Nissan NV350 Urvan Cargo (2015) vs Ford Ranger XLT 2.2L 4×2 AT (2017)

A full spec-by-spec comparison of Nissan NV350 Urvan Cargo (2015) vs Ford Ranger XLT 2.2L 4×2 AT (2017) — engine, performance, dimensions, features and price, with the differences highlighted to help you decide.

Specification Nissan NV350 Urvan Cargo (2015) Nissan ₱1,158,000 Ford Ranger XLT 2.2L 4×2 AT (2017) Ford ₱1,188,000
Overview
Model Year 2015 2017
Warranty 100,000km/3-years 100,000km/3-years
Availability Discontinued Current
Engine & Drivetrain
Engine Type Inline-4 Inline-4
Displacement 2488cc 2198cc
Valvetrain DOHC 16-valve DOHC 16-valve
Aspiration Variable Turbocharger (VGS) Turbocharged
Fuel Type Diesel Diesel
Max Power 129 PS @ 3200 rpm 160 PS @ 3200 rpm
Max Torque 356 Nm @ 1400-2000 rpm 385 Nm @ 1600-2500 rpm
Transmission 5-Speed M/T (Dash-Mounted) 6-Speed A/T
Drivetrain RWD
Body & Dimensions
Body Type Van Pick Up
Segment M Pick-Up
Doors 4 4
Seating Capacity 3 2+3
Length (mm) 5080 5277
Width (mm) 1695 2163
Height (mm) 2285 1821
Wheelbase (mm) 2940 3220
Curb Weight (kg) 1825
Fuel Tank (L) 65 80
Chassis, Wheels & Brakes
Front Suspension Torsion Bar with Front Stabilizer Double Wishbone with Coil Spring
Rear Suspension Leaf Spring Leaf Spring
Front Wheels 15 17
Rear Wheels 15 17
Front Tires 195/80R15LT 265/65 R17
Rear Tires 195/80R15LT 265/65 R17
Rear Brakes Drum Drum
Steering Type Power Steering EPS
Steering Column Manual Tilt
Tire Pressure Monitoring No No
Differential Lock No No
Front Brakes Disc
Safety
Anti-lock Braking (ABS) No Yes
Electronic Brakeforce Distribution No Yes
Brake Assist No No
Parking Sensors No No
Stability Control No Yes
Traction Control No Yes
Vehicle Dynamic Control No No
Forward Collision Mitigation No No
Blind Spot Warning No No
Hill Start Assist No Yes
Hill Descent Control No Yes
Auto Stop/Start No No
Driver Airbag Yes Yes
Knee Airbag No Yes
Passenger Airbag No Yes
Front Curtain Airbags No No
Rear Curtain Airbags No No
Rear Side Airbags No No
Engine Immobilizer No No
Security Alarm No Yes
Door Locking Standard Central Locking
Comfort & Convenience
Air Conditioning Manual, Dial Type Single Zone Automatic
Rear A/C Vents Yes Yes
Seat Material Fabric Fabric
Parking Brake Manual Manual
Key Type Manual Keyless Entry
Push-Button Start No No
Cruise Control No Yes
Multi-Info Display No No
Paddle Shifters No No
Reverse Camera No No
Auto Headlights No No
Power Windows Yes Yes
Power Seats No Yes
Remote Trunk Release No No
Eco Mode No No
Antenna yes yes
Infotainment & Audio
Speakers 2 6
Touchscreen No No
Navigation No No
Bluetooth No No
Apple CarPlay No No
Android Auto No No
USB No Yes
AUX Input No Yes
AM/FM Radio No Yes
CD Player No Yes
DVD Player No No
MP3 Playback No Yes
iPod Support No Yes
SD Card Slot No No
Lighting
Headlights Halogen Halogen
Fog Lights Yes Yes
Daytime Running Lights No No
Keep comparing Add another model to this matchup — line up to four side by side.

Nissan NV350 Urvan Cargo (2015) vs Ford Ranger XLT 2.2L 4×2 AT (2017): which should you buy?

Both the 2015 Nissan NV350 Urvan Cargo and the 2017 Ford Ranger XLT 2.2L 4×2 AT sit in a similar price bracket (₱1,158,000 vs ₱1,188,000) and share a 3‑year/100,000 km warranty, but they serve very different purposes. The Urvan is a full‑size van with a massive interior volume (5.08 m long, 1.70 m wide, 2.29 m high) and a modest 3‑seat layout, making it ideal for businesses that need cargo space or a shuttle that can carry a few passengers and a lot of gear. Its 2.5‑L turbo‑charged diesel produces 129 PS and 356 Nm, enough for steady hauling but less punch than the Ranger. The Ranger, on the other hand, is a pickup with a shorter wheelbase (5.28 m) but a wider track (2.16 m) and a higher‑output 2.2‑L engine delivering 160 PS and 385 Nm, giving better acceleration and towing capability. It also offers a 6‑speed automatic and a 2+3 seating arrangement, suiting small families or work crews who need both passenger space and a bed for tools. Choose the Urvan if cargo capacity and a van‑style cabin are priorities; pick the Ranger if you need more power, a modern automatic transmission, and the flexibility of a pickup bed for mixed passenger‑and‑load tasks.

Frequently asked questions

Which vehicle is cheaper?

The Nissan NV350 Urvan Cargo is priced at ₱1,158,000, which is ₱30,000 less than the Ford Ranger XLT priced at ₱1,188,000.

Which model has more power?

The Ford Ranger XLT 2.2L produces 160 PS, while the Nissan Urvan Cargo produces 129 PS, so the Ranger has the higher power output.

Is the Ranger more suitable for daily commuting?

The Ranger offers a 2+3 seating layout and an automatic transmission, making it more comfortable for daily commuting with a small family compared to the Urvan’s 3‑seat van configuration.

Which vehicle provides greater cargo capacity?

The Nissan Urvan Cargo, with its larger overall dimensions (5.08 m length, 1.70 m width, 2.29 m height) and van body type, is better suited for bulk cargo than the pickup‑style Ranger.