Isuzu mu-X 2.5 LS 4×2 MT Dsl (2015) vs Nissan NV350 Urvan Cargo (2015)
A full spec-by-spec comparison of Isuzu mu-X 2.5 LS 4×2 MT Dsl (2015) vs Nissan NV350 Urvan Cargo (2015) — engine, performance, dimensions, features and price, with the differences highlighted to help you decide.
| Specification | Isuzu mu-X 2.5 LS 4×2 MT Dsl (2015) Isuzu ₱1,208,000 | Nissan NV350 Urvan Cargo (2015) Nissan ₱1,158,000 |
|---|---|---|
| Overview | ||
| Model Year | 2015 | 2015 |
| Warranty | 100,000km/3-years | 100,000km/3-years |
| Availability | Discontinued | Discontinued |
| Engine & Drivetrain | ||
| Engine Type | Inline-4 | Inline-4 |
| Displacement | 2499cc | 2488cc |
| Valvetrain | DOHC 16-valve | DOHC 16-valve |
| Aspiration | Variable Geometry Turbo | Variable Turbocharger (VGS) |
| Fuel Type | Diesel | Diesel |
| Max Power | 136 PS @ 3400 rpm | 129 PS @ 3200 rpm |
| Max Torque | 320 Nm @ 1800 - 2800 rpm | 356 Nm @ 1400-2000 rpm |
| Transmission | 5-Speed M/T | 5-Speed M/T (Dash-Mounted) |
| Drivetrain | RWD | — |
| Body & Dimensions | ||
| Body Type | SUV | Van |
| Segment | J | M |
| Doors | 5 | 4 |
| Seating Capacity | 2+3+2 | 3 |
| Length (mm) | 4825 | 5080 |
| Width (mm) | 1860 | 1695 |
| Height (mm) | 1825 | 2285 |
| Wheelbase (mm) | 2845 | 2940 |
| Curb Weight (kg) | — | 1825 |
| Fuel Tank (L) | — | 65 |
| Chassis, Wheels & Brakes | ||
| Front Suspension | Double Wishbone w/ Coil Springs, Stabilizer | Torsion Bar with Front Stabilizer |
| Rear Suspension | Five-Link Coil Spring, Stabilizer | Leaf Spring |
| Front Wheels | 16 | 15 |
| Rear Wheels | 16 | 15 |
| Front Tires | 245/70/R16 | 195/80R15LT |
| Rear Tires | 245/70/R16 | 195/80R15LT |
| Front Brakes | Disc | — |
| Rear Brakes | Drum | Drum |
| Steering Type | hydraulic | Power Steering |
| Steering Column | tilt | Manual Tilt |
| Tire Pressure Monitoring | No | No |
| Differential Lock | No | No |
| Safety | ||
| Anti-lock Braking (ABS) | No | No |
| Electronic Brakeforce Distribution | No | No |
| Brake Assist | No | No |
| Parking Sensors | No | No |
| Stability Control | No | No |
| Traction Control | No | No |
| Vehicle Dynamic Control | No | No |
| Forward Collision Mitigation | No | No |
| Blind Spot Warning | No | No |
| Hill Start Assist | No | No |
| Hill Descent Control | No | No |
| Auto Stop/Start | No | No |
| Driver Airbag | No | Yes |
| Knee Airbag | No | No |
| Passenger Airbag | No | No |
| Front Curtain Airbags | No | No |
| Rear Curtain Airbags | No | No |
| Rear Side Airbags | No | No |
| Engine Immobilizer | No | No |
| Security Alarm | Yes | No |
| Door Locking | Central Locking | Standard |
| Comfort & Convenience | ||
| Air Conditioning | Dual Manual Aircon | Manual, Dial Type |
| Rear A/C Vents | Yes | Yes |
| Seat Material | Fabric | Fabric |
| Parking Brake | Manual | Manual |
| Key Type | Keyless Entry | Manual |
| Push-Button Start | No | No |
| Cruise Control | No | No |
| Multi-Info Display | No | No |
| Paddle Shifters | No | No |
| Reverse Camera | No | No |
| Auto Headlights | No | No |
| Power Windows | Yes | Yes |
| Power Seats | No | No |
| Remote Trunk Release | No | No |
| Eco Mode | No | No |
| Antenna | yes | yes |
| Infotainment & Audio | ||
| Touchscreen | No | No |
| Navigation | No | No |
| Bluetooth | Yes | No |
| Apple CarPlay | No | No |
| Android Auto | No | No |
| USB | Yes | No |
| AUX Input | Yes | No |
| AM/FM Radio | Yes | No |
| CD Player | Yes | No |
| DVD Player | Yes | No |
| MP3 Playback | Yes | No |
| iPod Support | No | No |
| SD Card Slot | No | No |
| Speakers | — | 2 |
| Lighting | ||
| Headlights | HID | Halogen |
| Fog Lights | No | Yes |
| Daytime Running Lights | No | No |
Isuzu mu-X 2.5 LS 4×2 MT Dsl (2015) vs Nissan NV350 Urvan Cargo (2015): which should you buy?
For a Filipino buyer choosing between the 2015 Isuzu mu-X 2.5 LS 4×2 MT Dsl and the 2015 Nissan NV350 Urvan Cargo, the decision hinges on intended use. The mu-X is a 7-seater SUV (₱1,208,000) with 136 PS and 320 Nm, suited for family or personal transport with off-road capability (RWD, SUV body). The NV350 is a cargo van (₱1,158,000) with 129 PS and higher torque (356 Nm) at lower rpm, ideal for commercial hauling with a 3-seat cabin and large cargo area. The mu-X offers more passenger capacity and a car-like driving position, while the NV350 provides better torque for heavy loads and a lower price. Neither is ideal for daily commuting: the mu-X is large and fuel-thirsty, the NV350 is utilitarian. If you need a family SUV, pick the mu-X; if you need a work van, pick the NV350. Both are discontinued, so consider used market availability.
Frequently asked questions
Which is cheaper?
The Nissan NV350 Urvan Cargo is cheaper at ₱1,158,000, while the Isuzu mu-X costs ₱1,208,000.
Which has more power?
The Isuzu mu-X has higher max power at 136 PS, while the Nissan NV350 has 129 PS. However, the NV350 produces more torque (356 Nm vs 320 Nm) at lower rpm, making it better for hauling.
Which is better for carrying passengers?
The Isuzu mu-X seats up to 7 (2+3+2 layout), making it better for passenger transport. The Nissan NV350 seats only 3 and is designed for cargo.
Which is better for daily commuting?
Neither is ideal. The mu-X is a large SUV with higher fuel consumption, and the NV350 is a cargo van with basic comfort. For daily commuting, a smaller car or crossover would be more practical.