Nissan NV350 Urvan Cargo (2015) vs Toyota Hilux 2.4 G 4×2 MT (2015)
A full spec-by-spec comparison of Nissan NV350 Urvan Cargo (2015) vs Toyota Hilux 2.4 G 4×2 MT (2015) — engine, performance, dimensions, features and price, with the differences highlighted to help you decide.
| Specification | Nissan NV350 Urvan Cargo (2015) Nissan ₱1,158,000 | Toyota Hilux 2.4 G 4×2 MT (2015) Toyota ₱1,165,000 |
|---|---|---|
| Overview | ||
| Model Year | 2015 | 2015 |
| Warranty | 100,000km/3-years | 100,000km/3-years |
| Availability | Discontinued | Current |
| Engine & Drivetrain | ||
| Engine Type | Inline-4 | Inline-4 |
| Displacement | 2488cc | 2393cc |
| Valvetrain | DOHC 16-valve | DOHC 16-valve |
| Aspiration | Variable Turbocharger (VGS) | VN Turbo Intercooler CRDI |
| Fuel Type | Diesel | Diesel |
| Max Power | 129 PS @ 3200 rpm | 149 PS @ 3400 rpm |
| Max Torque | 356 Nm @ 1400-2000 rpm | 400 Nm @ 1600-2000 rpm |
| Transmission | 5-Speed M/T (Dash-Mounted) | 6-Speed M/T |
| Drivetrain | — | RWD |
| Body & Dimensions | ||
| Body Type | Van | Pickup |
| Segment | M | Pickup |
| Doors | 4 | 4 |
| Seating Capacity | 3 | 2+3 |
| Length (mm) | 5080 | 5285 |
| Width (mm) | 1695 | 1855 |
| Height (mm) | 2285 | 1815 |
| Wheelbase (mm) | 2940 | 3085 |
| Curb Weight (kg) | 1825 | 1740 |
| Fuel Tank (L) | 65 | 80 |
| Construction | — | Body-on-frame |
| Chassis, Wheels & Brakes | ||
| Front Suspension | Torsion Bar with Front Stabilizer | Double Wishbone |
| Rear Suspension | Leaf Spring | Rigid Axle, Leaf Springs |
| Front Wheels | 15 | 17x7.5 |
| Rear Wheels | 15 | 17x7.5 |
| Front Tires | 195/80R15LT | 265/65 R17 |
| Rear Tires | 195/80R15LT | 265/65 R17 |
| Rear Brakes | Drum | Drum |
| Steering Type | Power Steering | Power |
| Steering Column | Manual Tilt | Tilt & Telescopic |
| Tire Pressure Monitoring | No | No |
| Differential Lock | No | No |
| Front Brakes | — | Disc |
| Safety | ||
| Anti-lock Braking (ABS) | No | Yes |
| Electronic Brakeforce Distribution | No | Yes |
| Brake Assist | No | No |
| Parking Sensors | No | Yes |
| Stability Control | No | No |
| Traction Control | No | No |
| Vehicle Dynamic Control | No | No |
| Forward Collision Mitigation | No | No |
| Blind Spot Warning | No | No |
| Hill Start Assist | No | No |
| Hill Descent Control | No | No |
| Auto Stop/Start | No | No |
| Driver Airbag | Yes | Yes |
| Knee Airbag | No | Yes |
| Passenger Airbag | No | Yes |
| Front Curtain Airbags | No | No |
| Rear Curtain Airbags | No | No |
| Rear Side Airbags | No | No |
| Engine Immobilizer | No | Yes |
| Security Alarm | No | Yes |
| Door Locking | Standard | Central Locking |
| Comfort & Convenience | ||
| Air Conditioning | Manual, Dial Type | Manual Aircon |
| Rear A/C Vents | Yes | Yes |
| Seat Material | Fabric | Fabric |
| Parking Brake | Manual | Manual |
| Key Type | Manual | Keyless Entry |
| Push-Button Start | No | No |
| Cruise Control | No | No |
| Multi-Info Display | No | Yes |
| Paddle Shifters | No | No |
| Reverse Camera | No | No |
| Auto Headlights | No | No |
| Power Windows | Yes | Yes |
| Power Seats | No | No |
| Remote Trunk Release | No | No |
| Eco Mode | No | Yes |
| Antenna | yes | yes |
| Infotainment & Audio | ||
| Speakers | 2 | 6 |
| Touchscreen | No | Yes |
| Navigation | No | Yes |
| Bluetooth | No | Yes |
| Apple CarPlay | No | No |
| Android Auto | No | No |
| USB | No | Yes |
| AUX Input | No | Yes |
| AM/FM Radio | No | Yes |
| CD Player | No | Yes |
| DVD Player | No | No |
| MP3 Playback | No | Yes |
| iPod Support | No | Yes |
| SD Card Slot | No | No |
| Lighting | ||
| Headlights | Halogen | Halogen |
| Fog Lights | Yes | Yes |
| Daytime Running Lights | No | No |
Nissan NV350 Urvan Cargo (2015) vs Toyota Hilux 2.4 G 4×2 MT (2015): which should you buy?
For a Filipino buyer who needs a workhorse primarily for cargo transport, the 2015 Nissan NV350 Urvan Cargo is the more practical choice. It offers a spacious van body with a 5.08‑meter length and a high roof (2.285 m), allowing bulky loads and easy loading through its rear doors, while seating only three, which maximizes cargo volume. Its diesel 2.5‑L turbo engine delivers 129 PS and 356 Nm of torque, sufficient for city and inter‑city hauling, and it comes at a slightly lower price (₱1,158,000) than the Hilux. The Hilux 2.4 G, priced at ₱1,165,000, is a rugged pickup with a body‑on‑frame chassis, higher power (149 PS) and torque (400 Nm), and a 6‑speed manual, making it better suited for off‑road or mixed‑use where towing and passenger flexibility (2 + 3 seats) matter. However, its cargo bed is limited in length (overall vehicle length 5.285 m) and offers less vertical clearance than the Urvan. Both carry the same warranty and diesel fuel, but the Urvan is discontinued, meaning parts may be harder to source in the future. Choose the Nissan if maximum enclosed cargo space and lower upfront cost are priorities; opt for the Toyota Hilux if you need higher power, off‑road capability, and a versatile passenger‑plus‑bed configuration.
Frequently asked questions
Which vehicle is cheaper?
The Nissan NV350 Urvan Cargo is priced at ₱1,158,000, which is ₱7,000 less than the Toyota Hilux 2.4 G priced at ₱1,165,000.
Which model has more power and torque?
The Toyota Hilux 2.4 G produces 149 PS and 400 Nm of torque, while the Nissan Urvan Cargo delivers 129 PS and 356 Nm.
Which is better for carrying large cargo?
The Nissan Urvan Cargo, with its van body, 5.08 m length, 2.285 m height and only three seats, provides a larger enclosed cargo area than the Hilux’s pickup bed.
Is either model discontinued?
Yes, the Nissan NV350 Urvan Cargo is listed as discontinued, whereas the Toyota Hilux 2.4 G is currently available.