)
A full spec-by-spec comparison of Isuzu Crosswind XUV MT Dsl (2015) vs Nissan NV350 Urvan Cargo (2015) — engine, performance, dimensions, features and price, with the differences highlighted to help you decide.
| Specification | Isuzu Crosswind XUV MT Dsl (2015) Isuzu ₱1,130,000 | Nissan NV350 Urvan Cargo (2015) Nissan ₱1,158,000 |
|---|---|---|
| Overview | ||
| Model Year | 2015 | 2015 |
| Warranty | 100,000km/3-years | 100,000km/3-years |
| Availability | Discontinued | Discontinued |
| Engine & Drivetrain | ||
| Engine Type | Inline-4 | Inline-4 |
| Displacement | 2499cc | 2488cc |
| Valvetrain | SOHC 24valve | DOHC 16-valve |
| Aspiration | Turbocharged | Variable Turbocharger (VGS) |
| Fuel Type | Diesel | Diesel |
| Max Power | 85 PS @ 3900 rpm | 129 PS @ 3200 rpm |
| Max Torque | 185 Nm @ 2000 rpm | 356 Nm @ 1400-2000 rpm |
| Transmission | 5-Speed M/T | 5-Speed M/T (Dash-Mounted) |
| Drivetrain | RWD | — |
| Body & Dimensions | ||
| Body Type | AUV | Van |
| Segment | M | M |
| Construction | Body-on-frame | — |
| Doors | 5 | 4 |
| Seating Capacity | 9 | 3 |
| Length (mm) | 4730 | 5080 |
| Width (mm) | 1770 | 1695 |
| Height (mm) | 1900 | 2285 |
| Wheelbase (mm) | 2680 | 2940 |
| Curb Weight (kg) | — | 1825 |
| Fuel Tank (L) | — | 65 |
| Chassis, Wheels & Brakes | ||
| Front Suspension | Double Wishbone | Torsion Bar with Front Stabilizer |
| Rear Suspension | Rigid Axle, Leaf Springs | Leaf Spring |
| Front Wheels | 15x6.5" Alloys | 15 |
| Rear Wheels | 15x6.5" Alloys | 15 |
| Front Tires | 235/70/R15 | 195/80R15LT |
| Rear Tires | 235/70/R15 | 195/80R15LT |
| Front Brakes | Disc | — |
| Rear Brakes | Drum | Drum |
| Steering Type | hydraulic | Power Steering |
| Steering Column | tilt | Manual Tilt |
| Tire Pressure Monitoring | No | No |
| Differential Lock | No | No |
| Safety | ||
| Anti-lock Braking (ABS) | No | No |
| Electronic Brakeforce Distribution | No | No |
| Brake Assist | No | No |
| Parking Sensors | No | No |
| Stability Control | No | No |
| Traction Control | No | No |
| Vehicle Dynamic Control | No | No |
| Forward Collision Mitigation | No | No |
| Blind Spot Warning | No | No |
| Hill Start Assist | No | No |
| Hill Descent Control | No | No |
| Auto Stop/Start | No | No |
| Driver Airbag | No | Yes |
| Knee Airbag | No | No |
| Passenger Airbag | No | No |
| Front Curtain Airbags | No | No |
| Rear Curtain Airbags | No | No |
| Rear Side Airbags | No | No |
| Security Alarm | Yes | No |
| Door Locking | Central Locking | Standard |
| Engine Immobilizer | — | No |
| Comfort & Convenience | ||
| Air Conditioning | Manual Aircon | Manual, Dial Type |
| Rear A/C Vents | No | Yes |
| Seat Material | Vinyl | Fabric |
| Parking Brake | Manual | Manual |
| Key Type | Keyless Entry | Manual |
| Push-Button Start | No | No |
| Cruise Control | No | No |
| Multi-Info Display | No | No |
| Paddle Shifters | No | No |
| Reverse Camera | No | No |
| Auto Headlights | No | No |
| Power Windows | Yes | Yes |
| Power Seats | No | No |
| Remote Trunk Release | No | No |
| Eco Mode | No | No |
| Antenna | yes | yes |
| Infotainment & Audio | ||
| Touchscreen | No | No |
| Navigation | No | No |
| Bluetooth | No | No |
| Apple CarPlay | No | No |
| Android Auto | No | No |
| USB | No | No |
| AUX Input | No | No |
| AM/FM Radio | Yes | No |
| CD Player | Yes | No |
| DVD Player | No | No |
| MP3 Playback | Yes | No |
| iPod Support | Yes | No |
| SD Card Slot | No | No |
| Speakers | — | 2 |
| Lighting | ||
| Headlights | Halogen + Foglamps | Halogen |
| Fog Lights | Yes | Yes |
| Daytime Running Lights | — | No |
Isuzu Crosswind XUV MT Dsl (2015) vs Nissan NV350 Urvan Cargo (2015): which should you buy?
The Isuzu Crosswind XUV MT Dsl (₱1,130,000) offers better value for Filipino buyers prioritizing rugged capability and interior space, while the Nissan NV350 Urvan Cargo (₱1,158,000) is suited for heavy-duty cargo tasks. The Crosswind’s 5-speed manual transmission and 9-seat layout make it more practical for families or small businesses needing versatility, whereas the NV350’s 5-speed dash-mounted transmission and 3-seat configuration emphasize load capacity. Both models have identical 100,000km/3-year warranties and are discontinued, so the decision hinges on budget, intended use, and cargo needs. The NV350’s higher power (129 PS vs 85 PS) and torque (356 Nm vs 185 Nm) make it superior for transporting goods, while the Crosswind’s 9 seats and RWD design suit off-road use and passenger comfort. For most Filipino owners, the Crosswind is the better daily driver, though the NV350 is ideal for logistics.
Frequently asked questions
Which is cheaper?
The Isuzu Crosswind XUV MT Dsl costs ₱1,130,000, while the Nissan NV350 Urvan Cargo costs ₱1,158,000.
Which is more powerful?
The Nissan NV350 Urvan Cargo produces 129 PS, compared to 85 PS for the Isuzu Crosswind XUV MT Dsl.
Which is better for daily commuting?
The Isuzu Crosswind XUV MT Dsl is better for daily commuting due to its 9 seats and RWD drivetrain.
Which is better for cargo?
The Nissan NV350 Urvan Cargo is better for cargo due to its 356 Nm torque and van design.