Nissan NV350 Urvan Cargo (2015) vs Ford Ranger XLT 2.2L 4×2 MT (2017)

A full spec-by-spec comparison of Nissan NV350 Urvan Cargo (2015) vs Ford Ranger XLT 2.2L 4×2 MT (2017) — engine, performance, dimensions, features and price, with the differences highlighted to help you decide.

Specification Nissan NV350 Urvan Cargo (2015) Nissan ₱1,158,000 Ford Ranger XLT 2.2L 4×2 MT (2017) Ford ₱1,219,000
Overview
Model Year 2015 2017
Warranty 100,000km/3-years 100,000km/3-years
Availability Discontinued Discontinued
Engine & Drivetrain
Engine Type Inline-4 Inline-4
Displacement 2488cc 2198cc
Valvetrain DOHC 16-valve DOHC 16-valve
Aspiration Variable Turbocharger (VGS) Turbocharged
Fuel Type Diesel Diesel
Max Power 129 PS @ 3200 rpm 160 PS @ 3200 rpm
Max Torque 356 Nm @ 1400-2000 rpm 385 Nm @ 1600-2500 rpm
Transmission 5-Speed M/T (Dash-Mounted) 6-Speed M/T
Drivetrain RWD
Body & Dimensions
Body Type Van Pick Up
Segment M Pick-Up
Doors 4 4
Seating Capacity 3 2+3
Length (mm) 5080 5277
Width (mm) 1695 2163
Height (mm) 2285 1821
Wheelbase (mm) 2940 3220
Curb Weight (kg) 1825
Fuel Tank (L) 65 80
Construction Body On Frame
Chassis, Wheels & Brakes
Front Suspension Torsion Bar with Front Stabilizer Double Wishbone with Coil Spring
Rear Suspension Leaf Spring Leaf Spring
Front Wheels 15 17" Alloys
Rear Wheels 15 17" Alloys
Front Tires 195/80R15LT 265/65 R17
Rear Tires 195/80R15LT 265/65 R17
Rear Brakes Drum Drum
Steering Type Power Steering EPS
Steering Column Manual Tilt
Tire Pressure Monitoring No No
Differential Lock No No
Front Brakes Disc
Safety
Anti-lock Braking (ABS) No Yes
Electronic Brakeforce Distribution No Yes
Brake Assist No No
Parking Sensors No No
Stability Control No Yes
Traction Control No Yes
Vehicle Dynamic Control No No
Forward Collision Mitigation No No
Blind Spot Warning No No
Hill Start Assist No Yes
Hill Descent Control No Yes
Auto Stop/Start No No
Driver Airbag Yes Yes
Knee Airbag No Yes
Passenger Airbag No Yes
Front Curtain Airbags No No
Rear Curtain Airbags No No
Rear Side Airbags No No
Engine Immobilizer No No
Security Alarm No Yes
Door Locking Standard Central Locking
Comfort & Convenience
Air Conditioning Manual, Dial Type Single Zone Automatic
Rear A/C Vents Yes No
Seat Material Fabric Fabric
Parking Brake Manual Manual
Key Type Manual Keyless Entry
Push-Button Start No No
Cruise Control No Yes
Multi-Info Display No No
Paddle Shifters No No
Reverse Camera No No
Auto Headlights No No
Power Windows Yes Yes
Power Seats No Yes
Remote Trunk Release No No
Eco Mode No No
Antenna yes yes
Infotainment & Audio
Speakers 2 6
Touchscreen No No
Navigation No No
Bluetooth No No
Apple CarPlay No No
Android Auto No No
USB No Yes
AUX Input No Yes
AM/FM Radio No Yes
CD Player No Yes
DVD Player No No
MP3 Playback No Yes
iPod Support No Yes
SD Card Slot No No
Lighting
Headlights Halogen Halogen
Fog Lights Yes Yes
Daytime Running Lights No No
Keep comparing Add another model to this matchup — line up to four side by side.

Nissan NV350 Urvan Cargo (2015) vs Ford Ranger XLT 2.2L 4×2 MT (2017): which should you buy?

For Filipino buyers weighing a cargo van versus a pickup, the 2015 Nissan NV350 Urvan Cargo offers a lower price of ₱1,158,000 compared to the 2017 Ford Ranger XLT’s ₱1,219,000. The Urvan’s inline‑4 diesel engine delivers 129 PS at 3,200 rpm and 356 Nm torque between 1,400–2,000 rpm, while the Ranger’s 2.2L turbocharged diesel produces a higher 160 PS and 385 Nm torque from 1,600–2,500 rpm. In terms of drivetrain and body style, the Urvan is a front‑wheel‑drive van with 4 doors and seating for three, making it more suitable for light commercial use or small families needing cargo space. The Ranger is a rear‑wheel‑drive pickup with body‑on‑frame construction, 4 doors and seating for five (2+3), offering greater payload capacity and off‑road capability. Transmission choices differ: the Urvan uses a 5‑speed manual dash‑mounted gearbox, whereas the Ranger offers a 6‑speed manual. Practicality for daily commuting favors the Urvan’s lower power and simpler layout, while the Ranger’s higher torque and robust chassis suit tougher work conditions. Ultimately, choose the Urvan if budget and cargo flexibility are priorities; opt for the Ranger when you need more power, payload, and a vehicle capable of handling rougher terrain.

Frequently asked questions

Which model is cheaper?

The Nissan NV350 Urvan Cargo costs ₱1,158,000, while the Ford Ranger XLT 2.2L 4×2 MT is priced at ₱1,219,000.

Which has more power?

The Ford Ranger’s 2.2L turbocharged diesel produces 160 PS, higher than the Nissan Urvan’s 129 PS.

Which is better for daily commuting?

The Nissan Urvan’s lower power, front‑wheel drive and van body make it more economical for city use, whereas the Ranger’s higher torque and pickup chassis are better suited for heavier loads or off‑road use.

Which vehicle offers more seating capacity?

The Ford Ranger seats up to five people (2+3), while the Nissan Urvan seats only three.