Nissan NV350 Urvan Cargo (2015) vs Suzuki Fronx GL 4AT (2025)
A full spec-by-spec comparison of Nissan NV350 Urvan Cargo (2015) vs Suzuki Fronx GL 4AT (2025) — engine, performance, dimensions, features and price, with the differences highlighted to help you decide.
| Specification | Nissan NV350 Urvan Cargo (2015) Nissan ₱1,158,000 | Suzuki Fronx GL 4AT (2025) Suzuki ₱1,059,000 |
|---|---|---|
| Overview | ||
| Model Year | 2015 | 2025 |
| Warranty | 100,000km/3-years | 3-years/100,000 km |
| Availability | Discontinued | Current |
| Engine & Drivetrain | ||
| Engine Type | Inline-4 | Inline-4 |
| Displacement | 2488cc | 1462cc |
| Valvetrain | DOHC 16-valve | 16-valve |
| Aspiration | Variable Turbocharger (VGS) | Naturally Aspirated |
| Fuel Type | Diesel | Gasoline |
| Max Power | 129 PS @ 3200 rpm | 104 PS |
| Max Torque | 356 Nm @ 1400-2000 rpm | 138 Nm |
| Transmission | 5-Speed M/T (Dash-Mounted) | Automatic 4-Speed |
| Drivetrain | — | FWD |
| Body & Dimensions | ||
| Body Type | Van | Small Crossover SUV |
| Segment | M | Crossover |
| Doors | 4 | 5 |
| Seating Capacity | 3 | 2+3 |
| Length (mm) | 5080 | 3995 |
| Width (mm) | 1695 | 1765 |
| Height (mm) | 2285 | 1550 |
| Wheelbase (mm) | 2940 | 2520 |
| Curb Weight (kg) | 1825 | 1010 |
| Fuel Tank (L) | 65 | 37 |
| Construction | — | Unibody |
| Exterior Colors | — | Silky Silver Metallic, Celestial Blue Pearl Metallic, Arctic White, Bluish Black, Granite Gray Metallic |
| Chassis, Wheels & Brakes | ||
| Front Suspension | Torsion Bar with Front Stabilizer | MacPherson Strut w/Coil Spring |
| Rear Suspension | Leaf Spring | Torsion beam w/Coil Spring |
| Front Wheels | 15 | 16 |
| Rear Wheels | 15 | 16 |
| Front Tires | 195/80R15LT | 195/60R16 |
| Rear Tires | 195/80R15LT | 195/60R16 |
| Rear Brakes | Drum | Drum |
| Steering Type | Power Steering | Hydraulic |
| Steering Column | Manual Tilt | Tilt |
| Tire Pressure Monitoring | No | No |
| Differential Lock | No | No |
| Front Brakes | — | Disc |
| Safety | ||
| Anti-lock Braking (ABS) | No | Yes |
| Electronic Brakeforce Distribution | No | Yes |
| Brake Assist | No | No |
| Parking Sensors | No | No |
| Stability Control | No | No |
| Traction Control | No | No |
| Vehicle Dynamic Control | No | No |
| Forward Collision Mitigation | No | No |
| Blind Spot Warning | No | No |
| Hill Start Assist | No | No |
| Hill Descent Control | No | No |
| Auto Stop/Start | No | No |
| Driver Airbag | Yes | No |
| Knee Airbag | No | No |
| Passenger Airbag | No | No |
| Front Curtain Airbags | No | No |
| Rear Curtain Airbags | No | No |
| Rear Side Airbags | No | No |
| Engine Immobilizer | No | Yes |
| Security Alarm | No | Yes |
| Door Locking | Standard | Central Locking |
| Comfort & Convenience | ||
| Air Conditioning | Manual, Dial Type | Automatic Climate Control |
| Rear A/C Vents | Yes | No |
| Seat Material | Fabric | Fabric |
| Parking Brake | Manual | Mechanical |
| Key Type | Manual | Keyless Entry |
| Push-Button Start | No | No |
| Cruise Control | No | No |
| Multi-Info Display | No | Yes |
| Paddle Shifters | No | No |
| Reverse Camera | No | No |
| Auto Headlights | No | No |
| Power Windows | Yes | Yes |
| Power Seats | No | No |
| Remote Trunk Release | No | No |
| Eco Mode | No | No |
| Antenna | yes | no |
| Infotainment & Audio | ||
| Speakers | 2 | 4 |
| Touchscreen | No | Yes |
| Navigation | No | No |
| Bluetooth | No | Yes |
| Apple CarPlay | No | Yes |
| Android Auto | No | No |
| USB | No | No |
| AUX Input | No | No |
| AM/FM Radio | No | Yes |
| CD Player | No | No |
| DVD Player | No | No |
| MP3 Playback | No | No |
| iPod Support | No | No |
| SD Card Slot | No | No |
| Lighting | ||
| Headlights | Halogen | LED |
| Fog Lights | Yes | No |
| Daytime Running Lights | No | Yes |
Nissan NV350 Urvan Cargo (2015) vs Suzuki Fronx GL 4AT (2025): which should you buy?
For a Filipino buyer whose primary need is cargo capacity and heavy‑duty hauling, the 2015 Nissan NV350 Urvan Cargo is the clear choice. It offers a massive 5.08‑meter length, 2.285‑meter height and a diesel engine that delivers 129 PS and a robust 356 Nm of torque at low revs, making it far more capable of moving heavy loads than the 2025 Suzuki Fronx GL, which is a small crossover with only 104 PS and 138 Nm. The Urvan’s 3‑seat layout maximises cargo space, while the Fronx’s 5‑door, 2+3 seating is geared toward passengers. Price‑wise the Urvan is slightly higher at ₱1,158,000 versus ₱1,059,000 for the Fronx, but the extra cost buys a commercial‑grade vehicle with a 100,000 km/3‑year warranty and a proven diesel powertrain suited for business use. The Fronx, with its modern unibody construction, automatic 4‑speed transmission and a range of exterior colors, is better suited for everyday family commuting and city driving, offering better fuel type (gasoline) and a more compact footprint. In summary, choose the Nissan NV350 Urvan if you need a durable, high‑torque work van for cargo and business operations; opt for the Suzuki Fronx GL if you prefer a newer, stylish, passenger‑focused crossover for personal use.
Frequently asked questions
Which vehicle is cheaper?
The Suzuki Fronx GL 2025 is cheaper at ₱1,059,000 compared to the Nissan NV350 Urvan Cargo at ₱1,158,000.
Which one has more power and torque?
The Nissan NV350 Urvan Cargo produces 129 PS and 356 Nm of torque, whereas the Suzuki Fronx GL offers 104 PS and 138 Nm.
Which model is better for cargo hauling?
The Nissan NV350 Urvan Cargo, with its 5.08 m length, 2.285 m height and 3‑seat configuration, is designed for cargo, making it far more suitable for hauling than the passenger‑oriented Suzuki Fronx.
Is the Suzuki Fronx more suitable for daily commuting?
Yes, the Fronx is a small crossover SUV with a 5‑door layout, gasoline engine and modern styling, making it better suited for everyday family or city commuting than the commercial‑grade Urvan.