Mitsubishi ASX 2.0 GSR CVT (2015) vs Ford Ranger XLT 2.2L 4×2 MT (2017)
A full spec-by-spec comparison of Mitsubishi ASX 2.0 GSR CVT (2015) vs Ford Ranger XLT 2.2L 4×2 MT (2017) — engine, performance, dimensions, features and price, with the differences highlighted to help you decide.
| Specification | Mitsubishi ASX 2.0 GSR CVT (2015) Mitsubishi ₱1,263,000 | Ford Ranger XLT 2.2L 4×2 MT (2017) Ford ₱1,219,000 |
|---|---|---|
| Overview | ||
| Model Year | 2015 | 2017 |
| Warranty | 100,000km/3-years | 100,000km/3-years |
| Availability | Not available | Discontinued |
| Engine & Drivetrain | ||
| Engine Type | Inline-4 | Inline-4 |
| Displacement | 1998cc | 2198cc |
| Valvetrain | DOHC 16-valve | DOHC 16-valve |
| Compression Ratio | 10 : 1 | — |
| Aspiration | Naturally Aspirated, MIVEC | Turbocharged |
| Fuel Type | Gas | Diesel |
| Max Power | 150 PS @ 6000 rpm | 160 PS @ 3200 rpm |
| Max Torque | 197 Nm @ 4200 rpm | 385 Nm @ 1600-2500 rpm |
| Transmission | CVT | 6-Speed M/T |
| Drivetrain | FWD | RWD |
| Performance & Economy | ||
| Emission Standard | Euro-4 | — |
| Body & Dimensions | ||
| Body Type | SUV | Pick Up |
| Segment | J | Pick-Up |
| Construction | Unibody | Body On Frame |
| Doors | 5 | 4 |
| Seating Capacity | 5 | 2+3 |
| Length (mm) | 4295 | 5277 |
| Width (mm) | 1770 | 2163 |
| Height (mm) | 1625 | 1821 |
| Wheelbase (mm) | 2670 | 3220 |
| Curb Weight (kg) | 1350 | — |
| Fuel Tank (L) | 63 | 80 |
| Chassis, Wheels & Brakes | ||
| Front Suspension | MacPherson Strut Coil Spring with Stabilizer | Double Wishbone with Coil Spring |
| Rear Suspension | Multi-Link Coil Spring with Stabilizer | Leaf Spring |
| Front Wheels | 17x6.5" Alloys | 17" Alloys |
| Rear Wheels | 17x6.5" Alloys | 17" Alloys |
| Front Tires | 215/60 R17 | 265/65 R17 |
| Rear Tires | 215/60 R17 | 265/65 R17 |
| Front Brakes | Disc | Disc |
| Rear Brakes | Disc | Drum |
| Steering Type | Electronic | EPS |
| Steering Column | tilt and telescopic | — |
| Tire Pressure Monitoring | Yes | No |
| Differential Lock | No | No |
| Safety | ||
| Anti-lock Braking (ABS) | Yes | Yes |
| Electronic Brakeforce Distribution | Yes | Yes |
| Brake Assist | Yes | No |
| Parking Sensors | Yes | No |
| Stability Control | No | Yes |
| Traction Control | No | Yes |
| Vehicle Dynamic Control | No | No |
| Forward Collision Mitigation | No | No |
| Blind Spot Warning | No | No |
| Hill Start Assist | No | Yes |
| Hill Descent Control | No | Yes |
| Auto Stop/Start | No | No |
| Driver Airbag | Yes | Yes |
| Knee Airbag | No | Yes |
| Passenger Airbag | Yes | Yes |
| Front Curtain Airbags | No | No |
| Rear Curtain Airbags | No | No |
| Rear Side Airbags | No | No |
| Engine Immobilizer | Yes | No |
| Security Alarm | Yes | Yes |
| Door Locking | Central Locking | Central Locking |
| Comfort & Convenience | ||
| Air Conditioning | Automatic Climate Control | Single Zone Automatic |
| Rear A/C Vents | No | No |
| Seat Material | Leather | Fabric |
| Parking Brake | Manual | Manual |
| Key Type | Keyless Entry | Keyless Entry |
| Push-Button Start | Yes | No |
| Cruise Control | Yes | Yes |
| Multi-Info Display | Yes | No |
| Paddle Shifters | Yes | No |
| Reverse Camera | Yes | No |
| Auto Headlights | Yes | No |
| Power Windows | Yes | Yes |
| Power Seats | No | Yes |
| Remote Trunk Release | No | No |
| Eco Mode | No | No |
| Antenna | yes | yes |
| Roadside Assistance | no | — |
| Infotainment & Audio | ||
| Speakers | 6 | 6 |
| Touchscreen | Yes | No |
| Navigation | Yes | No |
| Bluetooth | Yes | No |
| Apple CarPlay | Yes | No |
| Android Auto | Yes | No |
| USB | Yes | Yes |
| AUX Input | Yes | Yes |
| AM/FM Radio | Yes | Yes |
| CD Player | Yes | Yes |
| DVD Player | Yes | No |
| MP3 Playback | Yes | Yes |
| iPod Support | Yes | Yes |
| SD Card Slot | Yes | No |
| Lighting | ||
| Headlights | HID | Halogen |
| Fog Lights | Yes | Yes |
| Daytime Running Lights | Yes | No |
Mitsubishi ASX 2.0 GSR CVT (2015) vs Ford Ranger XLT 2.2L 4×2 MT (2017): which should you buy?
For a Filipino buyer looking for an affordable, everyday SUV with modern conveniences and a relatively low price tag, the 2015 Mitsubishi ASX 2.0 GSR CVT is the better choice. Priced at ₱1,263,000, it offers a 1998cc naturally aspirated inline‑4 engine that delivers 150 PS at 6000 rpm and 197 Nm of torque at 4200 rpm, coupled with a CVT for smooth city driving. Its front‑wheel drive layout and five‑door configuration make it practical for families or commuters, while the Euro‑4 emission standard keeps it compliant with local regulations. The ASX’s warranty of 100,000 km/3 years is standard for the segment. In contrast, the 2017 Ford Ranger XLT 2.2L 4×2 MT, priced slightly lower at ₱1,219,000, is a diesel‑powered pickup with 160 PS and a high torque of 385 Nm, ideal for heavier hauling or off‑road use. However, its body‑on‑frame construction, rear‑wheel drive and only four doors limit daily practicality for most Filipino households. The Ranger’s 6‑speed manual transmission and discontinued status may also affect resale value and parts availability. Thus, for everyday use, family trips or city commuting, the Mitsubishi ASX offers better convenience and sufficient power. For those needing a workhorse pickup for towing or rugged terrain, the Ford Ranger would be more suitable.
Frequently asked questions
Which vehicle is cheaper?
The Ford Ranger XLT 2.2L 4×2 MT is priced at ₱1,219,000, while the Mitsubishi ASX 2.0 GSR CVT is priced at ₱1,263,000.
Which has more power?
The Mitsubishi ASX produces 150 PS, whereas the Ford Ranger delivers 160 PS; the Ranger also has a higher torque of 385 Nm compared to the ASX’s 197 Nm.
Which is better for daily commuting?
The Mitsubishi ASX, with its CVT transmission, front‑wheel drive, five doors and SUV body type, is more suited for daily commuting and family use.
Which vehicle offers better practicality for hauling or off‑road use?
The Ford Ranger XLT, with its diesel engine, 385 Nm torque, rear‑wheel drive and pickup body type, is better for hauling or off‑road tasks.