Nissan NV350 Urvan Cargo (2015) vs Ford Ranger XLT 2.2L 4×2 AT (2017)
A full spec-by-spec comparison of Nissan NV350 Urvan Cargo (2015) vs Ford Ranger XLT 2.2L 4×2 AT (2017) — engine, performance, dimensions, features and price, with the differences highlighted to help you decide.
| Specification | Nissan NV350 Urvan Cargo (2015) Nissan ₱1,158,000 | Ford Ranger XLT 2.2L 4×2 AT (2017) Ford ₱1,188,000 |
|---|---|---|
| Overview | ||
| Model Year | 2015 | 2017 |
| Warranty | 100,000km/3-years | 100,000km/3-years |
| Availability | Discontinued | Current |
| Engine & Drivetrain | ||
| Engine Type | Inline-4 | Inline-4 |
| Displacement | 2488cc | 2198cc |
| Valvetrain | DOHC 16-valve | DOHC 16-valve |
| Aspiration | Variable Turbocharger (VGS) | Turbocharged |
| Fuel Type | Diesel | Diesel |
| Max Power | 129 PS @ 3200 rpm | 160 PS @ 3200 rpm |
| Max Torque | 356 Nm @ 1400-2000 rpm | 385 Nm @ 1600-2500 rpm |
| Transmission | 5-Speed M/T (Dash-Mounted) | 6-Speed A/T |
| Drivetrain | — | RWD |
| Body & Dimensions | ||
| Body Type | Van | Pick Up |
| Segment | M | Pick-Up |
| Doors | 4 | 4 |
| Seating Capacity | 3 | 2+3 |
| Length (mm) | 5080 | 5277 |
| Width (mm) | 1695 | 2163 |
| Height (mm) | 2285 | 1821 |
| Wheelbase (mm) | 2940 | 3220 |
| Curb Weight (kg) | 1825 | — |
| Fuel Tank (L) | 65 | 80 |
| Chassis, Wheels & Brakes | ||
| Front Suspension | Torsion Bar with Front Stabilizer | Double Wishbone with Coil Spring |
| Rear Suspension | Leaf Spring | Leaf Spring |
| Front Wheels | 15 | 17 |
| Rear Wheels | 15 | 17 |
| Front Tires | 195/80R15LT | 265/65 R17 |
| Rear Tires | 195/80R15LT | 265/65 R17 |
| Rear Brakes | Drum | Drum |
| Steering Type | Power Steering | EPS |
| Steering Column | Manual Tilt | — |
| Tire Pressure Monitoring | No | No |
| Differential Lock | No | No |
| Front Brakes | — | Disc |
| Safety | ||
| Anti-lock Braking (ABS) | No | Yes |
| Electronic Brakeforce Distribution | No | Yes |
| Brake Assist | No | No |
| Parking Sensors | No | No |
| Stability Control | No | Yes |
| Traction Control | No | Yes |
| Vehicle Dynamic Control | No | No |
| Forward Collision Mitigation | No | No |
| Blind Spot Warning | No | No |
| Hill Start Assist | No | Yes |
| Hill Descent Control | No | Yes |
| Auto Stop/Start | No | No |
| Driver Airbag | Yes | Yes |
| Knee Airbag | No | Yes |
| Passenger Airbag | No | Yes |
| Front Curtain Airbags | No | No |
| Rear Curtain Airbags | No | No |
| Rear Side Airbags | No | No |
| Engine Immobilizer | No | No |
| Security Alarm | No | Yes |
| Door Locking | Standard | Central Locking |
| Comfort & Convenience | ||
| Air Conditioning | Manual, Dial Type | Single Zone Automatic |
| Rear A/C Vents | Yes | Yes |
| Seat Material | Fabric | Fabric |
| Parking Brake | Manual | Manual |
| Key Type | Manual | Keyless Entry |
| Push-Button Start | No | No |
| Cruise Control | No | Yes |
| Multi-Info Display | No | No |
| Paddle Shifters | No | No |
| Reverse Camera | No | No |
| Auto Headlights | No | No |
| Power Windows | Yes | Yes |
| Power Seats | No | Yes |
| Remote Trunk Release | No | No |
| Eco Mode | No | No |
| Antenna | yes | yes |
| Infotainment & Audio | ||
| Speakers | 2 | 6 |
| Touchscreen | No | No |
| Navigation | No | No |
| Bluetooth | No | No |
| Apple CarPlay | No | No |
| Android Auto | No | No |
| USB | No | Yes |
| AUX Input | No | Yes |
| AM/FM Radio | No | Yes |
| CD Player | No | Yes |
| DVD Player | No | No |
| MP3 Playback | No | Yes |
| iPod Support | No | Yes |
| SD Card Slot | No | No |
| Lighting | ||
| Headlights | Halogen | Halogen |
| Fog Lights | Yes | Yes |
| Daytime Running Lights | No | No |
Nissan NV350 Urvan Cargo (2015) vs Ford Ranger XLT 2.2L 4×2 AT (2017): which should you buy?
Both the 2015 Nissan NV350 Urvan Cargo and the 2017 Ford Ranger XLT 2.2L 4×2 AT sit in a similar price bracket (₱1,158,000 vs ₱1,188,000) and share a 3‑year/100,000 km warranty, but they serve very different purposes. The Urvan is a full‑size van with a massive interior volume (5.08 m long, 1.70 m wide, 2.29 m high) and a modest 3‑seat layout, making it ideal for businesses that need cargo space or a shuttle that can carry a few passengers and a lot of gear. Its 2.5‑L turbo‑charged diesel produces 129 PS and 356 Nm, enough for steady hauling but less punch than the Ranger. The Ranger, on the other hand, is a pickup with a shorter wheelbase (5.28 m) but a wider track (2.16 m) and a higher‑output 2.2‑L engine delivering 160 PS and 385 Nm, giving better acceleration and towing capability. It also offers a 6‑speed automatic and a 2+3 seating arrangement, suiting small families or work crews who need both passenger space and a bed for tools. Choose the Urvan if cargo capacity and a van‑style cabin are priorities; pick the Ranger if you need more power, a modern automatic transmission, and the flexibility of a pickup bed for mixed passenger‑and‑load tasks.
Frequently asked questions
Which vehicle is cheaper?
The Nissan NV350 Urvan Cargo is priced at ₱1,158,000, which is ₱30,000 less than the Ford Ranger XLT priced at ₱1,188,000.
Which model has more power?
The Ford Ranger XLT 2.2L produces 160 PS, while the Nissan Urvan Cargo produces 129 PS, so the Ranger has the higher power output.
Is the Ranger more suitable for daily commuting?
The Ranger offers a 2+3 seating layout and an automatic transmission, making it more comfortable for daily commuting with a small family compared to the Urvan’s 3‑seat van configuration.
Which vehicle provides greater cargo capacity?
The Nissan Urvan Cargo, with its larger overall dimensions (5.08 m length, 1.70 m width, 2.29 m height) and van body type, is better suited for bulk cargo than the pickup‑style Ranger.