Kia Grand Carnival 2.2 EX AT (2015) vs Ford Everest 3.2 Titanium Premium 4×4 AT (2017)
A full spec-by-spec comparison of Kia Grand Carnival 2.2 EX AT (2015) vs Ford Everest 3.2 Titanium Premium 4×4 AT (2017) — engine, performance, dimensions, features and price, with the differences highlighted to help you decide.
| Specification | Kia Grand Carnival 2.2 EX AT (2015) Kia ₱2,300,000 | Ford Everest 3.2 Titanium Premium 4×4 AT (2017) Ford ₱2,288,000 |
|---|---|---|
| Overview | ||
| Model Year | 2015 | 2017 |
| Warranty | 160,000km/5-years | 100,000km/3-years |
| Availability | Discontinued | Current |
| Engine & Drivetrain | ||
| Engine Type | Inline-4 | Inline-5 |
| Displacement | 2199cc | 3198cc |
| Valvetrain | DOHC 16valve | DOHC 20-valve |
| Aspiration | Turbo Intercooled (E-GVT), DI | Turbocharged CRDI |
| Fuel Type | Diesel | Diesel |
| Max Power | 200 PS @ 3800 rpm | 200 PS @ 3000 rpm |
| Max Torque | 441 Nm @ 1750-2750 rpm | 470 Nm @ 1750 rpm |
| Transmission | 6-Speed A/T | 6-Speed A/T |
| Drivetrain | FWD | 4WD |
| Body & Dimensions | ||
| Body Type | Van | SUV |
| Segment | M | J |
| Construction | Unibody | Body-on-frame |
| Doors | 5 | 5 |
| Seating Capacity | 2+2+3 | 2+3+2 |
| Length (mm) | 5115 | 4893 |
| Width (mm) | 1985 | 1862 |
| Height (mm) | 1755 | 1836 |
| Wheelbase (mm) | 3060 | 2850 |
| Curb Weight (kg) | 1992 | — |
| Chassis, Wheels & Brakes | ||
| Front Suspension | MacPherson w/ Stabilizer | Double Wishbone |
| Rear Suspension | Multi-Link | Live Axle |
| Front Wheels | 18” Alloys | 20 |
| Rear Wheels | 18” Alloys | 20 |
| Front Tires | 235/60 R18 | 265/50 R20 |
| Rear Tires | 235/60 R18 | 265/50 R20 |
| Front Brakes | Disc | Disc |
| Rear Brakes | Disc | Disc |
| Steering Type | Hydraulic | Hydraulic |
| Steering Column | Tilt | tilt |
| Tire Pressure Monitoring | No | No |
| Differential Lock | No | No |
| Safety | ||
| Anti-lock Braking (ABS) | Yes | Yes |
| Electronic Brakeforce Distribution | Yes | Yes |
| Brake Assist | No | No |
| Parking Sensors | Yes | Yes |
| Stability Control | No | Yes |
| Traction Control | No | Yes |
| Vehicle Dynamic Control | No | No |
| Forward Collision Mitigation | No | No |
| Blind Spot Warning | No | No |
| Hill Start Assist | No | Yes |
| Hill Descent Control | No | No |
| Auto Stop/Start | No | No |
| Driver Airbag | Yes | Yes |
| Knee Airbag | No | No |
| Passenger Airbag | Yes | Yes |
| Front Curtain Airbags | No | Yes |
| Rear Curtain Airbags | No | Yes |
| Rear Side Airbags | No | Yes |
| Engine Immobilizer | No | No |
| Security Alarm | Yes | Yes |
| Door Locking | keyless | Central Locking |
| Comfort & Convenience | ||
| Air Conditioning | Tri-zone Automatic Climate Control | Dual Zone Automatic Climate Control |
| Rear A/C Vents | No | Yes |
| Seat Material | Leather | Leather |
| Parking Brake | Foot Brake | Manual |
| Key Type | Keyless Entry | Keyless Entry |
| Push-Button Start | Yes | No |
| Cruise Control | Yes | Yes |
| Multi-Info Display | Yes | Yes |
| Paddle Shifters | No | No |
| Reverse Camera | No | Yes |
| Auto Headlights | No | Yes |
| Power Windows | Yes | Yes |
| Power Seats | Yes | Yes |
| Remote Trunk Release | No | No |
| Eco Mode | No | No |
| Antenna | yes | yes |
| Infotainment & Audio | ||
| Touchscreen | No | Yes |
| Navigation | No | No |
| Bluetooth | Yes | Yes |
| Apple CarPlay | No | No |
| Android Auto | No | No |
| USB | Yes | Yes |
| AUX Input | Yes | Yes |
| AM/FM Radio | Yes | Yes |
| CD Player | Yes | Yes |
| DVD Player | No | No |
| MP3 Playback | Yes | Yes |
| iPod Support | Yes | Yes |
| SD Card Slot | No | No |
| Speakers | — | 10 |
| Lighting | ||
| Headlights | Halogen | Halogen |
| Fog Lights | Yes | Yes |
| Daytime Running Lights | No | No |
Kia Grand Carnival 2.2 EX AT (2015) vs Ford Everest 3.2 Titanium Premium 4×4 AT (2017): which should you buy?
For Filipino buyers, the choice between the Kia Grand Carnival 2.2 EX AT (2015) and Ford Everest 3.2 Titanium Premium 4x4 AT (2017) hinges on intended use. Both are diesel, automatic, and produce 200 PS, but the Grand Carnival is a front-wheel-drive van with a unibody construction, seating 2+2+3 (8 seats), and a longer 5-year/160,000-km warranty. It is ideal for large families or commercial passenger transport, offering more interior space and a lower step-in height. However, it is discontinued, which may affect parts availability. The Everest is a body-on-frame SUV with 4WD, seating 2+3+2 (7 seats), and generates 470 Nm of torque (vs. 441 Nm in the Carnival), making it better for off-road or towing. It is currently available, but has a shorter 3-year/100,000-km warranty. At ₱2,288,000, the Everest is ₱12,000 cheaper than the Carnival at ₱2,300,000. For daily commuting and passenger comfort, the Carnival excels. For adventure and rugged terrain, the Everest is superior. Your priority between space and off-road capability will decide.
Frequently asked questions
Which is cheaper?
The Ford Everest is slightly cheaper at ₱2,288,000 compared to the Kia Grand Carnival at ₱2,300,000.
Which has more power?
Both have 200 PS, but the Ford Everest has higher torque at 470 Nm versus the Grand Carnival's 441 Nm.
Which is better for daily commuting?
The Kia Grand Carnival, with its front-wheel drive, unibody construction, and longer warranty, offers a more comfortable and efficient ride for daily use.
Which is better for off-road driving?
The Ford Everest, with its 4WD, body-on-frame chassis, and higher torque, is superior for off-road and rough terrain.