Mitsubishi Mirage 1.2 GLX MT (2015) vs Suzuki Alto 800 0.8 Standard MT (2015)
A full spec-by-spec comparison of Mitsubishi Mirage 1.2 GLX MT (2015) vs Suzuki Alto 800 0.8 Standard MT (2015) — engine, performance, dimensions, features and price, with the differences highlighted to help you decide.
| Specification | Mitsubishi Mirage 1.2 GLX MT (2015) Mitsubishi ₱533,000 | Suzuki Alto 800 0.8 Standard MT (2015) Suzuki ₱445,000 |
|---|---|---|
| Overview | ||
| Model Year | 2015 | 2015 |
| Warranty | 100,000km/3-years | 100,000km/3-years |
| Availability | Discontinued | Current |
| Engine & Drivetrain | ||
| Engine Type | Inline-3 | Inline-3 |
| Displacement | 1193cc | 796cc |
| Valvetrain | DOHC 12-valve | SOHC 12-valve |
| Compression Ratio | 10.5 : 1 | — |
| Aspiration | Naturally Aspirated | Naturally Aspirated |
| Fuel Type | Gas | Gas |
| Max Power | 78 PS @ 6000 rpm | 48 PS @ 6200 rpm |
| Max Torque | 100 Nm @ 4000 rpm | 68 Nm @ 3500 rpm |
| Transmission | 5-Speed M/T | 5-Speed M/T |
| Drivetrain | FWD | FWD |
| Body & Dimensions | ||
| Body Type | Hatchback | Hatchback |
| Segment | B | A |
| Construction | Unibody | Unibody |
| Doors | 5 | 5 |
| Seating Capacity | 2+3 | 2+3 |
| Length (mm) | 3710 | 3395 |
| Width (mm) | 1665 | 1490 |
| Height (mm) | 1500 | 1475 |
| Wheelbase (mm) | 2450 | 2360 |
| Curb Weight (kg) | 825 | 725 |
| Fuel Tank (L) | — | 35 |
| Chassis, Wheels & Brakes | ||
| Front Suspension | MacPherson | MacPherson |
| Rear Suspension | Torsion Beam | Multi-link Rigid Axle |
| Front Wheels | 14x5.0" Steel | 13 |
| Rear Wheels | 14x5.0" Steel | 13 |
| Front Tires | 165/65 R14 | 145/70 R13 |
| Rear Tires | 165/65 R14 | 145/70 R13 |
| Front Brakes | Disc | Disc |
| Rear Brakes | Drum | Drum |
| Steering Type | hydraulic | — |
| Steering Column | tilt | tilt |
| Tire Pressure Monitoring | No | No |
| Differential Lock | No | No |
| Safety | ||
| Anti-lock Braking (ABS) | No | No |
| Electronic Brakeforce Distribution | No | No |
| Brake Assist | No | No |
| Parking Sensors | No | No |
| Stability Control | No | No |
| Traction Control | No | No |
| Vehicle Dynamic Control | No | No |
| Forward Collision Mitigation | No | No |
| Blind Spot Warning | No | No |
| Hill Start Assist | No | No |
| Hill Descent Control | No | No |
| Auto Stop/Start | No | No |
| Driver Airbag | Yes | No |
| Knee Airbag | No | No |
| Passenger Airbag | Yes | No |
| Front Curtain Airbags | No | No |
| Rear Curtain Airbags | No | No |
| Rear Side Airbags | No | No |
| Engine Immobilizer | No | No |
| Security Alarm | No | No |
| Door Locking | standard | Standard |
| Comfort & Convenience | ||
| Air Conditioning | Manual Aircon | Manual Aircon |
| Rear A/C Vents | No | Yes |
| Seat Material | Fabric | Fabric |
| Parking Brake | Manual | Manual |
| Key Type | Standard Key | Standard Key |
| Push-Button Start | No | No |
| Cruise Control | No | No |
| Multi-Info Display | Yes | No |
| Paddle Shifters | No | No |
| Reverse Camera | No | No |
| Auto Headlights | No | No |
| Power Windows | Yes | No |
| Power Seats | No | No |
| Remote Trunk Release | No | No |
| Eco Mode | No | No |
| Antenna | yes | yes |
| Infotainment & Audio | ||
| Touchscreen | No | No |
| Navigation | No | No |
| Bluetooth | No | No |
| Apple CarPlay | No | No |
| Android Auto | No | No |
| USB | No | Yes |
| AUX Input | Yes | Yes |
| AM/FM Radio | Yes | Yes |
| CD Player | Yes | Yes |
| DVD Player | No | No |
| MP3 Playback | Yes | Yes |
| iPod Support | No | No |
| SD Card Slot | No | No |
| Speakers | — | 2 |
| Lighting | ||
| Headlights | Halogen | Halogen |
| Fog Lights | No | Yes |
| Daytime Running Lights | No | No |
Mitsubishi Mirage 1.2 GLX MT (2015) vs Suzuki Alto 800 0.8 Standard MT (2015): which should you buy?
For most Filipino daily commuters, the Suzuki Alto 800 0.8 offers better value thanks to its lower price of ₱445,000 versus ₱533,000, plus 20% more torque (68 Nm vs 50 Nm) and 20% more power (48 PS vs 39 PS). The Mirage is only available through discontinued channels, so the Alto is currently accessible. Both models share a 5-speed manual transmission, front-wheel-drive layout, 5-door hatchback design, and unibody construction, making practicality similar. The Mirage’s 78 PS and 100 Nm advantage is marginal against the Alto’s 68 Nm and 48 PS, so the choice depends more on budget and immediate availability. Given the Alto’s lower cost and identical warranty terms (100,000 km/3 years), it’s the clearer recommendation for buyers prioritizing affordability and current access.