Nissan Navara 2.5L 4×2 EL 7AT Calibre (2015) vs Suzuki Grand Vitara 2.4 Standard AT (2015)
A full spec-by-spec comparison of Nissan Navara 2.5L 4×2 EL 7AT Calibre (2015) vs Suzuki Grand Vitara 2.4 Standard AT (2015) — engine, performance, dimensions, features and price, with the differences highlighted to help you decide.
| Specification | Nissan Navara 2.5L 4×2 EL 7AT Calibre (2015) Nissan ₱1,171,000 | Suzuki Grand Vitara 2.4 Standard AT (2015) Suzuki ₱1,160,000 |
|---|---|---|
| Overview | ||
| Model Year | 2015 | 2015 |
| Warranty | 100,000km/3-years | 100,000km/3-years |
| Availability | Discontinued | Not available |
| Engine & Drivetrain | ||
| Engine Type | Inline-4 | Inline-4 |
| Displacement | 2488cc | 2394cc |
| Valvetrain | DOHC 16-valve | DOHC 16-valve |
| Compression Ratio | 15.0:1 | — |
| Aspiration | Turbo Intercooled VGT DI | Naturally Aspirated |
| Fuel Type | Diesel | Gas |
| Max Power | 163 PS @ 3600 rpm | 168 PS @ 6000 rpm |
| Max Torque | 403 Nm @ 2000 rpm | 227 Nm @ 4000 rpm |
| Transmission | 7-Speed A/T w/ Manual Mode | 4-Speed A/T |
| Drivetrain | RWD | RWD |
| Body & Dimensions | ||
| Body Type | Pickup | SUV |
| Segment | Pickup | J |
| Construction | Body-on-frame | Body-on-frame |
| Doors | 4 | 5 |
| Seating Capacity | 2+3 | 2+3 |
| Length (mm) | 5255 | 4500 |
| Width (mm) | 1850 | 1810 |
| Height (mm) | 1795 | 1683 |
| Wheelbase (mm) | 3150 | 2640 |
| Curb Weight (kg) | 1831 | 1580 |
| Fuel Tank (L) | 80 | 66 |
| Chassis, Wheels & Brakes | ||
| Front Suspension | Independent Double-Wishbone with Coil Spring and Stabilizer Bar | MacPherson Strut Coil Spring |
| Rear Suspension | Rigid 5-Link with Stabilizer Bar | Multi-Link |
| Front Wheels | 16 | 17" Alloys |
| Rear Wheels | 16 | 17" Alloys |
| Front Tires | 255/70R16 | 225/65 R17 |
| Rear Tires | 255/70R16 | 225/65 R17 |
| Rear Brakes | Drum | Drum |
| Steering Type | Power Steering | — |
| Steering Column | Manual Tilt | tilt |
| Tire Pressure Monitoring | No | No |
| Differential Lock | No | No |
| Front Brakes | — | Disc |
| Safety | ||
| Anti-lock Braking (ABS) | No | Yes |
| Electronic Brakeforce Distribution | Yes | Yes |
| Brake Assist | Yes | Yes |
| Parking Sensors | No | No |
| Stability Control | No | No |
| Traction Control | No | No |
| Vehicle Dynamic Control | No | No |
| Forward Collision Mitigation | No | No |
| Blind Spot Warning | No | No |
| Hill Start Assist | No | No |
| Hill Descent Control | No | No |
| Auto Stop/Start | No | No |
| Driver Airbag | Yes | Yes |
| Knee Airbag | No | No |
| Passenger Airbag | Yes | Yes |
| Front Curtain Airbags | No | No |
| Rear Curtain Airbags | No | No |
| Rear Side Airbags | No | No |
| Engine Immobilizer | Yes | No |
| Security Alarm | Yes | Yes |
| Door Locking | Central Locking | Central Locking |
| Comfort & Convenience | ||
| Air Conditioning | Manual, Push Type | Automatic Climate Control |
| Rear A/C Vents | Yes | No |
| Seat Material | Zero-Gravity Seats, Fabric | Fabric |
| Parking Brake | Manual | Manual |
| Key Type | Manual | Keyless Entry |
| Push-Button Start | No | No |
| Cruise Control | No | No |
| Multi-Info Display | No | Yes |
| Paddle Shifters | No | No |
| Reverse Camera | No | No |
| Auto Headlights | No | No |
| Power Windows | Yes | Yes |
| Power Seats | No | No |
| Remote Trunk Release | No | No |
| Eco Mode | No | No |
| Antenna | yes | yes |
| Infotainment & Audio | ||
| Speakers | 6 | 4 |
| Touchscreen | No | No |
| Navigation | No | No |
| Bluetooth | No | No |
| Apple CarPlay | No | No |
| Android Auto | No | No |
| USB | Yes | Yes |
| AUX Input | Yes | Yes |
| AM/FM Radio | Yes | Yes |
| CD Player | Yes | Yes |
| DVD Player | No | No |
| MP3 Playback | Yes | Yes |
| iPod Support | Yes | No |
| SD Card Slot | No | No |
| Lighting | ||
| Headlights | Halogen | Halogen |
| Fog Lights | Yes | Yes |
| Daytime Running Lights | No | No |
Nissan Navara 2.5L 4×2 EL 7AT Calibre (2015) vs Suzuki Grand Vitara 2.4 Standard AT (2015): which should you buy?
For a Filipino buyer comparing a 2015 Nissan Navara 2.5L 4x2 EL 7AT Calibre (₱1,171,000) with a 2015 Suzuki Grand Vitara 2.4 Standard AT (₱1,160,000), the choice boils down to your primary need. The Navara is a diesel pickup with a turbocharged 2.5L engine producing 163 PS and a massive 403 Nm of torque, mated to a modern 7-speed automatic transmission. This makes it far superior for towing, hauling heavy loads, or off-road work thanks to its high torque at low rpm. It also offers better fuel economy typical of diesels. However, it’s a body-on-frame pickup with a leaf-sprung rear, so ride comfort on rough roads is compromised. The Grand Vitara is a gas-powered SUV with a naturally aspirated 2.4L engine making 168 PS but only 227 Nm, paired with an outdated 4-speed automatic. It’s lighter on torque but may feel more responsive in daily driving due to higher horsepower. The SUV body provides enclosed, secure storage and a more car-like cabin. But its fuel economy is poorer, and its off-road capability is limited by the lower torque and gas engine. Both are discontinued and from 2015, so consider newer alternatives. Verdict: Choose the Navara if you need a tough workhorse with excellent pulling power and diesel efficiency. Choose the Grand Vitara if you prioritize passenger comfort and enclosed cargo, and can accept higher fuel costs.
Frequently asked questions
Which is cheaper between the Nissan Navara and Suzuki Grand Vitara (2015 models)?
The Suzuki Grand Vitara 2.4 Standard AT (2015) is slightly cheaper at ₱1,160,000 compared to the Nissan Navara 2.5L 4×2 EL 7AT Calibre (2015) at ₱1,171,000, a difference of only ₱11,000.
Which vehicle has more power and torque for towing or hauling?
The Nissan Navara produces 403 Nm of torque at 2000 rpm, which is significantly higher than the Grand Vitara's 227 Nm at 4000 rpm. For towing and hauling heavy loads, the Navara's diesel engine and higher torque make it much more suitable.
Which is better for daily commuting in the city?
For daily commuting, the Suzuki Grand Vitara may be better due to its SUV body and smoother ride, but it has a lower fuel economy (gas engine) and only a 4-speed automatic. The Navara's diesel engine offers better fuel efficiency for long commutes, but its pickup bed and stiffer ride may be less comfortable for urban driving.
Which vehicle is more fuel-efficient?
Based on engine type, the Nissan Navara's diesel engine is generally more fuel-efficient than the Grand Vitara's gasoline engine, especially for highway driving and heavy loads. However, specific fuel consumption figures are not provided in the data.