Mitsubishi Mirage 1.2 GLX CVT (2015) vs Suzuki Alto 800 0.8 Standard MT (2015)
A full spec-by-spec comparison of Mitsubishi Mirage 1.2 GLX CVT (2015) vs Suzuki Alto 800 0.8 Standard MT (2015) — engine, performance, dimensions, features and price, with the differences highlighted to help you decide.
| Specification | Mitsubishi Mirage 1.2 GLX CVT (2015) Mitsubishi ₱583,000 | Suzuki Alto 800 0.8 Standard MT (2015) Suzuki ₱445,000 |
|---|---|---|
| Overview | ||
| Model Year | 2015 | 2015 |
| Warranty | 100,000km/3-years | 100,000km/3-years |
| Availability | Discontinued | Current |
| Engine & Drivetrain | ||
| Engine Type | Inline-3 | Inline-3 |
| Displacement | 1193cc | 796cc |
| Valvetrain | DOHC 12-valve | SOHC 12-valve |
| Compression Ratio | 10.5 : 1 | — |
| Aspiration | Naturally Aspirated | Naturally Aspirated |
| Fuel Type | Gas | Gas |
| Max Power | 78 PS @ 6000 rpm | 48 PS @ 6200 rpm |
| Max Torque | 100 Nm @ 4000 rpm | 68 Nm @ 3500 rpm |
| Transmission | INVECS-III CVT | 5-Speed M/T |
| Drivetrain | FWD | FWD |
| Body & Dimensions | ||
| Body Type | Hatchback | Hatchback |
| Segment | B | A |
| Construction | Unibody | Unibody |
| Doors | 5 | 5 |
| Seating Capacity | 2+3 | 2+3 |
| Length (mm) | 3710 | 3395 |
| Width (mm) | 1665 | 1490 |
| Height (mm) | 1500 | 1475 |
| Wheelbase (mm) | 2450 | 2360 |
| Curb Weight (kg) | 850 | 725 |
| Fuel Tank (L) | — | 35 |
| Chassis, Wheels & Brakes | ||
| Front Suspension | MacPherson | MacPherson |
| Rear Suspension | Torsion Beam | Multi-link Rigid Axle |
| Front Wheels | 15x5.5" Alloys | 13 |
| Rear Wheels | 15x5.5" Alloys | 13 |
| Front Tires | 175/55 R15 | 145/70 R13 |
| Rear Tires | 175/55 R15 | 145/70 R13 |
| Front Brakes | Disc | Disc |
| Rear Brakes | Drum | Drum |
| Steering Type | hydraulic | — |
| Steering Column | tilt | tilt |
| Tire Pressure Monitoring | No | No |
| Differential Lock | No | No |
| Safety | ||
| Anti-lock Braking (ABS) | Yes | No |
| Electronic Brakeforce Distribution | Yes | No |
| Brake Assist | No | No |
| Parking Sensors | No | No |
| Stability Control | No | No |
| Traction Control | No | No |
| Vehicle Dynamic Control | No | No |
| Forward Collision Mitigation | No | No |
| Blind Spot Warning | No | No |
| Hill Start Assist | No | No |
| Hill Descent Control | No | No |
| Auto Stop/Start | No | No |
| Driver Airbag | Yes | No |
| Knee Airbag | No | No |
| Passenger Airbag | Yes | No |
| Front Curtain Airbags | No | No |
| Rear Curtain Airbags | No | No |
| Rear Side Airbags | No | No |
| Engine Immobilizer | No | No |
| Security Alarm | Yes | No |
| Door Locking | Central Locking | Standard |
| Comfort & Convenience | ||
| Air Conditioning | Automatic Climate Control | Manual Aircon |
| Rear A/C Vents | No | Yes |
| Seat Material | Fabric | Fabric |
| Parking Brake | Manual | Manual |
| Key Type | Keyless Entry | Standard Key |
| Push-Button Start | No | No |
| Cruise Control | No | No |
| Multi-Info Display | Yes | No |
| Paddle Shifters | No | No |
| Reverse Camera | No | No |
| Auto Headlights | No | No |
| Power Windows | Yes | No |
| Power Seats | No | No |
| Remote Trunk Release | No | No |
| Eco Mode | No | No |
| Antenna | yes | yes |
| Infotainment & Audio | ||
| Touchscreen | No | No |
| Navigation | No | No |
| Bluetooth | No | No |
| Apple CarPlay | No | No |
| Android Auto | No | No |
| USB | No | Yes |
| AUX Input | Yes | Yes |
| AM/FM Radio | Yes | Yes |
| CD Player | Yes | Yes |
| DVD Player | No | No |
| MP3 Playback | Yes | Yes |
| iPod Support | No | No |
| SD Card Slot | No | No |
| Speakers | — | 2 |
| Lighting | ||
| Headlights | Halogen | Halogen |
| Fog Lights | Yes | Yes |
| Daytime Running Lights | No | No |
Mitsubishi Mirage 1.2 GLX CVT (2015) vs Suzuki Alto 800 0.8 Standard MT (2015): which should you buy?
For a Filipino buyer weighing cost against performance, the Suzuki Alto 800 Standard MT is the more budget‑friendly option, priced at ₱445,000 versus the Mitsubishi Mirage GLX CVT’s ₱583,000. The Alto’s smaller 796 cc engine delivers 48 PS and 68 Nm, which is modest but sufficient for city driving and keeps fuel consumption low. The Mirage, with a larger 1.2 L engine, offers 78 PS and 100 Nm, giving noticeably better acceleration and highway capability, especially useful for longer trips or carrying heavier loads. Both models share the same three‑year/100,000 km warranty, front‑wheel drive layout, and five‑door hatchback body, but the Mirage’s CVT provides a smoother ride compared to the Alto’s 5‑speed manual. Practicality is similar: both seat five and have unibody construction. If upfront cost and simplicity are top priorities, the Alto is the clear choice. If you need extra power for occasional highway use and prefer an automatic‑type transmission, the Mirage justifies its higher price. Ultimately, city commuters on a tight budget will favor the Alto, while drivers who value performance and a CVT‑like experience should consider the Mirage despite its discontinued status.
Frequently asked questions
Which model is cheaper?
The Suzuki Alto 800 Standard MT costs ₱445,000, which is ₱138,000 less than the Mitsubishi Mirage GLX CVT priced at ₱583,000.
Which car has more power?
The Mitsubishi Mirage GLX CVT produces 78 PS and 100 Nm, whereas the Suzuki Alto 800 delivers 48 PS and 68 Nm, making the Mirage the more powerful option.
Is there a difference in transmission type?
Yes, the Mirage uses an INVECS‑III CVT, while the Alto is equipped with a 5‑speed manual transmission.
Are both cars suitable for daily commuting?
Both are five‑door hatchbacks with front‑wheel drive and similar seating, making them practical for daily use; the Alto is more budget‑friendly, while the Mirage offers better performance for longer or faster commutes.