Nissan NV350 Urvan Cargo (2015) vs Ford Ranger XLT 2.2L 4×2 MT (2017)
A full spec-by-spec comparison of Nissan NV350 Urvan Cargo (2015) vs Ford Ranger XLT 2.2L 4×2 MT (2017) — engine, performance, dimensions, features and price, with the differences highlighted to help you decide.
| Specification | Nissan NV350 Urvan Cargo (2015) Nissan ₱1,158,000 | Ford Ranger XLT 2.2L 4×2 MT (2017) Ford ₱1,219,000 |
|---|---|---|
| Overview | ||
| Model Year | 2015 | 2017 |
| Warranty | 100,000km/3-years | 100,000km/3-years |
| Availability | Discontinued | Discontinued |
| Engine & Drivetrain | ||
| Engine Type | Inline-4 | Inline-4 |
| Displacement | 2488cc | 2198cc |
| Valvetrain | DOHC 16-valve | DOHC 16-valve |
| Aspiration | Variable Turbocharger (VGS) | Turbocharged |
| Fuel Type | Diesel | Diesel |
| Max Power | 129 PS @ 3200 rpm | 160 PS @ 3200 rpm |
| Max Torque | 356 Nm @ 1400-2000 rpm | 385 Nm @ 1600-2500 rpm |
| Transmission | 5-Speed M/T (Dash-Mounted) | 6-Speed M/T |
| Drivetrain | — | RWD |
| Body & Dimensions | ||
| Body Type | Van | Pick Up |
| Segment | M | Pick-Up |
| Doors | 4 | 4 |
| Seating Capacity | 3 | 2+3 |
| Length (mm) | 5080 | 5277 |
| Width (mm) | 1695 | 2163 |
| Height (mm) | 2285 | 1821 |
| Wheelbase (mm) | 2940 | 3220 |
| Curb Weight (kg) | 1825 | — |
| Fuel Tank (L) | 65 | 80 |
| Construction | — | Body On Frame |
| Chassis, Wheels & Brakes | ||
| Front Suspension | Torsion Bar with Front Stabilizer | Double Wishbone with Coil Spring |
| Rear Suspension | Leaf Spring | Leaf Spring |
| Front Wheels | 15 | 17" Alloys |
| Rear Wheels | 15 | 17" Alloys |
| Front Tires | 195/80R15LT | 265/65 R17 |
| Rear Tires | 195/80R15LT | 265/65 R17 |
| Rear Brakes | Drum | Drum |
| Steering Type | Power Steering | EPS |
| Steering Column | Manual Tilt | — |
| Tire Pressure Monitoring | No | No |
| Differential Lock | No | No |
| Front Brakes | — | Disc |
| Safety | ||
| Anti-lock Braking (ABS) | No | Yes |
| Electronic Brakeforce Distribution | No | Yes |
| Brake Assist | No | No |
| Parking Sensors | No | No |
| Stability Control | No | Yes |
| Traction Control | No | Yes |
| Vehicle Dynamic Control | No | No |
| Forward Collision Mitigation | No | No |
| Blind Spot Warning | No | No |
| Hill Start Assist | No | Yes |
| Hill Descent Control | No | Yes |
| Auto Stop/Start | No | No |
| Driver Airbag | Yes | Yes |
| Knee Airbag | No | Yes |
| Passenger Airbag | No | Yes |
| Front Curtain Airbags | No | No |
| Rear Curtain Airbags | No | No |
| Rear Side Airbags | No | No |
| Engine Immobilizer | No | No |
| Security Alarm | No | Yes |
| Door Locking | Standard | Central Locking |
| Comfort & Convenience | ||
| Air Conditioning | Manual, Dial Type | Single Zone Automatic |
| Rear A/C Vents | Yes | No |
| Seat Material | Fabric | Fabric |
| Parking Brake | Manual | Manual |
| Key Type | Manual | Keyless Entry |
| Push-Button Start | No | No |
| Cruise Control | No | Yes |
| Multi-Info Display | No | No |
| Paddle Shifters | No | No |
| Reverse Camera | No | No |
| Auto Headlights | No | No |
| Power Windows | Yes | Yes |
| Power Seats | No | Yes |
| Remote Trunk Release | No | No |
| Eco Mode | No | No |
| Antenna | yes | yes |
| Infotainment & Audio | ||
| Speakers | 2 | 6 |
| Touchscreen | No | No |
| Navigation | No | No |
| Bluetooth | No | No |
| Apple CarPlay | No | No |
| Android Auto | No | No |
| USB | No | Yes |
| AUX Input | No | Yes |
| AM/FM Radio | No | Yes |
| CD Player | No | Yes |
| DVD Player | No | No |
| MP3 Playback | No | Yes |
| iPod Support | No | Yes |
| SD Card Slot | No | No |
| Lighting | ||
| Headlights | Halogen | Halogen |
| Fog Lights | Yes | Yes |
| Daytime Running Lights | No | No |
Nissan NV350 Urvan Cargo (2015) vs Ford Ranger XLT 2.2L 4×2 MT (2017): which should you buy?
For Filipino buyers weighing a cargo van versus a pickup, the 2015 Nissan NV350 Urvan Cargo offers a lower price of ₱1,158,000 compared to the 2017 Ford Ranger XLT’s ₱1,219,000. The Urvan’s inline‑4 diesel engine delivers 129 PS at 3,200 rpm and 356 Nm torque between 1,400–2,000 rpm, while the Ranger’s 2.2L turbocharged diesel produces a higher 160 PS and 385 Nm torque from 1,600–2,500 rpm. In terms of drivetrain and body style, the Urvan is a front‑wheel‑drive van with 4 doors and seating for three, making it more suitable for light commercial use or small families needing cargo space. The Ranger is a rear‑wheel‑drive pickup with body‑on‑frame construction, 4 doors and seating for five (2+3), offering greater payload capacity and off‑road capability. Transmission choices differ: the Urvan uses a 5‑speed manual dash‑mounted gearbox, whereas the Ranger offers a 6‑speed manual. Practicality for daily commuting favors the Urvan’s lower power and simpler layout, while the Ranger’s higher torque and robust chassis suit tougher work conditions. Ultimately, choose the Urvan if budget and cargo flexibility are priorities; opt for the Ranger when you need more power, payload, and a vehicle capable of handling rougher terrain.
Frequently asked questions
Which model is cheaper?
The Nissan NV350 Urvan Cargo costs ₱1,158,000, while the Ford Ranger XLT 2.2L 4×2 MT is priced at ₱1,219,000.
Which has more power?
The Ford Ranger’s 2.2L turbocharged diesel produces 160 PS, higher than the Nissan Urvan’s 129 PS.
Which is better for daily commuting?
The Nissan Urvan’s lower power, front‑wheel drive and van body make it more economical for city use, whereas the Ranger’s higher torque and pickup chassis are better suited for heavier loads or off‑road use.
Which vehicle offers more seating capacity?
The Ford Ranger seats up to five people (2+3), while the Nissan Urvan seats only three.