Nissan NV350 Urvan Cargo (2015) vs Toyota Innova 2.0 E AT (2016)
A full spec-by-spec comparison of Nissan NV350 Urvan Cargo (2015) vs Toyota Innova 2.0 E AT (2016) — engine, performance, dimensions, features and price, with the differences highlighted to help you decide.
| Specification | Nissan NV350 Urvan Cargo (2015) Nissan ₱1,158,000 | Toyota Innova 2.0 E AT (2016) Toyota ₱1,208,000 |
|---|---|---|
| Overview | ||
| Model Year | 2015 | 2016 |
| Warranty | 100,000km/3-years | 100,000km/3-years |
| Availability | Discontinued | Current |
| Engine & Drivetrain | ||
| Engine Type | Inline-4 | Inline-4 |
| Displacement | 2488cc | 1998cc |
| Valvetrain | DOHC 16-valve | DOHC 16-Valve |
| Aspiration | Variable Turbocharger (VGS) | Naturally Aspirated |
| Fuel Type | Diesel | Gas |
| Max Power | 129 PS @ 3200 rpm | 136 PS @ 5600 rpm |
| Max Torque | 356 Nm @ 1400-2000 rpm | 183 Nm @ 4000 rpm |
| Transmission | 5-Speed M/T (Dash-Mounted) | 6-Speed A/T |
| Drivetrain | — | RWD |
| Body & Dimensions | ||
| Body Type | Van | MPV |
| Segment | M | M |
| Doors | 4 | 5 |
| Seating Capacity | 3 | 2+3+3 |
| Length (mm) | 5080 | 4735 |
| Width (mm) | 1695 | 1830 |
| Height (mm) | 2285 | 1795 |
| Wheelbase (mm) | 2940 | 2750 |
| Curb Weight (kg) | 1825 | — |
| Fuel Tank (L) | 65 | 55 |
| Construction | — | Body-on-frame |
| Chassis, Wheels & Brakes | ||
| Front Suspension | Torsion Bar with Front Stabilizer | Double Wishbone w/ Stabilizer |
| Rear Suspension | Leaf Spring | 4-Link w/ Coil Spring |
| Front Wheels | 15 | 16 |
| Rear Wheels | 15 | 16 |
| Front Tires | 195/80R15LT | 205/65 R16 |
| Rear Tires | 195/80R15LT | 205/65 R16 |
| Rear Brakes | Drum | Drum |
| Steering Type | Power Steering | — |
| Steering Column | Manual Tilt | Tilt & Telescopic |
| Tire Pressure Monitoring | No | No |
| Differential Lock | No | No |
| Front Brakes | — | Disc |
| Safety | ||
| Anti-lock Braking (ABS) | No | Yes |
| Electronic Brakeforce Distribution | No | No |
| Brake Assist | No | No |
| Parking Sensors | No | No |
| Stability Control | No | No |
| Traction Control | No | No |
| Vehicle Dynamic Control | No | No |
| Forward Collision Mitigation | No | No |
| Blind Spot Warning | No | No |
| Hill Start Assist | No | No |
| Hill Descent Control | No | No |
| Auto Stop/Start | No | No |
| Driver Airbag | Yes | Yes |
| Knee Airbag | No | Yes |
| Passenger Airbag | No | Yes |
| Front Curtain Airbags | No | No |
| Rear Curtain Airbags | No | No |
| Rear Side Airbags | No | No |
| Engine Immobilizer | No | No |
| Security Alarm | No | Yes |
| Door Locking | Standard | Central Locking |
| Comfort & Convenience | ||
| Air Conditioning | Manual, Dial Type | Manual Aircon |
| Rear A/C Vents | Yes | Yes |
| Seat Material | Fabric | Fabric |
| Parking Brake | Manual | Manual |
| Key Type | Manual | Keyless Entry |
| Push-Button Start | No | No |
| Cruise Control | No | No |
| Multi-Info Display | No | Yes |
| Paddle Shifters | No | No |
| Reverse Camera | No | No |
| Auto Headlights | No | No |
| Power Windows | Yes | Yes |
| Power Seats | No | No |
| Remote Trunk Release | No | No |
| Eco Mode | No | Yes |
| Antenna | yes | yes |
| Infotainment & Audio | ||
| Speakers | 2 | 6 |
| Touchscreen | No | No |
| Navigation | No | Yes |
| Bluetooth | No | No |
| Apple CarPlay | No | No |
| Android Auto | No | No |
| USB | No | Yes |
| AUX Input | No | Yes |
| AM/FM Radio | No | Yes |
| CD Player | No | Yes |
| DVD Player | No | No |
| MP3 Playback | No | Yes |
| iPod Support | No | No |
| SD Card Slot | No | No |
| Lighting | ||
| Headlights | Halogen | Halogen |
| Fog Lights | Yes | Yes |
| Daytime Running Lights | No | No |
| Performance & Economy | ||
| 0–60 mph | — | no |
| 0–100 km/h | — | no |
| Top Speed | — | no |
| Fuel Economy (City) | — | no |
| Fuel Economy (Highway) | — | no |
| Fuel Economy (Combined) | — | no |
Nissan NV350 Urvan Cargo (2015) vs Toyota Innova 2.0 E AT (2016): which should you buy?
For a Filipino buyer whose priority is cargo capacity and low‑end torque for hauling, the 2015 Nissan NV350 Urvan Cargo is the better pick. It costs ₱1,158,000, about ₱50,000 less than the 2016 Toyota Innova 2.0 E AT, and its diesel engine delivers a massive 356 Nm of torque from 1,400‑2,000 rpm, far surpassing the Innova’s 183 Nm. That torque advantage makes the Urvan far more capable of moving heavy loads, especially in city traffic. Its van body (5,080 mm long, 2,285 mm high) and three‑seat layout also give it a far larger cargo volume than the Innova’s passenger‑oriented cabin. However, the Innova offers a slightly higher peak power (136 PS vs 129 PS), a smoother 6‑speed automatic, and a current‑model status, which may appeal to buyers who value a refined driving experience, better fuel type (gasoline) for urban use, and a brand‑new warranty. The Innova’s RWD layout and modern transmission also give it a more car‑like feel for daily commuting or family trips. In short, choose the Urvan if you need a rugged, torque‑rich work van and want to save on purchase price; choose the Innova if you prefer a newer, more comfortable passenger vehicle with automatic transmission and are less concerned about cargo capacity.
Frequently asked questions
Which vehicle is cheaper?
The Nissan NV350 Urvan Cargo is priced at ₱1,158,000, which is about ₱50,000 less than the Toyota Innova 2.0 E AT at ₱1,208,000.
Which model has more power and torque?
The Innova produces slightly more peak power at 136 PS compared to the Urvan’s 129 PS, but the Urvan delivers far higher torque—356 Nm versus the Innova’s 183 Nm.
Is the Urvan still available?
The Urvan is listed as discontinued, whereas the Innova is a current‑model vehicle.
Which vehicle is better suited for cargo hauling?
The Urvan’s diesel engine with high low‑rpm torque, larger van dimensions, and three‑seat layout make it far more suitable for cargo hauling than the passenger‑focused Innova.