Mazda CX-9 3.7 Grand Touring V6 AT (2015) vs Toyota Alphard 3.5 L V6 AT (2015)
A full spec-by-spec comparison of Mazda CX-9 3.7 Grand Touring V6 AT (2015) vs Toyota Alphard 3.5 L V6 AT (2015) — engine, performance, dimensions, features and price, with the differences highlighted to help you decide.
| Specification | Mazda CX-9 3.7 Grand Touring V6 AT (2015) Mazda ₱2,780,000 | Toyota Alphard 3.5 L V6 AT (2015) Toyota ₱3,379,000 |
|---|---|---|
| Overview | ||
| Model Year | 2015 | 2015 |
| Warranty | 100,000km/3-years | 100,000km/3-years |
| Availability | Discontinued | Discontinued |
| Engine & Drivetrain | ||
| Engine Type | V6 | V6 |
| Displacement | 3726cc | 3456cc |
| Valvetrain | DOHC 24-Valve | DOHC 24-valve |
| Aspiration | Naturally Aspirated | Naturally Aspirated, Dual VVT-I |
| Fuel Type | Gas | Gas |
| Max Power | 277 PS @ 6200 rpm | 275 PS @ 6200 rpm |
| Max Torque | 367 Nm @ 4250 rpm | 340 Nm @ 4700 rpm |
| Transmission | 6-Speed A/T | 4-Speed A/T |
| Drivetrain | AWD | FWD |
| Body & Dimensions | ||
| Body Type | SUV | Van |
| Segment | J | M |
| Construction | Unibody | Unibody |
| Doors | 5 | 5 |
| Seating Capacity | 2+3 | 2+2+3 |
| Length (mm) | 5086 | 4850 |
| Width (mm) | 1936 | 1830 |
| Height (mm) | 1728 | 1905 |
| Wheelbase (mm) | 2875 | 2950 |
| Curb Weight (kg) | 2062 | — |
| Chassis, Wheels & Brakes | ||
| Front Suspension | MacPherson | MacPherson |
| Rear Suspension | Multi-Link | Torsion Beam |
| Front Wheels | 20x7.5" Alloys | 16x7.0 |
| Rear Wheels | 20x7.5" Alloys | 16x7.0 |
| Front Tires | 245/50/R20 | 215/45 R16 |
| Rear Tires | 245/50/R20 | 215/45 R16 |
| Front Brakes | Disc | Disc |
| Rear Brakes | Disc | Disc |
| Steering Type | hydraulic | — |
| Steering Column | tilt | tilt |
| Tire Pressure Monitoring | No | No |
| Differential Lock | No | No |
| Safety | ||
| Anti-lock Braking (ABS) | Yes | Yes |
| Electronic Brakeforce Distribution | Yes | Yes |
| Brake Assist | Yes | Yes |
| Parking Sensors | No | Yes |
| Stability Control | No | Yes |
| Traction Control | No | Yes |
| Vehicle Dynamic Control | No | No |
| Forward Collision Mitigation | No | No |
| Blind Spot Warning | No | No |
| Hill Start Assist | No | Yes |
| Hill Descent Control | No | No |
| Auto Stop/Start | No | No |
| Driver Airbag | No | Yes |
| Knee Airbag | No | No |
| Passenger Airbag | No | Yes |
| Front Curtain Airbags | No | Yes |
| Rear Curtain Airbags | No | Yes |
| Rear Side Airbags | No | Yes |
| Security Alarm | Yes | Yes |
| Door Locking | Central Locking | Central Locking |
| Engine Immobilizer | — | Yes |
| Comfort & Convenience | ||
| Air Conditioning | Automatic Climate Control | Automatic Climate Control |
| Rear A/C Vents | No | Yes |
| Seat Material | Leather | Leather |
| Parking Brake | Manual | EPB |
| Key Type | Keyless Entry | Comfort Access Key |
| Push-Button Start | No | Yes |
| Cruise Control | No | Yes |
| Multi-Info Display | Yes | Yes |
| Paddle Shifters | No | No |
| Reverse Camera | No | No |
| Auto Headlights | No | Yes |
| Power Windows | Yes | Yes |
| Power Seats | Yes | Yes |
| Remote Trunk Release | No | No |
| Eco Mode | No | No |
| Antenna | yes | yes |
| Infotainment & Audio | ||
| Touchscreen | No | Yes |
| Navigation | No | Yes |
| Bluetooth | No | Yes |
| Apple CarPlay | No | No |
| Android Auto | No | No |
| USB | No | Yes |
| AUX Input | Yes | Yes |
| AM/FM Radio | Yes | Yes |
| CD Player | Yes | Yes |
| DVD Player | No | Yes |
| MP3 Playback | Yes | Yes |
| iPod Support | No | No |
| SD Card Slot | No | No |
| Speakers | — | 8 |
| Lighting | ||
| Headlights | HID + Foglamps | HID |
| Fog Lights | Yes | Yes |
| Daytime Running Lights | — | No |
Mazda CX-9 3.7 Grand Touring V6 AT (2015) vs Toyota Alphard 3.5 L V6 AT (2015): which should you buy?
Both the 2015 Mazda CX‑9 3.7 Grand Touring V6 and the 2015 Toyota Alphard 3.5 L V6 are discontinued, premium‑priced family vehicles, but they serve different priorities. The CX‑9 costs ₱2,780,000, about ₱600,000 less than the Alphard’s ₱3,379,000, making it the more budget‑friendly option. It also offers a higher output – 277 PS and 367 Nm – and comes with all‑wheel drive, which adds traction for rainy Philippine roads and light off‑road use. Its longer wheelbase (5,086 mm) gives a slightly more spacious cabin, though seating is 2+3, limiting third‑row flexibility. The Alphard, priced higher, is a van‑style MPV with a 2+2+3 layout, providing separate second‑row captain seats that many families prefer for comfort and easier access to the third row. Its front‑wheel‑drive layout is simpler and may yield better fuel economy, but power is marginally lower at 275 PS and 340 Nm. If you need a more powerful, AWD SUV for occasional rugged driving and want to save on purchase price, the Mazda CX‑9 is the better fit. If you prioritize dedicated second‑row seating, a van‑like interior, and are willing to pay the premium, the Toyota Alphard suits you better.
Frequently asked questions
Which vehicle is cheaper?
The Mazda CX‑9 is priced at ₱2,780,000, which is about ₱600,000 less than the Toyota Alphard’s ₱3,379,000.
Which model has more power?
The Mazda CX‑9 produces 277 PS and 367 Nm, slightly higher than the Alphard’s 275 PS and 340 Nm.
Is the Mazda or the Alphard better for rainy road conditions?
The Mazda CX‑9 has all‑wheel drive, giving it better traction on wet or slippery roads compared to the Alphard’s front‑wheel‑drive layout.
Which vehicle offers more flexible seating for a large family?
The Alphard provides a 2+2+3 seating arrangement with captain seats in the second row, while the CX‑9 seats 2+3, making the Alphard more flexible for families needing separate second‑row seats.