Nissan NV350 Urvan Cargo (2015) vs Suzuki Jimny 1.5 GL M/T (2019)
A full spec-by-spec comparison of Nissan NV350 Urvan Cargo (2015) vs Suzuki Jimny 1.5 GL M/T (2019) — engine, performance, dimensions, features and price, with the differences highlighted to help you decide.
| Specification | Nissan NV350 Urvan Cargo (2015) Nissan ₱1,158,000 | Suzuki Jimny 1.5 GL M/T (2019) Suzuki ₱1,258,000 |
|---|---|---|
| Overview | ||
| Model Year | 2015 | 2019 |
| Warranty | 100,000km/3-years | 3-years/100,000km |
| Availability | Discontinued | Current |
| Engine & Drivetrain | ||
| Engine Type | Inline-4 | Inline-4 |
| Displacement | 2488cc | 1462cc |
| Valvetrain | DOHC 16-valve | DOHC 16-valve |
| Aspiration | Variable Turbocharger (VGS) | Naturally Aspirated |
| Fuel Type | Diesel | Gasoline |
| Max Power | 129 PS @ 3200 rpm | 102 PS @ 6000 rpm |
| Max Torque | 356 Nm @ 1400-2000 rpm | 130 Nm @ 4000 rpm |
| Transmission | 5-Speed M/T (Dash-Mounted) | 5-speed M/T |
| Compression Ratio | — | 10:1 |
| Drivetrain | — | 4WD |
| Body & Dimensions | ||
| Body Type | Van | Small Crossover SUV |
| Segment | M | SUV |
| Doors | 4 | 3 |
| Seating Capacity | 3 | 2+2 |
| Length (mm) | 5080 | 3650 |
| Width (mm) | 1695 | 1645 |
| Height (mm) | 2285 | 1725 |
| Wheelbase (mm) | 2940 | 2250 |
| Curb Weight (kg) | 1825 | 1110 |
| Fuel Tank (L) | 65 | 40 |
| Construction | — | Body-on-frame |
| Exterior Colors | — | Jungle Green, Medium Gray, Superior White, Kinetic Yellow + Bluish Black Pearl, Brisk Blue Metallic + Bluish Black Pearl, and Chiffon Ivory Metallic + Bluish Black Pearl |
| Chassis, Wheels & Brakes | ||
| Front Suspension | Torsion Bar with Front Stabilizer | 3-Link Rigid Axle, Coil Spring |
| Rear Suspension | Leaf Spring | 3-Link Rigid Axle, Coil Spring |
| Front Wheels | 15 | 15 alloy |
| Rear Wheels | 15 | 15 alloy |
| Front Tires | 195/80R15LT | 195/80/R15 |
| Rear Tires | 195/80R15LT | 195/80/R15 |
| Rear Brakes | Drum | Drum |
| Steering Type | Power Steering | EPS |
| Steering Column | Manual Tilt | Tilt |
| Tire Pressure Monitoring | No | No |
| Differential Lock | No | No |
| Front Brakes | — | Disc |
| Safety | ||
| Anti-lock Braking (ABS) | No | Yes |
| Electronic Brakeforce Distribution | No | Yes |
| Brake Assist | No | No |
| Parking Sensors | No | No |
| Stability Control | No | No |
| Traction Control | No | No |
| Vehicle Dynamic Control | No | No |
| Forward Collision Mitigation | No | No |
| Blind Spot Warning | No | No |
| Hill Start Assist | No | Yes |
| Hill Descent Control | No | Yes |
| Auto Stop/Start | No | No |
| Driver Airbag | Yes | No |
| Knee Airbag | No | No |
| Passenger Airbag | No | No |
| Front Curtain Airbags | No | No |
| Rear Curtain Airbags | No | No |
| Rear Side Airbags | No | No |
| Engine Immobilizer | No | Yes |
| Security Alarm | No | Yes |
| Door Locking | Standard | Central Locking |
| Comfort & Convenience | ||
| Air Conditioning | Manual, Dial Type | Manual Air Conditioning |
| Rear A/C Vents | Yes | No |
| Seat Material | Fabric | Fabric |
| Parking Brake | Manual | Manual |
| Key Type | Manual | Keyless Entry |
| Push-Button Start | No | No |
| Cruise Control | No | No |
| Multi-Info Display | No | Yes |
| Paddle Shifters | No | No |
| Reverse Camera | No | No |
| Auto Headlights | No | No |
| Power Windows | Yes | Yes |
| Power Seats | No | No |
| Remote Trunk Release | No | No |
| Eco Mode | No | No |
| Antenna | yes | yes |
| Infotainment & Audio | ||
| Speakers | 2 | 2 |
| Touchscreen | No | Yes |
| Navigation | No | Yes |
| Bluetooth | No | Yes |
| Apple CarPlay | No | No |
| Android Auto | No | No |
| USB | No | Yes |
| AUX Input | No | No |
| AM/FM Radio | No | Yes |
| CD Player | No | No |
| DVD Player | No | No |
| MP3 Playback | No | Yes |
| iPod Support | No | Yes |
| SD Card Slot | No | No |
| Lighting | ||
| Headlights | Halogen | Halogen |
| Fog Lights | Yes | Yes |
| Daytime Running Lights | No | No |
Nissan NV350 Urvan Cargo (2015) vs Suzuki Jimny 1.5 GL M/T (2019): which should you buy?
For a Filipino buyer whose primary need is cargo capacity and commercial use, the 2015 Nissan NV350 Urvan Cargo is the clear choice. It offers a massive interior volume with a length of 5,080 mm, height of 2,285 mm and a simple three‑seat layout that maximises load space, making it far more practical for transporting goods than the compact Suzuki Jimny. The Urvan also delivers substantially higher torque (356 Nm at 1,400‑2,000 rpm) and a larger diesel engine (2.5 L) that is better suited for heavy loads and fuel‑efficient cruising, while the Jimny’s 1.5 L gasoline engine produces only 130 Nm. Price‑wise the Urvan is slightly cheaper at ₱1,158,000 versus ₱1,258,000 for the Jimny, giving a better value for a work‑oriented vehicle. However, the Jimny shines in urban maneuverability, off‑road capability with its 4WD system, and a modern body‑on‑frame SUV feel, ideal for families or adventure‑seeking drivers who need a compact, rugged ride rather than cargo space. Its three‑door layout and higher power output (102 PS) make it more lively on city streets. In summary, choose the Nissan NV350 Urvan Cargo if you need a durable, torque‑rich van for business or cargo hauling; opt for the Suzuki Jimny if you prefer a smaller, off‑road‑capable SUV for personal use and daily commuting.
Frequently asked questions
Which vehicle is cheaper?
The Nissan NV350 Urvan Cargo is priced at ₱1,158,000, which is ₱100,000 less than the Suzuki Jimny priced at ₱1,258,000.
Which model offers more power and torque?
The Urvan’s 2.5 L diesel engine produces 129 PS and 356 Nm of torque, while the Jimny’s 1.5 L gasoline engine makes 102 PS and 130 Nm, so the Urvan is significantly stronger, especially in low‑rpm torque.
What are the key practicality differences?
The Urvan is a full‑size van with a 5,080 mm length and three seats, providing ample cargo space, whereas the Jimny is a compact 3‑door SUV designed for passenger use and off‑road capability, offering far less load capacity.
Is either vehicle better for daily commuting?
The Suzuki Jimny, with its smaller size, 4WD system and higher-revving gasoline engine, is more suited for daily city driving and occasional off‑road trips, while the Urvan is geared toward commercial hauling rather than everyday commuting.