Mazda CX-5 2.0 SkyActiv Pro AT (2015) vs Nissan NV350 Urvan Standard M/T (2018)
A full spec-by-spec comparison of Mazda CX-5 2.0 SkyActiv Pro AT (2015) vs Nissan NV350 Urvan Standard M/T (2018) — engine, performance, dimensions, features and price, with the differences highlighted to help you decide.
| Specification | Mazda CX-5 2.0 SkyActiv Pro AT (2015) Mazda ₱1,495,000 |
Nissan NV350 Urvan Standard M/T (2018)
Nissan
₱1,570,000
|
|---|---|---|
| Overview | ||
| Model Year | 2015 | 2018 |
| Warranty | 100,000km/3-years | 3-years/ 100,000km |
| Availability | Discontinued | Current |
| Engine & Drivetrain | ||
| Engine Type | Inline-4 | Inline-4 |
| Displacement | 1988cc | 2488cc |
| Valvetrain | DOHC 16-valve | DOHC 16-valve |
| Aspiration | Naturally Aspirated, i-STOP | Turbocharged |
| Fuel Type | Gas | Diesel |
| Max Power | 155 PS @ 6000 rpm | 129 PS @ 3200 rpm |
| Max Torque | 200 Nm @ 4000 rpm | 356 Nm @ 1400 - 2000 rpm |
| Transmission | 6-Speed A/T | 5-Speed M/T |
| Drivetrain | FWD | RWD |
| Compression Ratio | — | 15:1 |
| Body & Dimensions | ||
| Body Type | SUV | Van |
| Segment | J | Van |
| Construction | Unibody | Body on Frame |
| Doors | 5 | 3 |
| Seating Capacity | 2+3 | 15 |
| Length (mm) | 4540 | 4695 |
| Width (mm) | 1840 | 1695 |
| Height (mm) | 1670 | 1990 |
| Wheelbase (mm) | 2700 | 2555 |
| Curb Weight (kg) | 1451 | 2076 |
| Exterior Colors | — | Gun Metallic, Brilliant Silver, Pearl White, Alpine White, Topaz Brown, Graphite Black |
| Fuel Tank (L) | — | 65 |
| Chassis, Wheels & Brakes | ||
| Front Suspension | MacPherson Strut | Torsion Beam |
| Rear Suspension | Multi-Link | Rigid Axle, Leaf Spring |
| Front Wheels | 17x7.0-inch alloys | 15 steel |
| Rear Wheels | 17x7.0-inch alloys | 15 steel |
| Front Tires | 225/65/R17 | 195/70/R15 |
| Rear Tires | 225/65/R17 | 195/70/R15 |
| Front Brakes | Disc | Disc |
| Rear Brakes | Disc | Drum |
| Steering Type | hydraulic | Hydraulic |
| Steering Column | tilt | Tilt |
| Tire Pressure Monitoring | No | No |
| Differential Lock | No | No |
| Safety | ||
| Anti-lock Braking (ABS) | Yes | Yes |
| Electronic Brakeforce Distribution | Yes | Yes |
| Brake Assist | Yes | No |
| Parking Sensors | No | No |
| Stability Control | No | No |
| Traction Control | No | No |
| Vehicle Dynamic Control | No | No |
| Forward Collision Mitigation | No | No |
| Blind Spot Warning | No | No |
| Hill Start Assist | No | No |
| Hill Descent Control | No | No |
| Auto Stop/Start | No | No |
| Driver Airbag | No | No |
| Knee Airbag | No | No |
| Passenger Airbag | No | No |
| Front Curtain Airbags | No | No |
| Rear Curtain Airbags | No | No |
| Rear Side Airbags | No | No |
| Security Alarm | Yes | No |
| Door Locking | Central Locking | Central Locking |
| Engine Immobilizer | — | No |
| Comfort & Convenience | ||
| Air Conditioning | Dual Zone Climate Control | Manual Aircon w/ rear independent controls |
| Rear A/C Vents | No | No |
| Seat Material | Leather | Fabric |
| Parking Brake | Manual | Manual |
| Key Type | Keyless Entry | Keyless Entry |
| Push-Button Start | No | No |
| Cruise Control | No | No |
| Multi-Info Display | Yes | Yes |
| Paddle Shifters | No | No |
| Reverse Camera | No | No |
| Auto Headlights | Yes | No |
| Power Windows | Yes | Yes |
| Power Seats | Yes | No |
| Remote Trunk Release | No | No |
| Eco Mode | No | No |
| Antenna | yes | yes |
| Infotainment & Audio | ||
| Touchscreen | Yes | No |
| Navigation | No | No |
| Bluetooth | Yes | No |
| Apple CarPlay | No | No |
| Android Auto | No | No |
| USB | Yes | No |
| AUX Input | Yes | No |
| AM/FM Radio | Yes | No |
| CD Player | Yes | No |
| DVD Player | No | No |
| MP3 Playback | Yes | No |
| iPod Support | No | No |
| SD Card Slot | No | No |
| Speakers | — | 4 |
| Lighting | ||
| Headlights | LED + Foglamps | Halogen |
| Fog Lights | Yes | Yes |
| Daytime Running Lights | — | No |
Mazda CX-5 2.0 SkyActiv Pro AT (2015) vs Nissan NV350 Urvan Standard M/T (2018): which should you buy?
For a Filipino buyer, the choice between the Mazda CX-5 2.0 SkyActiv Pro AT (2015) and the Nissan NV350 Urvan Standard M/T (2018) depends entirely on your needs. The Mazda CX-5 is a compact SUV with a 2.0L gas engine producing 155 PS and 200 Nm, paired with a 6-speed automatic transmission and front-wheel drive. It offers a refined, car-like driving experience suitable for daily commuting and family use, but it's discontinued and priced at ₱1,495,000. The Nissan NV350 Urvan is a diesel van with a 2.5L turbocharged engine making 129 PS and 356 Nm, mated to a 5-speed manual and rear-wheel drive. It's a current model priced at ₱1,570,000, built on a body-on-frame chassis for durability, ideal for passenger transport or cargo. The CX-5 is better for personal or family use with more power and automatic transmission, while the Urvan is superior for commercial or group transport due to its diesel torque, manual transmission, and van body style. If you prioritize comfort and daily driving, choose the CX-5. If you need a workhorse for carrying people or goods, the Urvan is the practical choice.
Frequently asked questions
Which is cheaper?
The Mazda CX-5 is cheaper at ₱1,495,000 compared to the Nissan NV350 Urvan at ₱1,570,000.
Which is more powerful?
The Mazda CX-5 has higher horsepower at 155 PS, while the Nissan NV350 Urvan has higher torque at 356 Nm.
Which is better for daily commuting?
The Mazda CX-5 is better for daily commuting due to its automatic transmission, car-like handling, and lower fuel consumption from a gas engine.
Which is more practical for carrying passengers or cargo?
The Nissan NV350 Urvan is more practical for carrying passengers or cargo because it is a van with a body-on-frame construction and high torque diesel engine.