Land Rover Evoque Coupe AT (2015) vs Ford Mustang Mach-E Premium AWD (2026)
A full spec-by-spec comparison of Land Rover Evoque Coupe AT (2015) vs Ford Mustang Mach-E Premium AWD (2026) — engine, performance, dimensions, features and price, with the differences highlighted to help you decide.
| Specification | Land Rover Evoque Coupe AT (2015) Land Rover ₱5,500,000 | Ford Mustang Mach-E Premium AWD (2026) Ford ₱3,499,000 |
|---|---|---|
| Overview | ||
| Model Year | 2015 | 2026 |
| Warranty | 100,000km/3-years | 3-years/100,000 km |
| Availability | Current | Current |
| Engine & Drivetrain | ||
| Engine Type | Inline-4 | Electric Motor |
| Displacement | 1999cc | — |
| Valvetrain | DOHC 16-valve | — |
| Aspiration | Turbo Direct Injection | — |
| Fuel Type | Gas | Electric |
| Max Power | 240 PS @ 5500 rpm | 394 PS |
| Max Torque | 339 Nm @ 1750 rpm | 676 Nm |
| Transmission | 6-Speed A/T | Automatic |
| Drivetrain | 4WD | AWD |
| Body & Dimensions | ||
| Body Type | Crossover | Midsize Crossover SUV |
| Segment | J | SUV |
| Construction | Unibody | Unibody |
| Doors | 3 | 5 |
| Seating Capacity | 2+3 | 2+3 |
| Length (mm) | 4365 | 4713 |
| Width (mm) | 1965 | 1881 |
| Height (mm) | 1605 | 1627 |
| Wheelbase (mm) | 2660 | 2984 |
| Curb Weight (kg) | 1640 | 2084 |
| Exterior Colors | — | Shadow Black, Star White, Velocity Blue Metallic, Glacier Gray, Grabber Yellow |
| Chassis, Wheels & Brakes | ||
| Front Suspension | MacPherson | MacPherson Strut w/Coil Spring |
| Rear Suspension | Multi-Link | Multi-link with Coil Spring |
| Front Brakes | Disc | Disc |
| Rear Brakes | Disc | Disc |
| Steering Type | hydraulic | EPS |
| Steering Column | tilt | Tilt & Telescope |
| Tire Pressure Monitoring | No | Yes |
| Differential Lock | No | No |
| Front Wheels | — | 19 |
| Rear Wheels | — | 19 |
| Front Tires | — | 225/55R19 |
| Rear Tires | — | 225/55R19 |
| Safety | ||
| Anti-lock Braking (ABS) | Yes | Yes |
| Electronic Brakeforce Distribution | Yes | Yes |
| Brake Assist | No | Yes |
| Parking Sensors | No | Yes |
| Stability Control | Yes | Yes |
| Traction Control | No | Yes |
| Vehicle Dynamic Control | No | No |
| Forward Collision Mitigation | No | No |
| Blind Spot Warning | No | No |
| Hill Start Assist | No | Yes |
| Hill Descent Control | No | Yes |
| Auto Stop/Start | No | No |
| Driver Airbag | No | Yes |
| Knee Airbag | No | No |
| Passenger Airbag | No | Yes |
| Front Curtain Airbags | No | Yes |
| Rear Curtain Airbags | No | Yes |
| Rear Side Airbags | No | Yes |
| Security Alarm | Yes | Yes |
| Door Locking | Central Locking | Central Locking |
| Engine Immobilizer | — | Yes |
| Comfort & Convenience | ||
| Air Conditioning | Auto Climate Control System | Automatic Climate Control Dual Zone |
| Rear A/C Vents | No | Yes |
| Seat Material | Leather | Leather |
| Parking Brake | Electronic | EPB |
| Key Type | Keyless Entry | Keyless Entry |
| Push-Button Start | No | Yes |
| Cruise Control | No | Yes |
| Multi-Info Display | Yes | Yes |
| Paddle Shifters | No | No |
| Reverse Camera | No | Yes |
| Auto Headlights | No | No |
| Power Windows | Yes | Yes |
| Power Seats | Yes | Yes |
| Remote Trunk Release | No | Yes |
| Eco Mode | No | No |
| Antenna | yes | yes |
| Infotainment & Audio | ||
| Touchscreen | No | Yes |
| Navigation | No | No |
| Bluetooth | No | Yes |
| Apple CarPlay | No | Yes |
| Android Auto | No | Yes |
| USB | Yes | Yes |
| AUX Input | Yes | No |
| AM/FM Radio | Yes | Yes |
| CD Player | Yes | No |
| DVD Player | No | No |
| MP3 Playback | Yes | No |
| iPod Support | Yes | No |
| SD Card Slot | No | No |
| Speakers | — | 9 |
| Lighting | ||
| Headlights | HID + Foglamps | LED |
| Fog Lights | Yes | No |
| Daytime Running Lights | — | Yes |
Land Rover Evoque Coupe AT (2015) vs Ford Mustang Mach-E Premium AWD (2026): which should you buy?
For the Filipino buyer comparing these two, the Ford Mustang Mach-E Premium AWD (2026) offers significantly better value. It is cheaper by over ₱2 million (₱3,499,000 vs ₱5,500,000), more powerful (394 PS vs 240 PS), and more torquier (676 Nm vs 339 Nm). The Mach-E is electric, which means lower running costs and a modern driving experience. It also has more doors (5 vs 3) and a longer body (4713 mm vs 4365 mm), making it more practical for daily use and family hauling. The Land Rover Evoque, while a luxury badge, is a 2015 model with an older gas engine, lower power, and higher price. Unless you specifically want a compact, stylish crossover with off-road heritage and are willing to pay a premium for the Land Rover name, the Mach-E is the smarter choice. However, consider that the Evoque has a 4WD system (likely more robust for mild off-roading) and a proven turbo engine. For typical city driving, the Mach-E excels in efficiency, space, and performance. Bottom line: the Mustang Mach-E is the recommended pick for most Filipino buyers due to its lower cost, superior power, and modern electric powertrain.
Frequently asked questions
Which is cheaper, the Land Rover Evoque or the Ford Mustang Mach-E?
The Ford Mustang Mach-E is cheaper at ₱3,499,000, while the Land Rover Evoque costs ₱5,500,000.
Which vehicle has more power and torque?
The Ford Mustang Mach-E has more power (394 PS vs 240 PS) and significantly more torque (676 Nm vs 339 Nm).
Which is better for daily commuting in the Philippines?
The Ford Mustang Mach-E is better for daily commuting because it is electric (lower fuel cost), has more doors and interior space, and offers modern features. The Land Rover Evoque is older and less efficient.
Which vehicle is more practical for a family?
The Ford Mustang Mach-E is more practical with 5 doors and a longer body (4713 mm) compared to the Evoque's 3 doors and shorter length (4365 mm). The Mach-E also seats 5 like the Evoque but offers easier access and more cargo space.