Mazda CX-9 3.7 Grand Touring V6 AT (2015) vs Ford Everest 3.2 Titanium Premium 4×4 AT (2017)
A full spec-by-spec comparison of Mazda CX-9 3.7 Grand Touring V6 AT (2015) vs Ford Everest 3.2 Titanium Premium 4×4 AT (2017) — engine, performance, dimensions, features and price, with the differences highlighted to help you decide.
| Specification | Mazda CX-9 3.7 Grand Touring V6 AT (2015) Mazda ₱2,780,000 | Ford Everest 3.2 Titanium Premium 4×4 AT (2017) Ford ₱2,288,000 |
|---|---|---|
| Overview | ||
| Model Year | 2015 | 2017 |
| Warranty | 100,000km/3-years | 100,000km/3-years |
| Availability | Discontinued | Current |
| Engine & Drivetrain | ||
| Engine Type | V6 | Inline-5 |
| Displacement | 3726cc | 3198cc |
| Valvetrain | DOHC 24-Valve | DOHC 20-valve |
| Aspiration | Naturally Aspirated | Turbocharged CRDI |
| Fuel Type | Gas | Diesel |
| Max Power | 277 PS @ 6200 rpm | 200 PS @ 3000 rpm |
| Max Torque | 367 Nm @ 4250 rpm | 470 Nm @ 1750 rpm |
| Transmission | 6-Speed A/T | 6-Speed A/T |
| Drivetrain | AWD | 4WD |
| Body & Dimensions | ||
| Body Type | SUV | SUV |
| Segment | J | J |
| Construction | Unibody | Body-on-frame |
| Doors | 5 | 5 |
| Seating Capacity | 2+3 | 2+3+2 |
| Length (mm) | 5086 | 4893 |
| Width (mm) | 1936 | 1862 |
| Height (mm) | 1728 | 1836 |
| Wheelbase (mm) | 2875 | 2850 |
| Curb Weight (kg) | 2062 | — |
| Chassis, Wheels & Brakes | ||
| Front Suspension | MacPherson | Double Wishbone |
| Rear Suspension | Multi-Link | Live Axle |
| Front Wheels | 20x7.5" Alloys | 20 |
| Rear Wheels | 20x7.5" Alloys | 20 |
| Front Tires | 245/50/R20 | 265/50 R20 |
| Rear Tires | 245/50/R20 | 265/50 R20 |
| Front Brakes | Disc | Disc |
| Rear Brakes | Disc | Disc |
| Steering Type | hydraulic | Hydraulic |
| Steering Column | tilt | tilt |
| Tire Pressure Monitoring | No | No |
| Differential Lock | No | No |
| Safety | ||
| Anti-lock Braking (ABS) | Yes | Yes |
| Electronic Brakeforce Distribution | Yes | Yes |
| Brake Assist | Yes | No |
| Parking Sensors | No | Yes |
| Stability Control | No | Yes |
| Traction Control | No | Yes |
| Vehicle Dynamic Control | No | No |
| Forward Collision Mitigation | No | No |
| Blind Spot Warning | No | No |
| Hill Start Assist | No | Yes |
| Hill Descent Control | No | No |
| Auto Stop/Start | No | No |
| Driver Airbag | No | Yes |
| Knee Airbag | No | No |
| Passenger Airbag | No | Yes |
| Front Curtain Airbags | No | Yes |
| Rear Curtain Airbags | No | Yes |
| Rear Side Airbags | No | Yes |
| Security Alarm | Yes | Yes |
| Door Locking | Central Locking | Central Locking |
| Engine Immobilizer | — | No |
| Comfort & Convenience | ||
| Air Conditioning | Automatic Climate Control | Dual Zone Automatic Climate Control |
| Rear A/C Vents | No | Yes |
| Seat Material | Leather | Leather |
| Parking Brake | Manual | Manual |
| Key Type | Keyless Entry | Keyless Entry |
| Push-Button Start | No | No |
| Cruise Control | No | Yes |
| Multi-Info Display | Yes | Yes |
| Paddle Shifters | No | No |
| Reverse Camera | No | Yes |
| Auto Headlights | No | Yes |
| Power Windows | Yes | Yes |
| Power Seats | Yes | Yes |
| Remote Trunk Release | No | No |
| Eco Mode | No | No |
| Antenna | yes | yes |
| Infotainment & Audio | ||
| Touchscreen | No | Yes |
| Navigation | No | No |
| Bluetooth | No | Yes |
| Apple CarPlay | No | No |
| Android Auto | No | No |
| USB | No | Yes |
| AUX Input | Yes | Yes |
| AM/FM Radio | Yes | Yes |
| CD Player | Yes | Yes |
| DVD Player | No | No |
| MP3 Playback | Yes | Yes |
| iPod Support | No | Yes |
| SD Card Slot | No | No |
| Speakers | — | 10 |
| Lighting | ||
| Headlights | HID + Foglamps | Halogen |
| Fog Lights | Yes | Yes |
| Daytime Running Lights | — | No |
Mazda CX-9 3.7 Grand Touring V6 AT (2015) vs Ford Everest 3.2 Titanium Premium 4×4 AT (2017): which should you buy?
For a Filipino buyer weighing luxury versus utility, the 2015 Mazda CX‑9 Grand Touring V6 and the 2017 Ford Everest Titanium Premium present distinct trade‑offs. The CX‑9 commands a higher price (₱2,780,000) but offers a larger V6 engine (3.7 L, 277 PS, 367 Nm) and all‑wheel drive in a unibody SUV, delivering smoother on‑road dynamics and a more premium feel. Its longer wheelbase (5,086 mm) and 2+3 seating layout suit families that prioritize comfort over maximum passenger count. Conversely, the Everest is ₱492,000 cheaper (₱2,288,000), uses a turbocharged 3.2 L inline‑5 diesel (200 PS, 470 Nm) with stronger low‑end torque, and sits on a body‑on‑frame chassis, making it better suited for rougher roads and occasional off‑road use. Its 4WD system, three‑row seating (2+3+2), and shorter length (4,893 mm) improve maneuverability in city traffic while still offering ample space. Both carry the same 100,000 km/3‑year warranty. Choose the Mazda if you value higher power, a more refined ride, and are willing to pay a premium for a discontinued, upscale SUV. Opt for the Ford if you need a more affordable, torque‑rich vehicle with better off‑road capability and extra seating for larger families.
Frequently asked questions
Which model is cheaper?
The 2017 Ford Everest Titanium Premium 4×4 AT is priced at ₱2,288,000, which is ₱492,000 less than the 2015 Mazda CX‑9 Grand Touring V6 AT priced at ₱2,780,000.
Which SUV has more power?
The Mazda CX‑9 has a higher maximum power output of 277 PS at 6,200 rpm, compared to the Ford Everest’s 200 PS at 3,000 rpm.
Which vehicle offers more torque for low‑rpm driving?
The Ford Everest’s turbocharged diesel engine delivers 470 Nm at 1,750 rpm, surpassing the Mazda CX‑9’s 367 Nm at 4,250 rpm, making the Everest stronger at low revs.
Which SUV is better suited for off‑road or rough road conditions?
The Ford Everest uses a body‑on‑frame construction and 4WD drivetrain, which generally provides better durability and off‑road capability than the Mazda CX‑9’s unibody AWD setup.