Mitsubishi ASX 2.0 GSR CVT (2015) vs Nissan NV350 Urvan Cargo (2015)

A full spec-by-spec comparison of Mitsubishi ASX 2.0 GSR CVT (2015) vs Nissan NV350 Urvan Cargo (2015) — engine, performance, dimensions, features and price, with the differences highlighted to help you decide.

Specification Mitsubishi ASX 2.0 GSR CVT (2015) Mitsubishi ₱1,263,000 Nissan NV350 Urvan Cargo (2015) Nissan ₱1,158,000
Overview
Model Year 2015 2015
Warranty 100,000km/3-years 100,000km/3-years
Availability Not available Discontinued
Engine & Drivetrain
Engine Type Inline-4 Inline-4
Displacement 1998cc 2488cc
Valvetrain DOHC 16-valve DOHC 16-valve
Compression Ratio 10 : 1
Aspiration Naturally Aspirated, MIVEC Variable Turbocharger (VGS)
Fuel Type Gas Diesel
Max Power 150 PS @ 6000 rpm 129 PS @ 3200 rpm
Max Torque 197 Nm @ 4200 rpm 356 Nm @ 1400-2000 rpm
Transmission CVT 5-Speed M/T (Dash-Mounted)
Drivetrain FWD
Performance & Economy
Emission Standard Euro-4
Body & Dimensions
Body Type SUV Van
Segment J M
Construction Unibody
Doors 5 4
Seating Capacity 5 3
Length (mm) 4295 5080
Width (mm) 1770 1695
Height (mm) 1625 2285
Wheelbase (mm) 2670 2940
Curb Weight (kg) 1350 1825
Fuel Tank (L) 63 65
Chassis, Wheels & Brakes
Front Suspension MacPherson Strut Coil Spring with Stabilizer Torsion Bar with Front Stabilizer
Rear Suspension Multi-Link Coil Spring with Stabilizer Leaf Spring
Front Wheels 17x6.5" Alloys 15
Rear Wheels 17x6.5" Alloys 15
Front Tires 215/60 R17 195/80R15LT
Rear Tires 215/60 R17 195/80R15LT
Front Brakes Disc
Rear Brakes Disc Drum
Steering Type Electronic Power Steering
Steering Column tilt and telescopic Manual Tilt
Tire Pressure Monitoring Yes No
Differential Lock No No
Safety
Anti-lock Braking (ABS) Yes No
Electronic Brakeforce Distribution Yes No
Brake Assist Yes No
Parking Sensors Yes No
Stability Control No No
Traction Control No No
Vehicle Dynamic Control No No
Forward Collision Mitigation No No
Blind Spot Warning No No
Hill Start Assist No No
Hill Descent Control No No
Auto Stop/Start No No
Driver Airbag Yes Yes
Knee Airbag No No
Passenger Airbag Yes No
Front Curtain Airbags No No
Rear Curtain Airbags No No
Rear Side Airbags No No
Engine Immobilizer Yes No
Security Alarm Yes No
Door Locking Central Locking Standard
Comfort & Convenience
Air Conditioning Automatic Climate Control Manual, Dial Type
Rear A/C Vents No Yes
Seat Material Leather Fabric
Parking Brake Manual Manual
Key Type Keyless Entry Manual
Push-Button Start Yes No
Cruise Control Yes No
Multi-Info Display Yes No
Paddle Shifters Yes No
Reverse Camera Yes No
Auto Headlights Yes No
Power Windows Yes Yes
Power Seats No No
Remote Trunk Release No No
Eco Mode No No
Antenna yes yes
Roadside Assistance no
Infotainment & Audio
Speakers 6 2
Touchscreen Yes No
Navigation Yes No
Bluetooth Yes No
Apple CarPlay Yes No
Android Auto Yes No
USB Yes No
AUX Input Yes No
AM/FM Radio Yes No
CD Player Yes No
DVD Player Yes No
MP3 Playback Yes No
iPod Support Yes No
SD Card Slot Yes No
Lighting
Headlights HID Halogen
Fog Lights Yes Yes
Daytime Running Lights Yes No
Keep comparing Add another model to this matchup — line up to four side by side.

Mitsubishi ASX 2.0 GSR CVT (2015) vs Nissan NV350 Urvan Cargo (2015): which should you buy?

The Mitsubishi ASX 2.0 GSR CVT (2015) and the Nissan NV350 Urvan Cargo (2015) serve very different needs, so the choice hinges on intended use. The ASX is a compact SUV priced at ₱1,263,000, offering a 150 PS naturally‑aspirated 2.0‑L engine, CVT, and front‑wheel drive, making it more suitable for families or individuals seeking a comfortable, on‑road vehicle with better acceleration and a modern transmission. Its unibody construction, five doors and typical SUV dimensions give it a car‑like ride and easier city maneuverability. In contrast, the NV350 Cargo costs ₱1,158,000, about ₱105,000 less, but is a van with a larger 2.5‑L turbo‑charged diesel delivering 129 PS and a hefty 356 Nm of torque at low revs, ideal for heavy loads and commercial use. Its 5‑speed manual, four doors, and cargo‑focused interior make it practical for transporting goods, though its seating is limited to three and its dimensions (5.08 m long, 2.285 m high) reduce urban agility. Both carry the same warranty (100,000 km/3 years). If you need a versatile passenger vehicle for daily commuting, weekend trips, and occasional cargo, the ASX is the better pick despite the higher price. If your priority is low‑cost, high‑torque hauling capacity for a business, the NV350 Cargo offers more practicality and fuel‑efficient diesel power at a lower upfront cost.

Frequently asked questions

Which vehicle is cheaper?

The Nissan NV350 Urvan Cargo is cheaper at ₱1,158,000 compared to the Mitsubishi ASX at ₱1,263,000.

Which model has more power?

The Mitsubishi ASX produces 150 PS, while the NV350 Cargo produces 129 PS, so the ASX is more powerful.

Is the ASX better for daily commuting?

Yes, the ASX’s SUV body, CVT transmission and front‑wheel drive provide a smoother, more car‑like ride suited for daily commuting.

Which vehicle is more suitable for cargo or commercial use?

The NV350 Cargo, with its larger diesel engine, higher torque, manual transmission and van body, is designed for cargo and commercial applications.