Nissan NV350 Urvan Cargo (2015) vs Toyota Innova 2.8 J MT (2016)
A full spec-by-spec comparison of Nissan NV350 Urvan Cargo (2015) vs Toyota Innova 2.8 J MT (2016) — engine, performance, dimensions, features and price, with the differences highlighted to help you decide.
| Specification | Nissan NV350 Urvan Cargo (2015) Nissan ₱1,158,000 | Toyota Innova 2.8 J MT (2016) Toyota ₱1,096,000 |
|---|---|---|
| Overview | ||
| Model Year | 2015 | 2016 |
| Warranty | 100,000km/3-years | 100,000km/3-years |
| Availability | Discontinued | Current |
| Engine & Drivetrain | ||
| Engine Type | Inline-4 | Inline-4 |
| Displacement | 2488cc | 2755cc |
| Valvetrain | DOHC 16-valve | DOHC 16-Valve |
| Aspiration | Variable Turbocharger (VGS) | VN Turbo Intercooler CRDi |
| Fuel Type | Diesel | Diesel |
| Max Power | 129 PS @ 3200 rpm | 171 PS @ 3600 rpm |
| Max Torque | 356 Nm @ 1400-2000 rpm | 360 Nm @ 1200-3400 rpm |
| Transmission | 5-Speed M/T (Dash-Mounted) | 5-Speed M/T |
| Drivetrain | — | RWD |
| Body & Dimensions | ||
| Body Type | Van | MPV |
| Segment | M | M |
| Doors | 4 | 5 |
| Seating Capacity | 3 | 2+3+3 |
| Length (mm) | 5080 | 4735 |
| Width (mm) | 1695 | 1830 |
| Height (mm) | 2285 | 1795 |
| Wheelbase (mm) | 2940 | 2750 |
| Curb Weight (kg) | 1825 | — |
| Fuel Tank (L) | 65 | — |
| Construction | — | Body-on-frame |
| Chassis, Wheels & Brakes | ||
| Front Suspension | Torsion Bar with Front Stabilizer | Double Wishbone, Coil Springs |
| Rear Suspension | Leaf Spring | 4-Link w/ Coil Spring |
| Front Wheels | 15 | 16 |
| Rear Wheels | 15 | 16 |
| Front Tires | 195/80R15LT | 205/65 R16 |
| Rear Tires | 195/80R15LT | 205/65 R16 |
| Rear Brakes | Drum | Drum |
| Steering Type | Power Steering | Power |
| Steering Column | Manual Tilt | Tilt & Telescopic |
| Tire Pressure Monitoring | No | No |
| Differential Lock | No | No |
| Front Brakes | — | Disc |
| Safety | ||
| Anti-lock Braking (ABS) | No | Yes |
| Electronic Brakeforce Distribution | No | No |
| Brake Assist | No | No |
| Parking Sensors | No | No |
| Stability Control | No | No |
| Traction Control | No | No |
| Vehicle Dynamic Control | No | No |
| Forward Collision Mitigation | No | No |
| Blind Spot Warning | No | No |
| Hill Start Assist | No | No |
| Hill Descent Control | No | No |
| Auto Stop/Start | No | No |
| Driver Airbag | Yes | Yes |
| Knee Airbag | No | Yes |
| Passenger Airbag | No | Yes |
| Front Curtain Airbags | No | No |
| Rear Curtain Airbags | No | No |
| Rear Side Airbags | No | No |
| Engine Immobilizer | No | No |
| Security Alarm | No | Yes |
| Door Locking | Standard | Central Locking |
| Comfort & Convenience | ||
| Air Conditioning | Manual, Dial Type | Manual |
| Rear A/C Vents | Yes | Yes |
| Seat Material | Fabric | Fabric |
| Parking Brake | Manual | Manual |
| Key Type | Manual | Keyless Entry |
| Push-Button Start | No | No |
| Cruise Control | No | No |
| Multi-Info Display | No | No |
| Paddle Shifters | No | No |
| Reverse Camera | No | No |
| Auto Headlights | No | No |
| Power Windows | Yes | Yes |
| Power Seats | No | No |
| Remote Trunk Release | No | No |
| Eco Mode | No | Yes |
| Antenna | yes | yes |
| Infotainment & Audio | ||
| Speakers | 2 | 4 |
| Touchscreen | No | No |
| Navigation | No | No |
| Bluetooth | No | No |
| Apple CarPlay | No | No |
| Android Auto | No | No |
| USB | No | No |
| AUX Input | No | Yes |
| AM/FM Radio | No | Yes |
| CD Player | No | Yes |
| DVD Player | No | No |
| MP3 Playback | No | Yes |
| iPod Support | No | No |
| SD Card Slot | No | No |
| Lighting | ||
| Headlights | Halogen | Halogen |
| Fog Lights | Yes | Yes |
| Daytime Running Lights | No | No |
| Performance & Economy | ||
| 0–60 mph | — | no |
| 0–100 km/h | — | no |
| Top Speed | — | no |
| Fuel Economy (City) | — | no |
| Fuel Economy (Highway) | — | no |
| Fuel Economy (Combined) | — | no |
Nissan NV350 Urvan Cargo (2015) vs Toyota Innova 2.8 J MT (2016): which should you buy?
For a Filipino buyer whose primary need is cargo capacity and a vehicle that can double as a workhorse, the 2015 Nissan NV350 Urvan Cargo is the logical pick despite its higher price of ₱1,158,000. It offers a massive footprint (5,080 mm long, 1,695 mm wide, 2,285 mm high) and a three‑seat layout that maximises load space, making it ideal for small‑business owners, shuttle services, or anyone needing a dedicated van. Its 2.5‑L turbo‑charged diesel delivers 129 PS and a robust 356 Nm of torque low down the rev range, which is sufficient for heavy loads, though it is less powerful than the Innova. The trade‑off is that the Urvan is discontinued, so parts and resale value may be concerns, and it lacks the more modern amenities of a passenger‑focused SUV. The 2016 Toyota Innova 2.8 J MT, priced at ₱1,096,000, is cheaper, newer, and still in production, offering a stronger 171 PS engine and slightly higher torque (360 Nm) with a broader rev band, making it more lively for mixed passenger‑cargo use. However, its dimensions are smaller and it seats more passengers, so it sacrifices pure cargo volume. Choose the Urvan if you need maximum load space and are comfortable with a discontinued model; choose the Innova if you prefer a current, more powerful, and slightly cheaper SUV that can still carry modest cargo while serving daily family transport.
Frequently asked questions
Which model is cheaper?
The 2016 Toyota Innova 2.8 J MT costs ₱1,096,000, which is ₱62,000 less than the 2015 Nissan NV350 Urvan Cargo priced at ₱1,158,000.
Which vehicle has more power?
The Toyota Innova produces 171 PS, while the Nissan Urvan delivers 129 PS, making the Innova the more powerful option.
Is the Nissan Urvan still available new?
No, the Nissan NV350 Urvan Cargo is listed as discontinued, meaning new units are no longer sold by the manufacturer.
Which vehicle is better for cargo hauling?
The Nissan Urvan, with its larger dimensions (5,080 mm length, 2,285 mm height) and a three‑seat configuration, provides far more cargo space than the Toyota Innova, which is designed more for passenger use.