Nissan NV350 Urvan Cargo (2015) vs Honda Civic 1.8 E (2016)
A full spec-by-spec comparison of Nissan NV350 Urvan Cargo (2015) vs Honda Civic 1.8 E (2016) — engine, performance, dimensions, features and price, with the differences highlighted to help you decide.
| Specification | Nissan NV350 Urvan Cargo (2015) Nissan ₱1,158,000 | Honda Civic 1.8 E (2016) Honda ₱1,138,000 |
|---|---|---|
| Overview | ||
| Model Year | 2015 | 2016 |
| Warranty | 100,000km/3-years | 100,000km/3-years |
| Availability | Discontinued | Current |
| Engine & Drivetrain | ||
| Engine Type | Inline-4 | Inline-4 |
| Displacement | 2488cc | 1789cc |
| Valvetrain | DOHC 16-valve | SOHC 16-valve |
| Aspiration | Variable Turbocharger (VGS) | Programmed Fuel Injection |
| Fuel Type | Diesel | Gas |
| Max Power | 129 PS @ 3200 rpm | 141 PS @ 6500 rpm |
| Max Torque | 356 Nm @ 1400-2000 rpm | 174 Nm @ 4300 rpm |
| Transmission | 5-Speed M/T (Dash-Mounted) | CVT |
| Compression Ratio | — | 10.6:1 |
| Drivetrain | — | FWD |
| Body & Dimensions | ||
| Body Type | Van | Sedan |
| Segment | M | C |
| Doors | 4 | 4 |
| Seating Capacity | 3 | 2+3 |
| Length (mm) | 5080 | 4633 |
| Width (mm) | 1695 | 1799 |
| Height (mm) | 2285 | 1416 |
| Wheelbase (mm) | 2940 | 2700 |
| Curb Weight (kg) | 1825 | 1239 |
| Fuel Tank (L) | 65 | 47 |
| Construction | — | Unibody |
| Chassis, Wheels & Brakes | ||
| Front Suspension | Torsion Bar with Front Stabilizer | MacPherson Strut with Stabilizer |
| Rear Suspension | Leaf Spring | Independent Multi Link |
| Front Wheels | 15 | 16 Alloy |
| Rear Wheels | 15 | 16 Alloy |
| Front Tires | 195/80R15LT | 215/55 R16 |
| Rear Tires | 195/80R15LT | 215/55 R16 |
| Rear Brakes | Drum | Disc |
| Steering Type | Power Steering | Electric |
| Steering Column | Manual Tilt | Tilt & Telescopic |
| Tire Pressure Monitoring | No | No |
| Differential Lock | No | No |
| Front Brakes | — | Disc |
| Safety | ||
| Anti-lock Braking (ABS) | No | Yes |
| Electronic Brakeforce Distribution | No | Yes |
| Brake Assist | No | Yes |
| Parking Sensors | No | Yes |
| Stability Control | No | No |
| Traction Control | No | No |
| Vehicle Dynamic Control | No | No |
| Forward Collision Mitigation | No | No |
| Blind Spot Warning | No | No |
| Hill Start Assist | No | Yes |
| Hill Descent Control | No | No |
| Auto Stop/Start | No | No |
| Driver Airbag | Yes | Yes |
| Knee Airbag | No | No |
| Passenger Airbag | No | Yes |
| Front Curtain Airbags | No | No |
| Rear Curtain Airbags | No | No |
| Rear Side Airbags | No | No |
| Engine Immobilizer | No | Yes |
| Security Alarm | No | Yes |
| Door Locking | Standard | Central Locking |
| Comfort & Convenience | ||
| Air Conditioning | Manual, Dial Type | Single Zone Automatic |
| Rear A/C Vents | Yes | Yes |
| Seat Material | Fabric | Fabric |
| Parking Brake | Manual | Electronic |
| Key Type | Manual | Smart Entry |
| Push-Button Start | No | Yes |
| Cruise Control | No | Yes |
| Multi-Info Display | No | Yes |
| Paddle Shifters | No | No |
| Reverse Camera | No | Yes |
| Auto Headlights | No | Yes |
| Power Windows | Yes | No |
| Power Seats | No | Yes |
| Remote Trunk Release | No | No |
| Eco Mode | No | Yes |
| Antenna | yes | yes |
| Infotainment & Audio | ||
| Speakers | 2 | — |
| Touchscreen | No | Yes |
| Navigation | No | No |
| Bluetooth | No | Yes |
| Apple CarPlay | No | No |
| Android Auto | No | No |
| USB | No | Yes |
| AUX Input | No | No |
| AM/FM Radio | No | Yes |
| CD Player | No | No |
| DVD Player | No | No |
| MP3 Playback | No | Yes |
| iPod Support | No | Yes |
| SD Card Slot | No | No |
| Lighting | ||
| Headlights | Halogen | LED |
| Fog Lights | Yes | Yes |
| Daytime Running Lights | No | Yes |
Nissan NV350 Urvan Cargo (2015) vs Honda Civic 1.8 E (2016): which should you buy?
The Honda Civic 1.8 E (₱1,138,000) is the better value for most Filipino buyers. It is cheaper than the Nissan NV350 Urvan Cargo (₱1,158,000) and offers significantly more power (141 PS vs 129 PS) and a more efficient gas powertrain. As a sedan with a 2+3 seating capacity, it is far more practical for daily commuting and family errands, whereas the van is built for cargo and has only 3 seats. Given the Civic’s lower price, superior performance, and suitability for a sedan lifestyle, it is the recommended choice unless you need the NV350’s space for heavy loads.