Nissan NV350 Urvan 15-seater (2015) vs Ford Ranger Wildtrak 2.2L 4×2 MT (2017)
A full spec-by-spec comparison of Nissan NV350 Urvan 15-seater (2015) vs Ford Ranger Wildtrak 2.2L 4×2 MT (2017) — engine, performance, dimensions, features and price, with the differences highlighted to help you decide.
| Specification | Nissan NV350 Urvan 15-seater (2015) Nissan ₱1,436,000 | Ford Ranger Wildtrak 2.2L 4×2 MT (2017) Ford ₱1,328,000 |
|---|---|---|
| Overview | ||
| Model Year | 2015 | 2017 |
| Warranty | 100,000km/3-years | 100,000km/3-years |
| Availability | Discontinued | Current |
| Engine & Drivetrain | ||
| Engine Type | Inline-4 | Inline-4 |
| Displacement | 2488cc | 2198cc |
| Valvetrain | DOHC 16-valve | DOHC 16-valve |
| Aspiration | Variable Turbocharger (VGS) | Turbocharged |
| Fuel Type | Diesel | Diesel |
| Max Power | 129 PS @ 3200 rpm | 160 PS @ 3200 rpm |
| Max Torque | 356 Nm @ 1400-2000 rpm | 385 Nm @ 1600-2500 rpm |
| Transmission | 5-Speed M/T (Dash-Mounted) | 6-Speed M/T |
| Drivetrain | — | RWD |
| Body & Dimensions | ||
| Body Type | Van | Pick Up |
| Segment | M | Pick-Up |
| Doors | 4 | 4 |
| Seating Capacity | 15 | 2+3 |
| Length (mm) | 4695 | 5277 |
| Width (mm) | 1695 | 2163 |
| Height (mm) | 1990 | 1821 |
| Wheelbase (mm) | 2555 | 3220 |
| Curb Weight (kg) | 1825 | — |
| Fuel Tank (L) | 65 | 80 |
| Chassis, Wheels & Brakes | ||
| Front Suspension | Torsion Bar with Front Stabilizer | Double Wishbone with Coil Spring |
| Rear Suspension | Leaf Spring | Leaf Spring |
| Front Wheels | 15 | 18 |
| Rear Wheels | 15 | 18 |
| Front Tires | 195/80R15LT | 265/60 R18 |
| Rear Tires | 195/80R15LT | 265/60 R18 |
| Rear Brakes | Drum | Drum |
| Steering Type | Power Steering | EPS |
| Steering Column | Manual Tilt | — |
| Tire Pressure Monitoring | No | No |
| Differential Lock | No | No |
| Front Brakes | — | Disc |
| Safety | ||
| Anti-lock Braking (ABS) | No | Yes |
| Electronic Brakeforce Distribution | No | Yes |
| Brake Assist | No | Yes |
| Parking Sensors | No | Yes |
| Stability Control | No | Yes |
| Traction Control | No | Yes |
| Vehicle Dynamic Control | No | No |
| Forward Collision Mitigation | No | No |
| Blind Spot Warning | No | No |
| Hill Start Assist | No | Yes |
| Hill Descent Control | No | Yes |
| Auto Stop/Start | No | No |
| Driver Airbag | Yes | Yes |
| Knee Airbag | No | Yes |
| Passenger Airbag | No | Yes |
| Front Curtain Airbags | No | Yes |
| Rear Curtain Airbags | No | Yes |
| Rear Side Airbags | No | Yes |
| Engine Immobilizer | No | No |
| Security Alarm | No | Yes |
| Door Locking | Standard | Central Locking |
| Comfort & Convenience | ||
| Air Conditioning | Manual, Dial Type | Dual-zone EATC |
| Rear A/C Vents | Yes | Yes |
| Seat Material | Fabric | Leather |
| Parking Brake | Manual | Manual |
| Key Type | Manual | Keyless Entry |
| Push-Button Start | No | No |
| Cruise Control | No | Yes |
| Multi-Info Display | No | Yes |
| Paddle Shifters | No | No |
| Reverse Camera | No | Yes |
| Auto Headlights | No | Yes |
| Power Windows | Yes | Yes |
| Power Seats | No | Yes |
| Remote Trunk Release | No | No |
| Eco Mode | No | No |
| Antenna | yes | yes |
| Infotainment & Audio | ||
| Speakers | 2 | 6 |
| Touchscreen | No | Yes |
| Navigation | No | No |
| Bluetooth | No | Yes |
| Apple CarPlay | No | No |
| Android Auto | No | No |
| USB | No | Yes |
| AUX Input | No | Yes |
| AM/FM Radio | No | Yes |
| CD Player | No | Yes |
| DVD Player | No | No |
| MP3 Playback | No | Yes |
| iPod Support | No | Yes |
| SD Card Slot | No | No |
| Lighting | ||
| Headlights | Halogen | HID |
| Fog Lights | Yes | Yes |
| Daytime Running Lights | No | No |
Nissan NV350 Urvan 15-seater (2015) vs Ford Ranger Wildtrak 2.2L 4×2 MT (2017): which should you buy?
For a Filipino buyer focused on passenger transport, the Nissan NV350 Urvan 15‑seater offers far greater seating capacity (15 seats vs. 2+3 in the Ranger) and a van body that can accommodate groups or a small business shuttle. It is priced at ₱1,436,000, about ₱108,000 more than the 2017 Ford Ranger Wildtrak, but the extra cost buys space, a longer wheelbase (4695 mm vs. 5277 mm length but narrower width) and a diesel engine tuned for low‑end torque (356 Nm @ 1400‑2000 rpm) suitable for city hauling. The Ranger, priced at ₱1,328,000, delivers higher power (160 PS vs. 129 PS) and slightly more torque (385 Nm) with a broader torque band, plus a 6‑speed manual and a more modern 2017 model year. It is a pickup, better for cargo and occasional passenger trips, and its current availability means easier service and parts. Both share the same 100,000 km/3‑year warranty. Choose the Nissan if you need regular transport for many passengers and value interior volume; choose the Ford if you prefer a newer, more powerful truck for mixed cargo‑passenger use and want a lower purchase price.
Frequently asked questions
Which vehicle is cheaper?
The Ford Ranger Wildtrak 2.2L 4×2 MT (2017) costs ₱1,328,000, which is ₱108,000 less than the Nissan NV350 Urvan 15‑seater priced at ₱1,436,000.
Which model has more power?
The Ford Ranger Wildtrak produces 160 PS, while the Nissan NV350 Urvan produces 129 PS, making the Ranger the more powerful unit.
Which vehicle offers more seating?
The Nissan NV350 Urvan provides a 15‑seat capacity, far exceeding the Ranger’s 2+3 seating arrangement.
Is the Nissan still available?
The Nissan NV350 Urvan is listed as discontinued, meaning new units are no longer being produced, whereas the Ford Ranger is a current model.