Nissan NV350 Urvan Cargo (2015) vs Toyota Avanza Veloz (2015)
A full spec-by-spec comparison of Nissan NV350 Urvan Cargo (2015) vs Toyota Avanza Veloz (2015) — engine, performance, dimensions, features and price, with the differences highlighted to help you decide.
| Specification | Nissan NV350 Urvan Cargo (2015) Nissan ₱1,158,000 | Toyota Avanza Veloz (2015) Toyota ₱1,065,000 |
|---|---|---|
| Overview | ||
| Model Year | 2015 | 2015 |
| Warranty | 100,000km/3-years | 100,000 km/3-years |
| Availability | Discontinued | Current |
| Engine & Drivetrain | ||
| Engine Type | Inline-4 | Inline-4 |
| Displacement | 2488cc | 1596cc |
| Valvetrain | DOHC 16-valve | DOHC 16-valve |
| Aspiration | Variable Turbocharger (VGS) | Naturally Aspirated VVT-i |
| Fuel Type | Diesel | Gas |
| Max Power | 129 PS @ 3200 rpm | 102 PS @ 6000 rpm |
| Max Torque | 356 Nm @ 1400-2000 rpm | 136 Nm @ 4400 rpm |
| Transmission | 5-Speed M/T (Dash-Mounted) | 4-Speed A/T |
| Drivetrain | — | FWD |
| Body & Dimensions | ||
| Body Type | Van | MPV |
| Segment | M | M |
| Doors | 4 | 5 |
| Seating Capacity | 3 | 2+3+2 |
| Length (mm) | 5080 | 4190 |
| Width (mm) | 1695 | 1660 |
| Height (mm) | 2285 | 1695 |
| Wheelbase (mm) | 2940 | 2655 |
| Curb Weight (kg) | 1825 | 1100 |
| Fuel Tank (L) | 65 | 45 |
| Construction | — | Unibody |
| Chassis, Wheels & Brakes | ||
| Front Suspension | Torsion Bar with Front Stabilizer | MacPherson w/ Coil Spring |
| Rear Suspension | Leaf Spring | 4-Link |
| Front Wheels | 15 | 15 Alloy |
| Rear Wheels | 15 | 15 Alloy |
| Front Tires | 195/80R15LT | 185/65 R15 |
| Rear Tires | 195/80R15LT | 185/65 R15 |
| Rear Brakes | Drum | Drum |
| Steering Type | Power Steering | EPS |
| Steering Column | Manual Tilt | Tilt |
| Tire Pressure Monitoring | No | No |
| Differential Lock | No | No |
| Front Brakes | — | Disc |
| Steering Ratio | — | 4.7 |
| Safety | ||
| Anti-lock Braking (ABS) | No | Yes |
| Electronic Brakeforce Distribution | No | Yes |
| Brake Assist | No | No |
| Parking Sensors | No | No |
| Stability Control | No | No |
| Traction Control | No | No |
| Vehicle Dynamic Control | No | No |
| Forward Collision Mitigation | No | No |
| Blind Spot Warning | No | No |
| Hill Start Assist | No | No |
| Hill Descent Control | No | No |
| Auto Stop/Start | No | No |
| Driver Airbag | Yes | Yes |
| Knee Airbag | No | No |
| Passenger Airbag | No | Yes |
| Front Curtain Airbags | No | No |
| Rear Curtain Airbags | No | No |
| Rear Side Airbags | No | No |
| Engine Immobilizer | No | No |
| Security Alarm | No | Yes |
| Door Locking | Standard | Central Locking |
| Comfort & Convenience | ||
| Air Conditioning | Manual, Dial Type | Manual Aircon |
| Rear A/C Vents | Yes | Yes |
| Seat Material | Fabric | Fabric |
| Parking Brake | Manual | Manual |
| Key Type | Manual | Keyless Entry & Alarm |
| Push-Button Start | No | No |
| Cruise Control | No | No |
| Multi-Info Display | No | Yes |
| Paddle Shifters | No | No |
| Reverse Camera | No | No |
| Auto Headlights | No | No |
| Power Windows | Yes | Yes |
| Power Seats | No | No |
| Remote Trunk Release | No | No |
| Eco Mode | No | No |
| Antenna | yes | yes |
| Infotainment & Audio | ||
| Speakers | 2 | 4 |
| Touchscreen | No | Yes |
| Navigation | No | Yes |
| Bluetooth | No | Yes |
| Apple CarPlay | No | No |
| Android Auto | No | No |
| USB | No | Yes |
| AUX Input | No | Yes |
| AM/FM Radio | No | Yes |
| CD Player | No | Yes |
| DVD Player | No | No |
| MP3 Playback | No | Yes |
| iPod Support | No | Yes |
| SD Card Slot | No | No |
| Lighting | ||
| Headlights | Halogen | Halogen |
| Fog Lights | Yes | Yes |
| Daytime Running Lights | No | No |
Nissan NV350 Urvan Cargo (2015) vs Toyota Avanza Veloz (2015): which should you buy?
The Nissan NV350 Urvan Cargo (₱1,158,000) is the better choice for Filipino buyers prioritizing cargo capacity and durability, while the Toyota Avanza Veloz (₱1,065,000) suits those needing passenger comfort and fuel efficiency. The NV350’s 4-door van design with 3 seats and 129 PS power makes it ideal for hauling goods, though its gas-powered counterpart costs less and offers a 5-door MPV with flexible seating. Both vehicles have 100,000 km/3-year warranties, but the NV350’s 5-speed manual transmission and larger dimensions (5080 mm length) support heavier loads, while the Avanza’s 4-speed automatic and FWD design prioritize daily usability. Availability is a key factor: the NV350 is discontinued, limiting sourcing options, whereas the Avanza remains current. For most buyers, the Avanza’s lower price and drivability outweigh the NV350’s utility, though the NV350 excels in work-focused scenarios.
Frequently asked questions
Which is cheaper?
The Toyota Avanza Veloz costs ₱1,065,000, while the Nissan NV350 Urvan Cargo is ₱1,158,000.
Which is more powerful?
The Nissan NV350 Urvan Cargo delivers 129 PS, compared to the Toyota Avanza Veloz’s 102 PS.
Which is better for daily commuting?
The Toyota Avanza Veloz’s 4-speed automatic transmission and FWD design make it more practical for daily commuting, while the NV350’s 5-speed manual and larger footprint are less suited for city driving.
What is the warranty period?
Both vehicles offer a 100,000 km/3-year warranty.