Nissan NV350 Urvan Cargo (2015) vs Honda City Hatchback 1.5 RS CVT (2024)
A full spec-by-spec comparison of Nissan NV350 Urvan Cargo (2015) vs Honda City Hatchback 1.5 RS CVT (2024) — engine, performance, dimensions, features and price, with the differences highlighted to help you decide.
| Specification | Nissan NV350 Urvan Cargo (2015) Nissan ₱1,158,000 | Honda City Hatchback 1.5 RS CVT (2024) Honda ₱1,219,000 |
|---|---|---|
| Overview | ||
| Model Year | 2015 | 2024 |
| Warranty | 100,000km/3-years | 3-years/100,000km |
| Availability | Discontinued | Current |
| Engine & Drivetrain | ||
| Engine Type | Inline-4 | Inline-4 |
| Displacement | 2488cc | 1498cc |
| Valvetrain | DOHC 16-valve | DOHC 16-valve |
| Aspiration | Variable Turbocharger (VGS) | Naturally Aspirated |
| Fuel Type | Diesel | Gasoline |
| Max Power | 129 PS @ 3200 rpm | 121 PS @ 6600 rpm |
| Max Torque | 356 Nm @ 1400-2000 rpm | 145 Nm @ 4300 rpm |
| Transmission | 5-Speed M/T (Dash-Mounted) | CVT |
| Drivetrain | — | FWD |
| Body & Dimensions | ||
| Body Type | Van | Hatchback |
| Segment | M | Hatchback |
| Doors | 4 | 5 |
| Seating Capacity | 3 | 2+3 |
| Length (mm) | 5080 | 4369 |
| Width (mm) | 1695 | 1748 |
| Height (mm) | 2285 | 1488 |
| Wheelbase (mm) | 2940 | 2600 |
| Curb Weight (kg) | 1825 | 1143 |
| Fuel Tank (L) | 65 | 40 |
| Construction | — | Unibody |
| Exterior Colors | — | Sonic Grey Pearl, Meteoroid Gray Metallic, Brilliant Sporty Blue Metallic, Platinum White Pearl, Ignite Red Metallic |
| Chassis, Wheels & Brakes | ||
| Front Suspension | Torsion Bar with Front Stabilizer | MacPherson Strut w/ Coil Spring |
| Rear Suspension | Leaf Spring | Torsion Beam |
| Front Wheels | 15 | 16 |
| Rear Wheels | 15 | 16 |
| Front Tires | 195/80R15LT | 185/55/R16 |
| Rear Tires | 195/80R15LT | 185/55/R16 |
| Rear Brakes | Drum | Drum |
| Steering Type | Power Steering | EPS |
| Steering Column | Manual Tilt | Tilt + Telescopic |
| Tire Pressure Monitoring | No | Yes |
| Differential Lock | No | No |
| Front Brakes | — | Disc |
| Safety | ||
| Anti-lock Braking (ABS) | No | Yes |
| Electronic Brakeforce Distribution | No | Yes |
| Brake Assist | No | Yes |
| Parking Sensors | No | Yes |
| Stability Control | No | Yes |
| Traction Control | No | Yes |
| Vehicle Dynamic Control | No | No |
| Forward Collision Mitigation | No | No |
| Blind Spot Warning | No | No |
| Hill Start Assist | No | Yes |
| Hill Descent Control | No | No |
| Auto Stop/Start | No | No |
| Driver Airbag | Yes | Yes |
| Knee Airbag | No | No |
| Passenger Airbag | No | Yes |
| Front Curtain Airbags | No | Yes |
| Rear Curtain Airbags | No | Yes |
| Rear Side Airbags | No | Yes |
| Engine Immobilizer | No | Yes |
| Security Alarm | No | Yes |
| Door Locking | Standard | Central Locking |
| Comfort & Convenience | ||
| Air Conditioning | Manual, Dial Type | Automatic Climate Control |
| Rear A/C Vents | Yes | No |
| Seat Material | Fabric | Leather |
| Parking Brake | Manual | Manual |
| Key Type | Manual | Keyless Entry |
| Push-Button Start | No | No |
| Cruise Control | No | Yes |
| Multi-Info Display | No | Yes |
| Paddle Shifters | No | Yes |
| Reverse Camera | No | Yes |
| Auto Headlights | No | No |
| Power Windows | Yes | Yes |
| Power Seats | No | No |
| Remote Trunk Release | No | No |
| Eco Mode | No | No |
| Antenna | yes | yes |
| Infotainment & Audio | ||
| Speakers | 2 | 8 |
| Touchscreen | No | Yes |
| Navigation | No | No |
| Bluetooth | No | Yes |
| Apple CarPlay | No | Yes |
| Android Auto | No | No |
| USB | No | Yes |
| AUX Input | No | No |
| AM/FM Radio | No | Yes |
| CD Player | No | No |
| DVD Player | No | No |
| MP3 Playback | No | No |
| iPod Support | No | No |
| SD Card Slot | No | No |
| Lighting | ||
| Headlights | Halogen | LED |
| Fog Lights | Yes | Yes |
| Daytime Running Lights | No | Yes |
Nissan NV350 Urvan Cargo (2015) vs Honda City Hatchback 1.5 RS CVT (2024): which should you buy?
For a Filipino buyer whose priority is cargo capacity and commercial use, the 2015 Nissan NV350 Urvan Cargo is the clear choice despite being discontinued. It offers a massive interior (5.08 m long, 1.695 m wide, 2.285 m high) and a robust diesel engine delivering 129 PS and 356 Nm of torque, ideal for hauling heavy loads. Its price is slightly lower at ₱1,158,000, and the 5‑speed manual is simple and durable for work‑horse duties. Conversely, the 2024 Honda City Hatchback 1.5 RS CVT targets personal daily driving with a modern unibody design, five doors, and a fuel‑efficient 1.5‑L gasoline engine producing 121 PS and 145 Nm. It costs ₱1,219,000, is currently available, and comes with a CVT for smoother city rides. However, its seating is limited to five passengers and offers no cargo volume comparable to the Urvan. In summary, choose the Nissan NV350 if you need a practical, high‑torque van for business or family cargo at a lower price. Opt for the Honda City if you prefer a compact, fuel‑efficient hatchback for everyday commuting and comfort, and are willing to pay a premium for newer technology and warranty coverage.
Frequently asked questions
Which vehicle is cheaper?
The Nissan NV350 Urvan Cargo is priced at ₱1,158,000, which is ₱61,000 less than the Honda City Hatchback priced at ₱1,219,000.
Which model has more power and torque?
The Nissan NV350 delivers 129 PS and 356 Nm of torque, surpassing the Honda City’s 121 PS and 145 Nm.
Is the Honda City better for daily commuting?
Yes, the City’s compact hatchback body, CVT transmission, and gasoline engine make it more suited for city driving and fuel efficiency.
Can the Nissan NV350 be used for passenger transport?
The NV350 is a cargo‑focused van with only 3 seats and a large interior, so it is better for cargo than regular passenger transport.