Nissan NV350 Urvan Cargo (2015) vs Suzuki Grand Vitara 2.4 Special Edition AT (2015)
A full spec-by-spec comparison of Nissan NV350 Urvan Cargo (2015) vs Suzuki Grand Vitara 2.4 Special Edition AT (2015) — engine, performance, dimensions, features and price, with the differences highlighted to help you decide.
| Specification | Nissan NV350 Urvan Cargo (2015) Nissan ₱1,158,000 | Suzuki Grand Vitara 2.4 Special Edition AT (2015) Suzuki ₱1,210,000 |
|---|---|---|
| Overview | ||
| Model Year | 2015 | 2015 |
| Warranty | 100,000km/3-years | 100,000km/3-years |
| Availability | Discontinued | Not available |
| Engine & Drivetrain | ||
| Engine Type | Inline-4 | Inline-4 |
| Displacement | 2488cc | 2394cc |
| Valvetrain | DOHC 16-valve | DOHC 16-valve |
| Aspiration | Variable Turbocharger (VGS) | Naturally Aspirated |
| Fuel Type | Diesel | Gas |
| Max Power | 129 PS @ 3200 rpm | 168 PS @ 6000 rpm |
| Max Torque | 356 Nm @ 1400-2000 rpm | 227 Nm @ 3800 rpm |
| Transmission | 5-Speed M/T (Dash-Mounted) | 4-Speed A/T |
| Drivetrain | — | RWD |
| Body & Dimensions | ||
| Body Type | Van | SUV |
| Segment | M | J |
| Doors | 4 | 5 |
| Seating Capacity | 3 | 2+3 |
| Length (mm) | 5080 | 4500 |
| Width (mm) | 1695 | 1810 |
| Height (mm) | 2285 | 1683 |
| Wheelbase (mm) | 2940 | 2640 |
| Curb Weight (kg) | 1825 | 1580 |
| Fuel Tank (L) | 65 | 66 |
| Construction | — | Body-on-frame |
| Chassis, Wheels & Brakes | ||
| Front Suspension | Torsion Bar with Front Stabilizer | MacPherson Strut Coil Spring |
| Rear Suspension | Leaf Spring | Multi-Link |
| Front Wheels | 15 | 18" Alloys |
| Rear Wheels | 15 | 18" Alloys |
| Front Tires | 195/80R15LT | 225/60 R18 |
| Rear Tires | 195/80R15LT | 225/60 R18 |
| Rear Brakes | Drum | Disc |
| Steering Type | Power Steering | — |
| Steering Column | Manual Tilt | tilt |
| Tire Pressure Monitoring | No | No |
| Differential Lock | No | No |
| Front Brakes | — | Disc |
| Safety | ||
| Anti-lock Braking (ABS) | No | Yes |
| Electronic Brakeforce Distribution | No | Yes |
| Brake Assist | No | Yes |
| Parking Sensors | No | No |
| Stability Control | No | No |
| Traction Control | No | No |
| Vehicle Dynamic Control | No | No |
| Forward Collision Mitigation | No | No |
| Blind Spot Warning | No | No |
| Hill Start Assist | No | No |
| Hill Descent Control | No | No |
| Auto Stop/Start | No | No |
| Driver Airbag | Yes | Yes |
| Knee Airbag | No | No |
| Passenger Airbag | No | Yes |
| Front Curtain Airbags | No | No |
| Rear Curtain Airbags | No | No |
| Rear Side Airbags | No | No |
| Engine Immobilizer | No | No |
| Security Alarm | No | Yes |
| Door Locking | Standard | Central Locking |
| Comfort & Convenience | ||
| Air Conditioning | Manual, Dial Type | Automatic Climate Control |
| Rear A/C Vents | Yes | No |
| Seat Material | Fabric | Leather |
| Parking Brake | Manual | Manual |
| Key Type | Manual | Keyless Entry |
| Push-Button Start | No | No |
| Cruise Control | No | No |
| Multi-Info Display | No | Yes |
| Paddle Shifters | No | No |
| Reverse Camera | No | No |
| Auto Headlights | No | No |
| Power Windows | Yes | Yes |
| Power Seats | No | No |
| Remote Trunk Release | No | No |
| Eco Mode | No | No |
| Antenna | yes | yes |
| Infotainment & Audio | ||
| Speakers | 2 | 4 |
| Touchscreen | No | No |
| Navigation | No | No |
| Bluetooth | No | No |
| Apple CarPlay | No | No |
| Android Auto | No | No |
| USB | No | Yes |
| AUX Input | No | Yes |
| AM/FM Radio | No | Yes |
| CD Player | No | Yes |
| DVD Player | No | No |
| MP3 Playback | No | Yes |
| iPod Support | No | No |
| SD Card Slot | No | No |
| Lighting | ||
| Headlights | Halogen | Halogen |
| Fog Lights | Yes | Yes |
| Daytime Running Lights | No | No |
Nissan NV350 Urvan Cargo (2015) vs Suzuki Grand Vitara 2.4 Special Edition AT (2015): which should you buy?
For a Filipino buyer weighing a work‑horse van against a compact SUV, the choice hinges on purpose, payload and power. The 2015 Nissan NV350 Urvan Cargo costs ₱1,158,000, about ₱52,000 less than the Suzuki Grand Vitara Special Edition AT, and it offers a diesel engine with 129 PS and a massive 356 Nm of torque at low revs (1400‑2000 rpm). That low‑end torque makes the Urvan far better for hauling heavy loads, especially in city traffic or on uneven provincial roads. Its 5‑speed manual transmission and three‑seat layout maximize cargo volume within a 5.08 m length, 1.70 m width and 2.29 m height, making it ideal for small‑business owners, transport operators, or families needing a dedicated cargo carrier. The Grand Vitara, priced at ₱1,210,000, is a gasoline‑powered SUV with 168 PS and 227 Nm, delivering higher peak power but considerably less torque, which translates to a sportier drive rather than load‑carrying capability. It seats up to five, has a shorter 4.5 m length and a body‑on‑frame RWD layout, suited for personal use, weekend trips, or light off‑road duty. However, it is not currently available in the market. In summary, choose the Nissan Urvan if you need a practical, lower‑cost, high‑torque van for cargo or passenger conversion; opt for the Suzuki Vitara only if you prioritize higher power, SUV styling and can wait for availability, accepting a higher price and lower load capacity.
Frequently asked questions
Which vehicle is cheaper?
The Nissan NV350 Urvan Cargo is priced at ₱1,158,000, which is ₱52,000 less than the Suzuki Grand Vitara’s ₱1,210,000 price.
Which model has more torque?
The Urvan’s diesel engine produces 356 Nm of torque at 1400‑2000 rpm, far exceeding the Vitara’s 227 Nm at 3800 rpm.
Is the Grand Vitara available for purchase?
According to the data, the Suzuki Grand Vitara 2.4 Special Edition AT is listed as "Not available".
Which vehicle is better suited for cargo or commercial use?
The Nissan NV350 Urvan Cargo, with its larger dimensions, three‑seat layout, diesel engine and higher low‑end torque, is designed for cargo and commercial applications, whereas the Vitara is an SUV aimed at personal use.