Nissan NV350 Urvan Cargo (2015) vs Hyundai Tucson 2.0 GL MT (2016)
A full spec-by-spec comparison of Nissan NV350 Urvan Cargo (2015) vs Hyundai Tucson 2.0 GL MT (2016) — engine, performance, dimensions, features and price, with the differences highlighted to help you decide.
| Specification | Nissan NV350 Urvan Cargo (2015) Nissan ₱1,158,000 | Hyundai Tucson 2.0 GL MT (2016) Hyundai ₱1,098,000 |
|---|---|---|
| Overview | ||
| Model Year | 2015 | 2016 |
| Warranty | 100,000km/3-years | Unlimited/5-years |
| Availability | Discontinued | Current |
| Engine & Drivetrain | ||
| Engine Type | Inline-4 | Inline-4 |
| Displacement | 2488cc | 1999cc |
| Valvetrain | DOHC 16-valve | DOHC 16-valve |
| Aspiration | Variable Turbocharger (VGS) | Naturally Aspirated |
| Fuel Type | Diesel | Gas |
| Max Power | 129 PS @ 3200 rpm | 155 PS @ 6200 rpm |
| Max Torque | 356 Nm @ 1400-2000 rpm | 192 Nm @ 4000 rpm |
| Transmission | 5-Speed M/T (Dash-Mounted) | 6-Speed M/T |
| Drivetrain | — | FWD |
| Body & Dimensions | ||
| Body Type | Van | Crossover |
| Segment | M | J |
| Doors | 4 | 5 |
| Seating Capacity | 3 | 2+3 |
| Length (mm) | 5080 | 4475 |
| Width (mm) | 1695 | 1850 |
| Height (mm) | 2285 | 1660 |
| Wheelbase (mm) | 2940 | 2670 |
| Curb Weight (kg) | 1825 | 1435 |
| Fuel Tank (L) | 65 | 62 |
| Construction | — | Unibody |
| Chassis, Wheels & Brakes | ||
| Front Suspension | Torsion Bar with Front Stabilizer | MacPherson Strut with Coil Spring |
| Rear Suspension | Leaf Spring | Multi-Link |
| Front Wheels | 15 | 17 Alloy |
| Rear Wheels | 15 | 17 Alloy |
| Front Tires | 195/80R15LT | 225/60 R17 |
| Rear Tires | 195/80R15LT | 225/60 R17 |
| Rear Brakes | Drum | Disc |
| Steering Type | Power Steering | EPS |
| Steering Column | Manual Tilt | tilt + tele |
| Tire Pressure Monitoring | No | No |
| Differential Lock | No | No |
| Front Brakes | — | Disc |
| Safety | ||
| Anti-lock Braking (ABS) | No | Yes |
| Electronic Brakeforce Distribution | No | Yes |
| Brake Assist | No | No |
| Parking Sensors | No | No |
| Stability Control | No | No |
| Traction Control | No | No |
| Vehicle Dynamic Control | No | No |
| Forward Collision Mitigation | No | No |
| Blind Spot Warning | No | No |
| Hill Start Assist | No | No |
| Hill Descent Control | No | No |
| Auto Stop/Start | No | No |
| Driver Airbag | Yes | Yes |
| Knee Airbag | No | Yes |
| Passenger Airbag | No | Yes |
| Front Curtain Airbags | No | No |
| Rear Curtain Airbags | No | No |
| Rear Side Airbags | No | No |
| Engine Immobilizer | No | No |
| Security Alarm | No | Yes |
| Door Locking | Standard | Central Locking |
| Comfort & Convenience | ||
| Air Conditioning | Manual, Dial Type | Manual Aircon |
| Rear A/C Vents | Yes | No |
| Seat Material | Fabric | Fabric |
| Parking Brake | Manual | Manual |
| Key Type | Manual | Keyless Entry |
| Push-Button Start | No | No |
| Cruise Control | No | No |
| Multi-Info Display | No | No |
| Paddle Shifters | No | No |
| Reverse Camera | No | No |
| Auto Headlights | No | No |
| Power Windows | Yes | Yes |
| Power Seats | No | No |
| Remote Trunk Release | No | No |
| Eco Mode | No | No |
| Antenna | yes | yes |
| Infotainment & Audio | ||
| Speakers | 2 | 6 |
| Touchscreen | No | No |
| Navigation | No | No |
| Bluetooth | No | No |
| Apple CarPlay | No | No |
| Android Auto | No | No |
| USB | No | Yes |
| AUX Input | No | Yes |
| AM/FM Radio | No | Yes |
| CD Player | No | Yes |
| DVD Player | No | No |
| MP3 Playback | No | Yes |
| iPod Support | No | No |
| SD Card Slot | No | No |
| Lighting | ||
| Headlights | Halogen | Halogen |
| Fog Lights | Yes | Yes |
| Daytime Running Lights | No | Yes |
Nissan NV350 Urvan Cargo (2015) vs Hyundai Tucson 2.0 GL MT (2016): which should you buy?
For a Filipino buyer whose priority is cargo capacity and commercial utility, the 2015 Nissan NV350 Urvan Cargo is the clear choice. It offers a massive interior volume (5.08 m length, 2.285 m height) and a three‑seat layout designed for freight, plus a diesel engine that delivers 129 PS and a robust 356 Nm of torque at low revs—ideal for hauling heavy loads and city deliveries. Although discontinued, its price of ₱1,158,000 is only slightly higher than the Hyundai Tucson, and the 100,000 km/3‑year warranty provides reasonable protection for a work vehicle. Conversely, the 2016 Hyundai Tucson 2.0 GL MT targets private owners who need a compact, comfortable daily driver. It is cheaper (₱1,098,000), comes with a five‑year unlimited‑km warranty, and offers a more refined gasoline engine with 155 PS and 192 Nm, better suited for passenger comfort and fuel‑efficiency on roads. The Tucson’s unibody crossover body, five doors, and 2+3 seating make it practical for families but unsuitable for bulk cargo. In summary, choose the Nissan Urvan if you need a durable, high‑torque van for business use; choose the Hyundai Tucson if you prefer a newer, lower‑cost, family‑oriented SUV with a longer warranty.
Frequently asked questions
Which vehicle is cheaper?
The Hyundai Tucson 2.0 GL MT (2016) is cheaper at ₱1,098,000 compared to the Nissan NV350 Urvan Cargo at ₱1,158,000.
Which model has more power?
The Hyundai Tucson produces 155 PS, which is higher than the Nissan Urvan’s 129 PS, though the Urvan delivers significantly more torque (356 Nm vs 192 Nm).
Which is better for cargo or commercial use?
The Nissan NV350 Urvan Cargo is designed for freight with a larger van body, three‑seat layout, and higher low‑end torque, making it more suitable for commercial hauling.
What warranty coverage do they offer?
The Nissan Urvan provides a 100,000 km or 3‑year warranty, while the Hyundai Tucson comes with an unlimited‑kilometer 5‑year warranty, offering longer protection for the Tucson.