Mazda BT-50 2.2L 4×2 MT Dsl (2015) vs Ford Ranger XLT 2.2L 4×2 MT (2017)
A full spec-by-spec comparison of Mazda BT-50 2.2L 4×2 MT Dsl (2015) vs Ford Ranger XLT 2.2L 4×2 MT (2017) — engine, performance, dimensions, features and price, with the differences highlighted to help you decide.
| Specification | Mazda BT-50 2.2L 4×2 MT Dsl (2015) Mazda ₱1,300,000 | Ford Ranger XLT 2.2L 4×2 MT (2017) Ford ₱1,219,000 |
|---|---|---|
| Overview | ||
| Model Year | 2015 | 2017 |
| Warranty | 100,000km/3-years | 100,000km/3-years |
| Availability | Discontinued | Discontinued |
| Engine & Drivetrain | ||
| Engine Type | Inline-4 | Inline-4 |
| Displacement | 2184cc | 2198cc |
| Valvetrain | DOHC 16-valve | DOHC 16-valve |
| Aspiration | VGT Intercooler CRDI | Turbocharged |
| Fuel Type | Diesel | Diesel |
| Max Power | 150 PS @ 3700 rpm | 160 PS @ 3200 rpm |
| Max Torque | 375 Nm @ 1500-2500 rpm | 385 Nm @ 1600-2500 rpm |
| Transmission | 6-Speed M/T | 6-Speed M/T |
| Drivetrain | RWD | RWD |
| Body & Dimensions | ||
| Body Type | Pickup | Pick Up |
| Segment | Pickup | Pick-Up |
| Construction | Body-on-frame | Body On Frame |
| Doors | 4 | 4 |
| Seating Capacity | 2+3 | 2+3 |
| Length (mm) | 5365 | 5277 |
| Width (mm) | 1850 | 2163 |
| Height (mm) | 1815 | 1821 |
| Wheelbase (mm) | 3220 | 3220 |
| Curb Weight (kg) | 1944 | — |
| Fuel Tank (L) | — | 80 |
| Chassis, Wheels & Brakes | ||
| Front Suspension | Double Wishbone | Double Wishbone with Coil Spring |
| Rear Suspension | Rigid Axle | Leaf Spring |
| Front Wheels | 17x8.0" Alloys | 17" Alloys |
| Rear Wheels | 17x8.0" Alloys | 17" Alloys |
| Front Tires | 265/65/R17 | 265/65 R17 |
| Rear Tires | 265/65/R17 | 265/65 R17 |
| Front Brakes | Disc | Disc |
| Rear Brakes | Drum | Drum |
| Steering Type | hydraulic | EPS |
| Steering Column | tilt | — |
| Tire Pressure Monitoring | No | No |
| Differential Lock | No | No |
| Safety | ||
| Anti-lock Braking (ABS) | Yes | Yes |
| Electronic Brakeforce Distribution | Yes | Yes |
| Brake Assist | Yes | No |
| Parking Sensors | No | No |
| Stability Control | No | Yes |
| Traction Control | No | Yes |
| Vehicle Dynamic Control | No | No |
| Forward Collision Mitigation | No | No |
| Blind Spot Warning | No | No |
| Hill Start Assist | No | Yes |
| Hill Descent Control | No | Yes |
| Auto Stop/Start | No | No |
| Driver Airbag | No | Yes |
| Knee Airbag | No | Yes |
| Passenger Airbag | No | Yes |
| Front Curtain Airbags | No | No |
| Rear Curtain Airbags | No | No |
| Rear Side Airbags | No | No |
| Engine Immobilizer | — | No |
| Security Alarm | — | Yes |
| Door Locking | — | Central Locking |
| Comfort & Convenience | ||
| Air Conditioning | Manual Aircon | Single Zone Automatic |
| Rear A/C Vents | No | No |
| Seat Material | Leather | Fabric |
| Parking Brake | Manual | Manual |
| Push-Button Start | No | No |
| Cruise Control | No | Yes |
| Multi-Info Display | Yes | No |
| Paddle Shifters | No | No |
| Reverse Camera | No | No |
| Auto Headlights | No | No |
| Power Windows | Yes | Yes |
| Power Seats | No | Yes |
| Remote Trunk Release | No | No |
| Eco Mode | No | No |
| Antenna | yes | yes |
| Key Type | — | Keyless Entry |
| Infotainment & Audio | ||
| Touchscreen | No | No |
| Navigation | No | No |
| Bluetooth | Yes | No |
| Apple CarPlay | No | No |
| Android Auto | No | No |
| USB | Yes | Yes |
| AUX Input | Yes | Yes |
| AM/FM Radio | Yes | Yes |
| CD Player | Yes | Yes |
| DVD Player | No | No |
| MP3 Playback | Yes | Yes |
| iPod Support | No | Yes |
| SD Card Slot | No | No |
| Speakers | — | 6 |
| Lighting | ||
| Headlights | Halogen + Foglamps | Halogen |
| Fog Lights | Yes | Yes |
| Daytime Running Lights | — | No |
Mazda BT-50 2.2L 4×2 MT Dsl (2015) vs Ford Ranger XLT 2.2L 4×2 MT (2017): which should you buy?
The Ford Ranger XLT (₱1,219,000) is the better value for most Filipino buyers, especially for daily commuting or light hauling. It offers 160 PS vs. 150 PS and 385 Nm vs. 375 Nm of torque, making it slightly more powerful. Both vehicles are discontinued, have identical 100,000km/3-year warranties, and share the same 6-speed manual transmission, 4-door pickup configuration, and 2+3 seating. The Ranger’s higher power edge justifies the ₱90,000 premium for tasks requiring more pulling force. The Mazda BT-50 is a capable option but costs ₱90,000 more and has slightly lower torque, making it better suited for heavier loads where every extra horsepower matters. For budget-conscious buyers prioritizing pure economy, the Ranger is the clearer choice. Given the identical practicality metrics (body-on-frame, same doors, seating, length), the power differential is the decisive factor.
Frequently asked questions
Which is cheaper?
The Ford Ranger XLT costs ₱1,219,000, while the Mazda BT-50 costs ₱1,300,000.
Which is more powerful?
The Ford Ranger XLT delivers 160 PS vs. 150 PS, with 385 Nm vs. 375 Nm of torque.
Which is better for daily commuting?
The Ford Ranger XLT’s 160 PS and 385 Nm make it slightly better for daily commutes compared to the Mazda BT-50’s 150 PS and 375 Nm.
Are the warranties identical?
Yes, both vehicles have a 100,000km/3-year warranty.