Mazda 3 Sedan SkyActiv-R AT (2015) vs Ford Ranger XLT 2.2L 4×2 MT (2017)
A full spec-by-spec comparison of Mazda 3 Sedan SkyActiv-R AT (2015) vs Ford Ranger XLT 2.2L 4×2 MT (2017) — engine, performance, dimensions, features and price, with the differences highlighted to help you decide.
| Specification | Mazda 3 Sedan SkyActiv-R AT (2015) Mazda ₱1,248,000 | Ford Ranger XLT 2.2L 4×2 MT (2017) Ford ₱1,219,000 |
|---|---|---|
| Overview | ||
| Model Year | 2015 | 2017 |
| Warranty | 100,000km/3-years | 100,000km/3-years |
| Availability | Discontinued | Discontinued |
| Engine & Drivetrain | ||
| Engine Type | Inline-4 | Inline-4 |
| Displacement | 1998cc | 2198cc |
| Valvetrain | DOHC 16-valve | DOHC 16-valve |
| Aspiration | Naturally Aspirated, S-VT | Turbocharged |
| Fuel Type | Gas | Diesel |
| Max Power | 155 PS @ 6000 rpm | 160 PS @ 3200 rpm |
| Max Torque | 200 Nm @ 4000 rpm | 385 Nm @ 1600-2500 rpm |
| Transmission | 6-Speed A/T | 6-Speed M/T |
| Drivetrain | FWD | RWD |
| Body & Dimensions | ||
| Body Type | Sedan | Pick Up |
| Segment | C | Pick-Up |
| Construction | Unibody | Body On Frame |
| Doors | 4 | 4 |
| Seating Capacity | 2+3 | 2+3 |
| Length (mm) | 4580 | 5277 |
| Width (mm) | 1795 | 2163 |
| Height (mm) | 1450 | 1821 |
| Wheelbase (mm) | 2700 | 3220 |
| Curb Weight (kg) | 1304 | — |
| Fuel Tank (L) | — | 80 |
| Chassis, Wheels & Brakes | ||
| Front Suspension | MacPherson | Double Wishbone with Coil Spring |
| Rear Suspension | Multi-Link | Leaf Spring |
| Front Wheels | 18x7.0" Alloys | 17" Alloys |
| Rear Wheels | 18x7.0" Alloys | 17" Alloys |
| Front Tires | 215/45/R18 | 265/65 R17 |
| Rear Tires | 215/45/R18 | 265/65 R17 |
| Front Brakes | Disc | Disc |
| Rear Brakes | Disc | Drum |
| Steering Type | hydraulic | EPS |
| Steering Column | tilt | — |
| Tire Pressure Monitoring | No | No |
| Differential Lock | No | No |
| Safety | ||
| Anti-lock Braking (ABS) | Yes | Yes |
| Electronic Brakeforce Distribution | Yes | Yes |
| Brake Assist | Yes | No |
| Parking Sensors | No | No |
| Stability Control | No | Yes |
| Traction Control | No | Yes |
| Vehicle Dynamic Control | No | No |
| Forward Collision Mitigation | No | No |
| Blind Spot Warning | No | No |
| Hill Start Assist | No | Yes |
| Hill Descent Control | No | Yes |
| Auto Stop/Start | No | No |
| Driver Airbag | No | Yes |
| Knee Airbag | No | Yes |
| Passenger Airbag | No | Yes |
| Front Curtain Airbags | No | No |
| Rear Curtain Airbags | No | No |
| Rear Side Airbags | No | No |
| Security Alarm | Yes | Yes |
| Door Locking | Central Locking | Central Locking |
| Engine Immobilizer | — | No |
| Comfort & Convenience | ||
| Air Conditioning | Automatic Climate Control | Single Zone Automatic |
| Rear A/C Vents | No | No |
| Seat Material | Leather | Fabric |
| Parking Brake | Manual | Manual |
| Key Type | Keyless Entry | Keyless Entry |
| Push-Button Start | No | No |
| Cruise Control | No | Yes |
| Multi-Info Display | Yes | No |
| Paddle Shifters | No | No |
| Reverse Camera | No | No |
| Auto Headlights | No | No |
| Power Windows | Yes | Yes |
| Power Seats | No | Yes |
| Remote Trunk Release | No | No |
| Eco Mode | No | No |
| Antenna | yes | yes |
| Infotainment & Audio | ||
| Touchscreen | Yes | No |
| Navigation | No | No |
| Bluetooth | Yes | No |
| Apple CarPlay | No | No |
| Android Auto | No | No |
| USB | Yes | Yes |
| AUX Input | Yes | Yes |
| AM/FM Radio | Yes | Yes |
| CD Player | Yes | Yes |
| DVD Player | No | No |
| MP3 Playback | Yes | Yes |
| iPod Support | No | Yes |
| SD Card Slot | No | No |
| Speakers | — | 6 |
| Lighting | ||
| Headlights | HID + Foglamps | Halogen |
| Fog Lights | Yes | Yes |
| Daytime Running Lights | — | No |
Mazda 3 Sedan SkyActiv-R AT (2015) vs Ford Ranger XLT 2.2L 4×2 MT (2017): which should you buy?
For a Filipino buyer choosing between the 2015 Mazda 3 Sedan (₱1,248,000) and the 2017 Ford Ranger XLT (₱1,219,000), the decision hinges on lifestyle needs. The Mazda 3 is a compact sedan with a 2.0L naturally aspirated gas engine (155 PS, 200 Nm) paired to a smooth 6-speed automatic, ideal for daily city commuting and highway cruising. It offers a comfortable unibody ride and lower running costs with gas, but lacks cargo versatility. The Ranger is a body-on-frame pickup with a 2.2L turbo diesel (160 PS, 385 Nm) and 6-speed manual, delivering massive low-end torque for hauling, towing, or off-road use. Its RWD layout and longer wheelbase (5277 mm vs 4580 mm) make it better for provincial roads or work duties, though the manual transmission may be less convenient in heavy traffic. Price-wise, the Ranger is slightly cheaper. If you prioritize comfort, efficiency, and daily driving, get the Mazda 3. If you need a rugged workhorse for cargo, towing, or light off-roading, choose the Ranger. Both are discontinued but remain popular in the secondhand market.
Frequently asked questions
Which vehicle is cheaper?
The Ford Ranger XLT is cheaper at ₱1,219,000 compared to the Mazda 3 Sedan at ₱1,248,000, a difference of ₱29,000.
Which has more power?
The Ford Ranger produces 160 PS and 385 Nm, while the Mazda 3 makes 155 PS and 200 Nm. The Ranger has higher torque, making it feel more powerful for hauling.
Which is better for daily commuting?
The Mazda 3 is better for daily commuting due to its automatic transmission, lighter unibody construction, and gas engine, which provide a smoother and more comfortable ride in city traffic.
Which has a bigger engine?
The Ford Ranger has a larger 2.2L (2198cc) turbo diesel engine, while the Mazda 3 has a 2.0L (1998cc) naturally aspirated gas engine.