Nissan NV350 Urvan Cargo (2015) vs Suzuki Grand Vitara 2.4 Standard AT (2015)
A full spec-by-spec comparison of Nissan NV350 Urvan Cargo (2015) vs Suzuki Grand Vitara 2.4 Standard AT (2015) — engine, performance, dimensions, features and price, with the differences highlighted to help you decide.
| Specification | Nissan NV350 Urvan Cargo (2015) Nissan ₱1,158,000 | Suzuki Grand Vitara 2.4 Standard AT (2015) Suzuki ₱1,160,000 |
|---|---|---|
| Overview | ||
| Model Year | 2015 | 2015 |
| Warranty | 100,000km/3-years | 100,000km/3-years |
| Availability | Discontinued | Not available |
| Engine & Drivetrain | ||
| Engine Type | Inline-4 | Inline-4 |
| Displacement | 2488cc | 2394cc |
| Valvetrain | DOHC 16-valve | DOHC 16-valve |
| Aspiration | Variable Turbocharger (VGS) | Naturally Aspirated |
| Fuel Type | Diesel | Gas |
| Max Power | 129 PS @ 3200 rpm | 168 PS @ 6000 rpm |
| Max Torque | 356 Nm @ 1400-2000 rpm | 227 Nm @ 4000 rpm |
| Transmission | 5-Speed M/T (Dash-Mounted) | 4-Speed A/T |
| Drivetrain | — | RWD |
| Body & Dimensions | ||
| Body Type | Van | SUV |
| Segment | M | J |
| Doors | 4 | 5 |
| Seating Capacity | 3 | 2+3 |
| Length (mm) | 5080 | 4500 |
| Width (mm) | 1695 | 1810 |
| Height (mm) | 2285 | 1683 |
| Wheelbase (mm) | 2940 | 2640 |
| Curb Weight (kg) | 1825 | 1580 |
| Fuel Tank (L) | 65 | 66 |
| Construction | — | Body-on-frame |
| Chassis, Wheels & Brakes | ||
| Front Suspension | Torsion Bar with Front Stabilizer | MacPherson Strut Coil Spring |
| Rear Suspension | Leaf Spring | Multi-Link |
| Front Wheels | 15 | 17" Alloys |
| Rear Wheels | 15 | 17" Alloys |
| Front Tires | 195/80R15LT | 225/65 R17 |
| Rear Tires | 195/80R15LT | 225/65 R17 |
| Rear Brakes | Drum | Drum |
| Steering Type | Power Steering | — |
| Steering Column | Manual Tilt | tilt |
| Tire Pressure Monitoring | No | No |
| Differential Lock | No | No |
| Front Brakes | — | Disc |
| Safety | ||
| Anti-lock Braking (ABS) | No | Yes |
| Electronic Brakeforce Distribution | No | Yes |
| Brake Assist | No | Yes |
| Parking Sensors | No | No |
| Stability Control | No | No |
| Traction Control | No | No |
| Vehicle Dynamic Control | No | No |
| Forward Collision Mitigation | No | No |
| Blind Spot Warning | No | No |
| Hill Start Assist | No | No |
| Hill Descent Control | No | No |
| Auto Stop/Start | No | No |
| Driver Airbag | Yes | Yes |
| Knee Airbag | No | No |
| Passenger Airbag | No | Yes |
| Front Curtain Airbags | No | No |
| Rear Curtain Airbags | No | No |
| Rear Side Airbags | No | No |
| Engine Immobilizer | No | No |
| Security Alarm | No | Yes |
| Door Locking | Standard | Central Locking |
| Comfort & Convenience | ||
| Air Conditioning | Manual, Dial Type | Automatic Climate Control |
| Rear A/C Vents | Yes | No |
| Seat Material | Fabric | Fabric |
| Parking Brake | Manual | Manual |
| Key Type | Manual | Keyless Entry |
| Push-Button Start | No | No |
| Cruise Control | No | No |
| Multi-Info Display | No | Yes |
| Paddle Shifters | No | No |
| Reverse Camera | No | No |
| Auto Headlights | No | No |
| Power Windows | Yes | Yes |
| Power Seats | No | No |
| Remote Trunk Release | No | No |
| Eco Mode | No | No |
| Antenna | yes | yes |
| Infotainment & Audio | ||
| Speakers | 2 | 4 |
| Touchscreen | No | No |
| Navigation | No | No |
| Bluetooth | No | No |
| Apple CarPlay | No | No |
| Android Auto | No | No |
| USB | No | Yes |
| AUX Input | No | Yes |
| AM/FM Radio | No | Yes |
| CD Player | No | Yes |
| DVD Player | No | No |
| MP3 Playback | No | Yes |
| iPod Support | No | No |
| SD Card Slot | No | No |
| Lighting | ||
| Headlights | Halogen | Halogen |
| Fog Lights | Yes | Yes |
| Daytime Running Lights | No | No |
Nissan NV350 Urvan Cargo (2015) vs Suzuki Grand Vitara 2.4 Standard AT (2015): which should you buy?
For a Filipino buyer weighing practicality against performance, the 2015 Nissan NV350 Urvan Cargo stands out as the more versatile choice. Priced at ₱1,158,000—slightly cheaper than the Suzuki Grand Vitara’s ₱1,160,000—the Urvan offers a diesel engine with 129 PS and 356 Nm torque, delivering robust low‑end power ideal for hauling goods. Its van body type and 4‑door layout accommodate up to three occupants, making it suitable for small families or commercial use. The 5‑speed manual transmission gives drivers direct control, while the 100 000 km/3‑year warranty provides peace of mind. In contrast, the Grand Vitara’s gasoline 2.4‑liter engine produces 168 PS and 227 Nm, but its higher power is offset by a smaller torque range (4000 rpm) and a 4‑speed automatic that may feel sluggish under load. The SUV’s body‑on‑frame construction and RWD drivetrain cater to off‑road or rugged terrain, yet its 5‑door layout only seats five (2+3) and the vehicle is no longer available, limiting future support. Thus, if you need a cost‑effective, torque‑heavy van for cargo or family use, the Urvan is preferable; if you prioritize a sporty SUV with higher peak power and off‑road capability, the Vitara would be better—though its discontinuation may affect maintenance.
Frequently asked questions
Which vehicle is cheaper?
The Nissan NV350 Urvan Cargo costs ₱1,158,000, while the Suzuki Grand Vitara 2.4 Standard AT is priced at ₱1,160,000.
Which has more power?
The Grand Vitara’s gasoline engine produces 168 PS at 6000 rpm, higher than the Urvan’s diesel engine which delivers 129 PS at 3200 rpm.
Which offers better torque for hauling?
The Urvan’s diesel engine provides 356 Nm between 1400–2000 rpm, significantly higher than the Vitara’s 227 Nm at 4000 rpm.
Which is more practical for daily commuting?
The Urvan’s van body, 4 doors, and seating for three make it more practical for cargo or small family use; the Vitara’s SUV body and 5‑door layout suit passenger transport but offer less cargo space.