Mitsubishi ASX 2.0 GSR CVT (2015) vs Nissan NV350 Urvan Cargo (2015)
A full spec-by-spec comparison of Mitsubishi ASX 2.0 GSR CVT (2015) vs Nissan NV350 Urvan Cargo (2015) — engine, performance, dimensions, features and price, with the differences highlighted to help you decide.
| Specification | Mitsubishi ASX 2.0 GSR CVT (2015) Mitsubishi ₱1,263,000 | Nissan NV350 Urvan Cargo (2015) Nissan ₱1,158,000 |
|---|---|---|
| Overview | ||
| Model Year | 2015 | 2015 |
| Warranty | 100,000km/3-years | 100,000km/3-years |
| Availability | Not available | Discontinued |
| Engine & Drivetrain | ||
| Engine Type | Inline-4 | Inline-4 |
| Displacement | 1998cc | 2488cc |
| Valvetrain | DOHC 16-valve | DOHC 16-valve |
| Compression Ratio | 10 : 1 | — |
| Aspiration | Naturally Aspirated, MIVEC | Variable Turbocharger (VGS) |
| Fuel Type | Gas | Diesel |
| Max Power | 150 PS @ 6000 rpm | 129 PS @ 3200 rpm |
| Max Torque | 197 Nm @ 4200 rpm | 356 Nm @ 1400-2000 rpm |
| Transmission | CVT | 5-Speed M/T (Dash-Mounted) |
| Drivetrain | FWD | — |
| Performance & Economy | ||
| Emission Standard | Euro-4 | — |
| Body & Dimensions | ||
| Body Type | SUV | Van |
| Segment | J | M |
| Construction | Unibody | — |
| Doors | 5 | 4 |
| Seating Capacity | 5 | 3 |
| Length (mm) | 4295 | 5080 |
| Width (mm) | 1770 | 1695 |
| Height (mm) | 1625 | 2285 |
| Wheelbase (mm) | 2670 | 2940 |
| Curb Weight (kg) | 1350 | 1825 |
| Fuel Tank (L) | 63 | 65 |
| Chassis, Wheels & Brakes | ||
| Front Suspension | MacPherson Strut Coil Spring with Stabilizer | Torsion Bar with Front Stabilizer |
| Rear Suspension | Multi-Link Coil Spring with Stabilizer | Leaf Spring |
| Front Wheels | 17x6.5" Alloys | 15 |
| Rear Wheels | 17x6.5" Alloys | 15 |
| Front Tires | 215/60 R17 | 195/80R15LT |
| Rear Tires | 215/60 R17 | 195/80R15LT |
| Front Brakes | Disc | — |
| Rear Brakes | Disc | Drum |
| Steering Type | Electronic | Power Steering |
| Steering Column | tilt and telescopic | Manual Tilt |
| Tire Pressure Monitoring | Yes | No |
| Differential Lock | No | No |
| Safety | ||
| Anti-lock Braking (ABS) | Yes | No |
| Electronic Brakeforce Distribution | Yes | No |
| Brake Assist | Yes | No |
| Parking Sensors | Yes | No |
| Stability Control | No | No |
| Traction Control | No | No |
| Vehicle Dynamic Control | No | No |
| Forward Collision Mitigation | No | No |
| Blind Spot Warning | No | No |
| Hill Start Assist | No | No |
| Hill Descent Control | No | No |
| Auto Stop/Start | No | No |
| Driver Airbag | Yes | Yes |
| Knee Airbag | No | No |
| Passenger Airbag | Yes | No |
| Front Curtain Airbags | No | No |
| Rear Curtain Airbags | No | No |
| Rear Side Airbags | No | No |
| Engine Immobilizer | Yes | No |
| Security Alarm | Yes | No |
| Door Locking | Central Locking | Standard |
| Comfort & Convenience | ||
| Air Conditioning | Automatic Climate Control | Manual, Dial Type |
| Rear A/C Vents | No | Yes |
| Seat Material | Leather | Fabric |
| Parking Brake | Manual | Manual |
| Key Type | Keyless Entry | Manual |
| Push-Button Start | Yes | No |
| Cruise Control | Yes | No |
| Multi-Info Display | Yes | No |
| Paddle Shifters | Yes | No |
| Reverse Camera | Yes | No |
| Auto Headlights | Yes | No |
| Power Windows | Yes | Yes |
| Power Seats | No | No |
| Remote Trunk Release | No | No |
| Eco Mode | No | No |
| Antenna | yes | yes |
| Roadside Assistance | no | — |
| Infotainment & Audio | ||
| Speakers | 6 | 2 |
| Touchscreen | Yes | No |
| Navigation | Yes | No |
| Bluetooth | Yes | No |
| Apple CarPlay | Yes | No |
| Android Auto | Yes | No |
| USB | Yes | No |
| AUX Input | Yes | No |
| AM/FM Radio | Yes | No |
| CD Player | Yes | No |
| DVD Player | Yes | No |
| MP3 Playback | Yes | No |
| iPod Support | Yes | No |
| SD Card Slot | Yes | No |
| Lighting | ||
| Headlights | HID | Halogen |
| Fog Lights | Yes | Yes |
| Daytime Running Lights | Yes | No |
Mitsubishi ASX 2.0 GSR CVT (2015) vs Nissan NV350 Urvan Cargo (2015): which should you buy?
The Mitsubishi ASX 2.0 GSR CVT (2015) and the Nissan NV350 Urvan Cargo (2015) serve very different needs, so the choice hinges on intended use. The ASX is a compact SUV priced at ₱1,263,000, offering a 150 PS naturally‑aspirated 2.0‑L engine, CVT, and front‑wheel drive, making it more suitable for families or individuals seeking a comfortable, on‑road vehicle with better acceleration and a modern transmission. Its unibody construction, five doors and typical SUV dimensions give it a car‑like ride and easier city maneuverability. In contrast, the NV350 Cargo costs ₱1,158,000, about ₱105,000 less, but is a van with a larger 2.5‑L turbo‑charged diesel delivering 129 PS and a hefty 356 Nm of torque at low revs, ideal for heavy loads and commercial use. Its 5‑speed manual, four doors, and cargo‑focused interior make it practical for transporting goods, though its seating is limited to three and its dimensions (5.08 m long, 2.285 m high) reduce urban agility. Both carry the same warranty (100,000 km/3 years). If you need a versatile passenger vehicle for daily commuting, weekend trips, and occasional cargo, the ASX is the better pick despite the higher price. If your priority is low‑cost, high‑torque hauling capacity for a business, the NV350 Cargo offers more practicality and fuel‑efficient diesel power at a lower upfront cost.
Frequently asked questions
Which vehicle is cheaper?
The Nissan NV350 Urvan Cargo is cheaper at ₱1,158,000 compared to the Mitsubishi ASX at ₱1,263,000.
Which model has more power?
The Mitsubishi ASX produces 150 PS, while the NV350 Cargo produces 129 PS, so the ASX is more powerful.
Is the ASX better for daily commuting?
Yes, the ASX’s SUV body, CVT transmission and front‑wheel drive provide a smoother, more car‑like ride suited for daily commuting.
Which vehicle is more suitable for cargo or commercial use?
The NV350 Cargo, with its larger diesel engine, higher torque, manual transmission and van body, is designed for cargo and commercial applications.