Mazda CX-5 2.0 SkyActiv Maxx AT (2015) vs Ford Ranger Wildtrak 2.2L 4×2 MT (2017)
A full spec-by-spec comparison of Mazda CX-5 2.0 SkyActiv Maxx AT (2015) vs Ford Ranger Wildtrak 2.2L 4×2 MT (2017) — engine, performance, dimensions, features and price, with the differences highlighted to help you decide.
| Specification | Mazda CX-5 2.0 SkyActiv Maxx AT (2015) Mazda ₱1,345,000 | Ford Ranger Wildtrak 2.2L 4×2 MT (2017) Ford ₱1,328,000 |
|---|---|---|
| Overview | ||
| Model Year | 2015 | 2017 |
| Warranty | 100,000km/3-years | 100,000km/3-years |
| Availability | Discontinued | Current |
| Engine & Drivetrain | ||
| Engine Type | Inline-4 | Inline-4 |
| Displacement | 1988cc | 2198cc |
| Valvetrain | DOHC 16-valve | DOHC 16-valve |
| Aspiration | Naturally Aspirated, i-STOP | Turbocharged |
| Fuel Type | Gas | Diesel |
| Max Power | 155 PS @ 6000 rpm | 160 PS @ 3200 rpm |
| Max Torque | 200 Nm @ 4000 rpm | 385 Nm @ 1600-2500 rpm |
| Transmission | 6-Speed A/T | 6-Speed M/T |
| Drivetrain | FWD | RWD |
| Body & Dimensions | ||
| Body Type | SUV | Pick Up |
| Segment | J | Pick-Up |
| Construction | Unibody | — |
| Doors | 5 | 4 |
| Seating Capacity | 2+3 | 2+3 |
| Length (mm) | 4540 | 5277 |
| Width (mm) | 1840 | 2163 |
| Height (mm) | 1670 | 1821 |
| Wheelbase (mm) | 2700 | 3220 |
| Curb Weight (kg) | 1451 | — |
| Fuel Tank (L) | — | 80 |
| Chassis, Wheels & Brakes | ||
| Front Suspension | MacPherson Strut | Double Wishbone with Coil Spring |
| Rear Suspension | Multi-Link | Leaf Spring |
| Front Wheels | 17x7.0 alloys | 18 |
| Rear Wheels | 17x7.0 alloys | 18 |
| Front Tires | 225/65/R17 | 265/60 R18 |
| Rear Tires | 225/65/R17 | 265/60 R18 |
| Front Brakes | Disc | Disc |
| Rear Brakes | Disc | Drum |
| Steering Type | hydraulic | EPS |
| Steering Column | tilt | — |
| Tire Pressure Monitoring | No | No |
| Differential Lock | No | No |
| Safety | ||
| Anti-lock Braking (ABS) | Yes | Yes |
| Electronic Brakeforce Distribution | Yes | Yes |
| Brake Assist | Yes | Yes |
| Parking Sensors | No | Yes |
| Stability Control | No | Yes |
| Traction Control | No | Yes |
| Vehicle Dynamic Control | No | No |
| Forward Collision Mitigation | No | No |
| Blind Spot Warning | No | No |
| Hill Start Assist | No | Yes |
| Hill Descent Control | No | Yes |
| Auto Stop/Start | No | No |
| Driver Airbag | No | Yes |
| Knee Airbag | No | Yes |
| Passenger Airbag | No | Yes |
| Front Curtain Airbags | No | Yes |
| Rear Curtain Airbags | No | Yes |
| Rear Side Airbags | No | Yes |
| Security Alarm | Yes | Yes |
| Door Locking | Central Locking | Central Locking |
| Engine Immobilizer | — | No |
| Comfort & Convenience | ||
| Air Conditioning | Manual Aircon | Dual-zone EATC |
| Rear A/C Vents | No | Yes |
| Seat Material | Fabric | Leather |
| Parking Brake | Manual | Manual |
| Key Type | Keyless Entry | Keyless Entry |
| Push-Button Start | No | No |
| Cruise Control | No | Yes |
| Multi-Info Display | Yes | Yes |
| Paddle Shifters | No | No |
| Reverse Camera | No | Yes |
| Auto Headlights | No | Yes |
| Power Windows | Yes | Yes |
| Power Seats | No | Yes |
| Remote Trunk Release | No | No |
| Eco Mode | No | No |
| Antenna | yes | yes |
| Infotainment & Audio | ||
| Touchscreen | No | Yes |
| Navigation | No | No |
| Bluetooth | Yes | Yes |
| Apple CarPlay | No | No |
| Android Auto | No | No |
| USB | Yes | Yes |
| AUX Input | Yes | Yes |
| AM/FM Radio | Yes | Yes |
| CD Player | Yes | Yes |
| DVD Player | No | No |
| MP3 Playback | Yes | Yes |
| iPod Support | No | Yes |
| SD Card Slot | No | No |
| Speakers | — | 6 |
| Lighting | ||
| Headlights | Halogen | HID |
| Fog Lights | Yes | Yes |
| Daytime Running Lights | — | No |
Mazda CX-5 2.0 SkyActiv Maxx AT (2015) vs Ford Ranger Wildtrak 2.2L 4×2 MT (2017): which should you buy?
Both the 2015 Mazda CX‑5 2.0 SkyActiv Maxx AT and the 2017 Ford Ranger Wildtrak 2.2L 4×2 MT sit in a similar price bracket (₱1,345,000 vs ₱1,328,000) but serve very different needs. The CX‑5 is a compact SUV with front‑wheel drive, a 1.988‑litre naturally‑aspirated engine delivering 155 PS and 200 Nm, and a six‑speed automatic transmission. Its unibody construction, five‑door layout and 4.540 m length make it more maneuverable for city driving and family outings, offering seating for up to five in a comfortable cabin. However, it is discontinued, so parts and service may become harder to source over time. The Ranger Wildtrak is a midsize pickup, rear‑wheel drive, with a larger 2.198‑litre turbo‑diesel that produces 160 PS and a robust 385 Nm of torque, paired to a six‑speed manual. Its 5.277 m length and 2.163 m width give a spacious load bed and higher towing capacity, ideal for work or heavy‑load tasks. It remains in production, ensuring better parts availability. Choose the CX‑5 if you prioritize everyday comfort, compact size and automatic driving in urban settings. Opt for the Ranger if you need higher torque, cargo capability and a vehicle that’s still supported by the manufacturer.
Frequently asked questions
Which vehicle is cheaper?
The Ford Ranger Wildtrak is slightly cheaper at ₱1,328,000 compared to the Mazda CX‑5 at ₱1,345,000.
Which model has more power?
The Ranger’s 2.2 L turbo diesel produces 160 PS, marginally higher than the CX‑5’s 155 PS.
Which offers more torque?
The Ranger delivers 385 Nm of torque, far exceeding the CX‑5’s 200 Nm.
Which is better for daily commuting in the city?
The Mazda CX‑5, with its smaller footprint, front‑wheel drive, automatic transmission and SUV body, is better suited for city commuting and family use.