Mazda BT-50 3.2L 4×4 AT Dsl (2015) vs Nissan NV350 Urvan Standard M/T (2018)
A full spec-by-spec comparison of Mazda BT-50 3.2L 4×4 AT Dsl (2015) vs Nissan NV350 Urvan Standard M/T (2018) — engine, performance, dimensions, features and price, with the differences highlighted to help you decide.
| Specification | Mazda BT-50 3.2L 4×4 AT Dsl (2015) Mazda ₱1,490,000 |
Nissan NV350 Urvan Standard M/T (2018)
Nissan
₱1,570,000
|
|---|---|---|
| Overview | ||
| Model Year | 2015 | 2018 |
| Warranty | 100,000km/3-years | 3-years/ 100,000km |
| Availability | Discontinued | Current |
| Engine & Drivetrain | ||
| Engine Type | Inline-5 | Inline-4 |
| Displacement | 3189cc | 2488cc |
| Valvetrain | DOHC 20-valve | DOHC 16-valve |
| Aspiration | VGT Intercooler CRDI | Turbocharged |
| Fuel Type | Diesel | Diesel |
| Max Power | 200 PS @ 3000 rpm | 129 PS @ 3200 rpm |
| Max Torque | 470 Nm @ 1500-2750 rpm | 356 Nm @ 1400 - 2000 rpm |
| Transmission | 6-Speed A/T | 5-Speed M/T |
| Drivetrain | RWD | RWD |
| Compression Ratio | — | 15:1 |
| Body & Dimensions | ||
| Body Type | Pickup | Van |
| Segment | Pickup | Van |
| Construction | Body-on-frame | Body on Frame |
| Doors | 4 | 3 |
| Seating Capacity | 2+3 | 15 |
| Length (mm) | 5365 | 4695 |
| Width (mm) | 1850 | 1695 |
| Height (mm) | 1815 | 1990 |
| Wheelbase (mm) | 3220 | 2555 |
| Curb Weight (kg) | 2003 | 2076 |
| Exterior Colors | — | Gun Metallic, Brilliant Silver, Pearl White, Alpine White, Topaz Brown, Graphite Black |
| Fuel Tank (L) | — | 65 |
| Chassis, Wheels & Brakes | ||
| Front Suspension | Double Wishbone | Torsion Beam |
| Rear Suspension | Rigid Axle | Rigid Axle, Leaf Spring |
| Front Wheels | 17x8.0" Alloys | 15 steel |
| Rear Wheels | 17x8.0" Alloys | 15 steel |
| Front Tires | 265/65/R17 | 195/70/R15 |
| Rear Tires | 265/65/R17 | 195/70/R15 |
| Front Brakes | Disc | Disc |
| Rear Brakes | Drum | Drum |
| Steering Type | hydraulic | Hydraulic |
| Steering Column | tilt | Tilt |
| Tire Pressure Monitoring | No | No |
| Differential Lock | No | No |
| Safety | ||
| Anti-lock Braking (ABS) | Yes | Yes |
| Electronic Brakeforce Distribution | Yes | Yes |
| Brake Assist | Yes | No |
| Parking Sensors | No | No |
| Stability Control | No | No |
| Traction Control | No | No |
| Vehicle Dynamic Control | No | No |
| Forward Collision Mitigation | No | No |
| Blind Spot Warning | No | No |
| Hill Start Assist | No | No |
| Hill Descent Control | No | No |
| Auto Stop/Start | No | No |
| Driver Airbag | No | No |
| Knee Airbag | No | No |
| Passenger Airbag | No | No |
| Front Curtain Airbags | No | No |
| Rear Curtain Airbags | No | No |
| Rear Side Airbags | No | No |
| Security Alarm | Yes | No |
| Door Locking | Central Locking | Central Locking |
| Engine Immobilizer | — | No |
| Comfort & Convenience | ||
| Air Conditioning | Automatic Climate Control | Manual Aircon w/ rear independent controls |
| Rear A/C Vents | No | No |
| Seat Material | Leather | Fabric |
| Parking Brake | Manual | Manual |
| Key Type | Keyless Entry | Keyless Entry |
| Push-Button Start | No | No |
| Cruise Control | No | No |
| Multi-Info Display | Yes | Yes |
| Paddle Shifters | No | No |
| Reverse Camera | No | No |
| Auto Headlights | No | No |
| Power Windows | Yes | Yes |
| Power Seats | No | No |
| Remote Trunk Release | No | No |
| Eco Mode | No | No |
| Antenna | yes | yes |
| Infotainment & Audio | ||
| Touchscreen | No | No |
| Navigation | No | No |
| Bluetooth | Yes | No |
| Apple CarPlay | No | No |
| Android Auto | No | No |
| USB | Yes | No |
| AUX Input | Yes | No |
| AM/FM Radio | Yes | No |
| CD Player | Yes | No |
| DVD Player | No | No |
| MP3 Playback | Yes | No |
| iPod Support | No | No |
| SD Card Slot | No | No |
| Speakers | — | 4 |
| Lighting | ||
| Headlights | Halogen + Foglamps | Halogen |
| Fog Lights | Yes | Yes |
| Daytime Running Lights | — | No |
Mazda BT-50 3.2L 4×4 AT Dsl (2015) vs Nissan NV350 Urvan Standard M/T (2018): which should you buy?
For a Filipino buyer who needs a rugged, off‑road capable vehicle with higher towing capacity and a diesel engine that delivers 200 PS at 3000 rpm, the Mazda BT‑50 3.2L 4×4 AT is the better choice. It offers a more powerful engine, higher torque (470 Nm), and a 6‑speed automatic transmission that eases driving in varied terrains. Its body‑on‑frame construction and 4‑door layout make it suitable for families or small businesses that require a pickup’s versatility. The Mazda is priced at ₱1,490,000 and comes with a 100 000‑km/3‑year warranty. Conversely, the Nissan NV350 Urvan Standard M/T is a 5‑door van with a smaller 2488cc turbocharged diesel engine producing only 129 PS and 356 Nm torque, better suited for daily commuting or light cargo transport. It is slightly more expensive at ₱1,570,000 and offers a 5‑speed manual gearbox. If your priority is daily passenger comfort or cargo space in a van shape, the Nissan is preferable; if you need a powerful pickup for work or adventure, choose the Mazda.
Frequently asked questions
Which vehicle is cheaper?
The Mazda BT‑50 costs ₱1,490,000 while the Nissan NV350 Urvan is priced at ₱1,570,000.
Which has more power?
The Mazda BT‑50 delivers 200 PS at 3000 rpm, compared to the Nissan’s 129 PS at 3200 rpm.
Which is better for off‑road or towing?
The Mazda BT‑50’s 4×4 drivetrain, higher torque (470 Nm), and pickup body make it more suitable for off‑road or towing tasks.
Which is better for daily commuting?
The Nissan NV350 Urvan’s van body, 5‑door layout, and lower power output make it more practical for daily commuting or light cargo transport.