Nissan NV350 Urvan Cargo (2015) vs Suzuki Fronx GL 4AT (2025)

A full spec-by-spec comparison of Nissan NV350 Urvan Cargo (2015) vs Suzuki Fronx GL 4AT (2025) — engine, performance, dimensions, features and price, with the differences highlighted to help you decide.

Specification Nissan NV350 Urvan Cargo (2015) Nissan ₱1,158,000 Suzuki Fronx GL 4AT (2025) Suzuki ₱1,059,000
Overview
Model Year 2015 2025
Warranty 100,000km/3-years 3-years/100,000 km
Availability Discontinued Current
Engine & Drivetrain
Engine Type Inline-4 Inline-4
Displacement 2488cc 1462cc
Valvetrain DOHC 16-valve 16-valve
Aspiration Variable Turbocharger (VGS) Naturally Aspirated
Fuel Type Diesel Gasoline
Max Power 129 PS @ 3200 rpm 104 PS
Max Torque 356 Nm @ 1400-2000 rpm 138 Nm
Transmission 5-Speed M/T (Dash-Mounted) Automatic 4-Speed
Drivetrain FWD
Body & Dimensions
Body Type Van Small Crossover SUV
Segment M Crossover
Doors 4 5
Seating Capacity 3 2+3
Length (mm) 5080 3995
Width (mm) 1695 1765
Height (mm) 2285 1550
Wheelbase (mm) 2940 2520
Curb Weight (kg) 1825 1010
Fuel Tank (L) 65 37
Construction Unibody
Exterior Colors Silky Silver Metallic, Celestial Blue Pearl Metallic, Arctic White, Bluish Black, Granite Gray Metallic
Chassis, Wheels & Brakes
Front Suspension Torsion Bar with Front Stabilizer MacPherson Strut w/Coil Spring
Rear Suspension Leaf Spring Torsion beam w/Coil Spring
Front Wheels 15 16
Rear Wheels 15 16
Front Tires 195/80R15LT 195/60R16
Rear Tires 195/80R15LT 195/60R16
Rear Brakes Drum Drum
Steering Type Power Steering Hydraulic
Steering Column Manual Tilt Tilt
Tire Pressure Monitoring No No
Differential Lock No No
Front Brakes Disc
Safety
Anti-lock Braking (ABS) No Yes
Electronic Brakeforce Distribution No Yes
Brake Assist No No
Parking Sensors No No
Stability Control No No
Traction Control No No
Vehicle Dynamic Control No No
Forward Collision Mitigation No No
Blind Spot Warning No No
Hill Start Assist No No
Hill Descent Control No No
Auto Stop/Start No No
Driver Airbag Yes No
Knee Airbag No No
Passenger Airbag No No
Front Curtain Airbags No No
Rear Curtain Airbags No No
Rear Side Airbags No No
Engine Immobilizer No Yes
Security Alarm No Yes
Door Locking Standard Central Locking
Comfort & Convenience
Air Conditioning Manual, Dial Type Automatic Climate Control
Rear A/C Vents Yes No
Seat Material Fabric Fabric
Parking Brake Manual Mechanical
Key Type Manual Keyless Entry
Push-Button Start No No
Cruise Control No No
Multi-Info Display No Yes
Paddle Shifters No No
Reverse Camera No No
Auto Headlights No No
Power Windows Yes Yes
Power Seats No No
Remote Trunk Release No No
Eco Mode No No
Antenna yes no
Infotainment & Audio
Speakers 2 4
Touchscreen No Yes
Navigation No No
Bluetooth No Yes
Apple CarPlay No Yes
Android Auto No No
USB No No
AUX Input No No
AM/FM Radio No Yes
CD Player No No
DVD Player No No
MP3 Playback No No
iPod Support No No
SD Card Slot No No
Lighting
Headlights Halogen LED
Fog Lights Yes No
Daytime Running Lights No Yes
Keep comparing Add another model to this matchup — line up to four side by side.

Nissan NV350 Urvan Cargo (2015) vs Suzuki Fronx GL 4AT (2025): which should you buy?

For a Filipino buyer whose primary need is cargo capacity and heavy‑duty hauling, the 2015 Nissan NV350 Urvan Cargo is the clear choice. It offers a massive 5.08‑meter length, 2.285‑meter height and a diesel engine that delivers 129 PS and a robust 356 Nm of torque at low revs, making it far more capable of moving heavy loads than the 2025 Suzuki Fronx GL, which is a small crossover with only 104 PS and 138 Nm. The Urvan’s 3‑seat layout maximises cargo space, while the Fronx’s 5‑door, 2+3 seating is geared toward passengers. Price‑wise the Urvan is slightly higher at ₱1,158,000 versus ₱1,059,000 for the Fronx, but the extra cost buys a commercial‑grade vehicle with a 100,000 km/3‑year warranty and a proven diesel powertrain suited for business use. The Fronx, with its modern unibody construction, automatic 4‑speed transmission and a range of exterior colors, is better suited for everyday family commuting and city driving, offering better fuel type (gasoline) and a more compact footprint. In summary, choose the Nissan NV350 Urvan if you need a durable, high‑torque work van for cargo and business operations; opt for the Suzuki Fronx GL if you prefer a newer, stylish, passenger‑focused crossover for personal use.

Frequently asked questions

Which vehicle is cheaper?

The Suzuki Fronx GL 2025 is cheaper at ₱1,059,000 compared to the Nissan NV350 Urvan Cargo at ₱1,158,000.

Which one has more power and torque?

The Nissan NV350 Urvan Cargo produces 129 PS and 356 Nm of torque, whereas the Suzuki Fronx GL offers 104 PS and 138 Nm.

Which model is better for cargo hauling?

The Nissan NV350 Urvan Cargo, with its 5.08 m length, 2.285 m height and 3‑seat configuration, is designed for cargo, making it far more suitable for hauling than the passenger‑oriented Suzuki Fronx.

Is the Suzuki Fronx more suitable for daily commuting?

Yes, the Fronx is a small crossover SUV with a 5‑door layout, gasoline engine and modern styling, making it better suited for everyday family or city commuting than the commercial‑grade Urvan.