Nissan NV350 Urvan Cargo (2015) vs Honda BR-V 1.5 V CVT Navi (2017)
A full spec-by-spec comparison of Nissan NV350 Urvan Cargo (2015) vs Honda BR-V 1.5 V CVT Navi (2017) — engine, performance, dimensions, features and price, with the differences highlighted to help you decide.
| Specification | Nissan NV350 Urvan Cargo (2015) Nissan ₱1,158,000 | Honda BR-V 1.5 V CVT Navi (2017) Honda ₱1,149,000 |
|---|---|---|
| Overview | ||
| Model Year | 2015 | 2017 |
| Warranty | 100,000km/3-years | 100,000 km/3-years |
| Availability | Discontinued | Current |
| Engine & Drivetrain | ||
| Engine Type | Inline-4 | Inline-4 |
| Displacement | 2488cc | 1497cc |
| Valvetrain | DOHC 16-valve | SOHC 16-valve |
| Aspiration | Variable Turbocharger (VGS) | Naturally Aspirated |
| Fuel Type | Diesel | Gas |
| Max Power | 129 PS @ 3200 rpm | 120 PS @ 6600 rpm |
| Max Torque | 356 Nm @ 1400-2000 rpm | 145 Nm @ 4600 rpm |
| Transmission | 5-Speed M/T (Dash-Mounted) | CVT |
| Drivetrain | — | FWD |
| Body & Dimensions | ||
| Body Type | Van | Crossover |
| Segment | M | J |
| Doors | 4 | 5 |
| Seating Capacity | 3 | 2+3+2 |
| Length (mm) | 5080 | 4456 |
| Width (mm) | 1695 | 1735 |
| Height (mm) | 2285 | 1665 |
| Wheelbase (mm) | 2940 | 2662 |
| Curb Weight (kg) | 1825 | 1250 |
| Fuel Tank (L) | 65 | 42 |
| Construction | — | Unibody |
| Chassis, Wheels & Brakes | ||
| Front Suspension | Torsion Bar with Front Stabilizer | MacPherson, Coil Spring w/ Stabilizer |
| Rear Suspension | Leaf Spring | Torsion Beam w/ Coil Spring |
| Front Wheels | 15 | 16 Alloy |
| Rear Wheels | 15 | 16 Alloy |
| Front Tires | 195/80R15LT | 195/60 R16 |
| Rear Tires | 195/80R15LT | 195/60 R16 |
| Rear Brakes | Drum | Disc |
| Steering Type | Power Steering | EPS |
| Steering Column | Manual Tilt | tilt |
| Tire Pressure Monitoring | No | No |
| Differential Lock | No | No |
| Front Brakes | — | Disc |
| Safety | ||
| Anti-lock Braking (ABS) | No | Yes |
| Electronic Brakeforce Distribution | No | Yes |
| Brake Assist | No | Yes |
| Parking Sensors | No | No |
| Stability Control | No | Yes |
| Traction Control | No | Yes |
| Vehicle Dynamic Control | No | No |
| Forward Collision Mitigation | No | No |
| Blind Spot Warning | No | No |
| Hill Start Assist | No | Yes |
| Hill Descent Control | No | No |
| Auto Stop/Start | No | No |
| Driver Airbag | Yes | Yes |
| Knee Airbag | No | No |
| Passenger Airbag | No | Yes |
| Front Curtain Airbags | No | No |
| Rear Curtain Airbags | No | No |
| Rear Side Airbags | No | No |
| Engine Immobilizer | No | Yes |
| Security Alarm | No | Yes |
| Door Locking | Standard | Central Locking |
| Comfort & Convenience | ||
| Air Conditioning | Manual, Dial Type | Automatic Air Conditioning |
| Rear A/C Vents | Yes | Yes |
| Seat Material | Fabric | Leather |
| Parking Brake | Manual | Manual |
| Key Type | Manual | Smart Entry |
| Push-Button Start | No | Yes |
| Cruise Control | No | No |
| Multi-Info Display | No | Yes |
| Paddle Shifters | No | Yes |
| Reverse Camera | No | No |
| Auto Headlights | No | No |
| Power Windows | Yes | Yes |
| Power Seats | No | No |
| Remote Trunk Release | No | No |
| Eco Mode | No | No |
| Antenna | yes | yes |
| Infotainment & Audio | ||
| Speakers | 2 | 4 |
| Touchscreen | No | Yes |
| Navigation | No | Yes |
| Bluetooth | No | Yes |
| Apple CarPlay | No | No |
| Android Auto | No | No |
| USB | No | Yes |
| AUX Input | No | Yes |
| AM/FM Radio | No | Yes |
| CD Player | No | No |
| DVD Player | No | No |
| MP3 Playback | No | Yes |
| iPod Support | No | Yes |
| SD Card Slot | No | No |
| Lighting | ||
| Headlights | Halogen | Halogen |
| Fog Lights | Yes | Yes |
| Daytime Running Lights | No | Yes |
Nissan NV350 Urvan Cargo (2015) vs Honda BR-V 1.5 V CVT Navi (2017): which should you buy?
For a Filipino buyer who needs a work‑horse cargo van, the 2015 Nissan NV350 Urvan Cargo is the clear choice. It offers a far larger interior (5.08 m length, 2.285 m height) and a dedicated cargo layout with only three seats, making it far more practical for transporting goods or equipment. Its 2.5‑L turbo‑charged diesel delivers 129 PS and a massive 356 Nm of torque at low revs, giving it superior pulling power and fuel efficiency for heavy loads compared to the 1.5‑L naturally aspirated gasoline engine in the Honda BR‑V, which only produces 120 PS and 145 Nm. Although the Urvan is discontinued, its price of ₱1,158,000 is only slightly higher than the ₱1,149,000 Honda, and both carry the same 100,000 km/3‑year warranty. The Honda BR‑V, with its five‑door crossover body, unibody construction and CVT, is better suited for families or city commuters who need seating for up to seven passengers and a more car‑like driving experience, but it lacks the cargo capacity and low‑end torque essential for commercial use. Choose the Nissan if cargo volume, torque and durability are priorities; opt for the Honda if you need a family‑oriented, fuel‑efficient crossover for daily commuting.
Frequently asked questions
Which vehicle is cheaper?
The Honda BR‑V is priced at ₱1,149,000, which is ₱9,000 less than the Nissan NV350 Urvan Cargo at ₱1,158,000.
Which model has more power and torque?
The Nissan NV350 Urvan Cargo produces 129 PS and 356 Nm of torque, whereas the Honda BR‑V delivers 120 PS and 145 Nm.
Which vehicle is better for cargo or commercial use?
The Nissan NV350 Urvan Cargo, with its larger dimensions, three‑seat cargo layout and high low‑end torque, is far more suitable for transporting goods than the passenger‑focused Honda BR‑V.
Is the Honda BR‑V suitable for daily commuting?
Yes, the Honda BR‑V’s five‑door crossover body, unibody construction and CVT transmission make it a comfortable, fuel‑efficient option for everyday city driving and family use.