Mazda 3 Hatchback SkyActiv-R AT (2015) vs Ford Ranger XLT 2.2L 4×2 MT (2017)
A full spec-by-spec comparison of Mazda 3 Hatchback SkyActiv-R AT (2015) vs Ford Ranger XLT 2.2L 4×2 MT (2017) — engine, performance, dimensions, features and price, with the differences highlighted to help you decide.
| Specification | Mazda 3 Hatchback SkyActiv-R AT (2015) Mazda ₱1,268,000 | Ford Ranger XLT 2.2L 4×2 MT (2017) Ford ₱1,219,000 |
|---|---|---|
| Overview | ||
| Model Year | 2015 | 2017 |
| Warranty | 100,000km/3-years | 100,000km/3-years |
| Availability | Discontinued | Discontinued |
| Engine & Drivetrain | ||
| Engine Type | Inline-4 | Inline-4 |
| Displacement | 1998cc | 2198cc |
| Valvetrain | DOHC 16-valve | DOHC 16-valve |
| Aspiration | Naturally Aspirated, S-VT | Turbocharged |
| Fuel Type | Gas | Diesel |
| Max Power | 155 PS @ 6000 rpm | 160 PS @ 3200 rpm |
| Max Torque | 200 Nm @ 4000 rpm | 385 Nm @ 1600-2500 rpm |
| Transmission | 6-Speed A/T | 6-Speed M/T |
| Drivetrain | FWD | RWD |
| Body & Dimensions | ||
| Body Type | Sedan | Pick Up |
| Segment | C | Pick-Up |
| Construction | Unibody | Body On Frame |
| Doors | 4 | 4 |
| Seating Capacity | 2+3 | 2+3 |
| Length (mm) | 4580 | 5277 |
| Width (mm) | 1795 | 2163 |
| Height (mm) | 1450 | 1821 |
| Wheelbase (mm) | 2700 | 3220 |
| Curb Weight (kg) | 1304 | — |
| Fuel Tank (L) | — | 80 |
| Chassis, Wheels & Brakes | ||
| Front Suspension | MacPherson | Double Wishbone with Coil Spring |
| Rear Suspension | Multi-Link | Leaf Spring |
| Front Wheels | 18x7.0" Alloys | 17" Alloys |
| Rear Wheels | 18x7.0" Alloys | 17" Alloys |
| Front Tires | 215/45/R18 | 265/65 R17 |
| Rear Tires | 215/45/R18 | 265/65 R17 |
| Front Brakes | Disc | Disc |
| Rear Brakes | Disc | Drum |
| Steering Type | hydraulic | EPS |
| Steering Column | tilt | — |
| Tire Pressure Monitoring | No | No |
| Differential Lock | No | No |
| Safety | ||
| Anti-lock Braking (ABS) | Yes | Yes |
| Electronic Brakeforce Distribution | Yes | Yes |
| Brake Assist | Yes | No |
| Parking Sensors | No | No |
| Stability Control | No | Yes |
| Traction Control | No | Yes |
| Vehicle Dynamic Control | No | No |
| Forward Collision Mitigation | No | No |
| Blind Spot Warning | No | No |
| Hill Start Assist | No | Yes |
| Hill Descent Control | No | Yes |
| Auto Stop/Start | No | No |
| Driver Airbag | No | Yes |
| Knee Airbag | No | Yes |
| Passenger Airbag | No | Yes |
| Front Curtain Airbags | No | No |
| Rear Curtain Airbags | No | No |
| Rear Side Airbags | No | No |
| Security Alarm | Yes | Yes |
| Door Locking | Central Locking | Central Locking |
| Engine Immobilizer | — | No |
| Comfort & Convenience | ||
| Air Conditioning | Automatic Climate Control | Single Zone Automatic |
| Rear A/C Vents | No | No |
| Seat Material | Leather | Fabric |
| Parking Brake | Manual | Manual |
| Key Type | Keyless Entry | Keyless Entry |
| Push-Button Start | No | No |
| Cruise Control | No | Yes |
| Multi-Info Display | Yes | No |
| Paddle Shifters | No | No |
| Reverse Camera | No | No |
| Auto Headlights | No | No |
| Power Windows | Yes | Yes |
| Power Seats | No | Yes |
| Remote Trunk Release | No | No |
| Eco Mode | No | No |
| Antenna | yes | yes |
| Infotainment & Audio | ||
| Touchscreen | Yes | No |
| Navigation | No | No |
| Bluetooth | Yes | No |
| Apple CarPlay | No | No |
| Android Auto | No | No |
| USB | Yes | Yes |
| AUX Input | Yes | Yes |
| AM/FM Radio | Yes | Yes |
| CD Player | Yes | Yes |
| DVD Player | No | No |
| MP3 Playback | Yes | Yes |
| iPod Support | No | Yes |
| SD Card Slot | No | No |
| Speakers | — | 6 |
| Lighting | ||
| Headlights | HID + Foglamps | Halogen |
| Fog Lights | Yes | Yes |
| Daytime Running Lights | — | No |
Mazda 3 Hatchback SkyActiv-R AT (2015) vs Ford Ranger XLT 2.2L 4×2 MT (2017): which should you buy?
For a Filipino buyer deciding between the 2015 Mazda 3 Hatchback SkyActiv‑R AT and the 2017 Ford Ranger XLT 2.2L 4×2 MT, the choice hinges on intended use and budget. The Mazda 3,{price: pes ₁,268,000, making it slightly pricier than the Ranger’s ₱1,219,000. The Mazda delivers 155 PS and 200 Nm, sufficient for city driving, while the Ranger offers 160
Frequently asked questions
Which model is cheaper?
The Ford Ranger XLT 2.2L 4×2 MT is priced at ₱1,219,000, which is ₱49,000 less than the Mazda 3’s ₱1,268,000.
Which vehicle has more power?
The Ranger produces 160 PS, slightly higher than the Mazda 3’s 155 PS, and also delivers significantly more torque (385 Nm vs 200 Nm).
Is the Mazda 3 suitable for cargo or off‑road use?
No; the Mazda 3 is a sedan with a unibody construction, front‑wheel drive and limited cargo space, making it less suited for heavy loads or off‑road conditions compared to the body‑on‑frame, rear‑wheel‑drive Ranger pickup.
Which car is better for daily commuting in the city?
The Mazda 3, with its smaller length (4580 mm), front‑wheel drive and lower price, offers easier maneuverability and adequate power for city driving, while the Ranger’s larger size and higher torque are geared toward utility rather than urban commuting.