Nissan NV350 Urvan Cargo (2015) vs Toyota Hiace Cargo (2020)
A full spec-by-spec comparison of Nissan NV350 Urvan Cargo (2015) vs Toyota Hiace Cargo (2020) — engine, performance, dimensions, features and price, with the differences highlighted to help you decide.
| Specification | Nissan NV350 Urvan Cargo (2015) Nissan ₱1,158,000 | Toyota Hiace Cargo (2020) Toyota ₱1,219,000 |
|---|---|---|
| Overview | ||
| Model Year | 2015 | 2020 |
| Warranty | 100,000km/3-years | 5 years |
| Availability | Discontinued | Current |
| Engine & Drivetrain | ||
| Engine Type | Inline-4 | Inline-4 |
| Displacement | 2488cc | 2982cc |
| Valvetrain | DOHC 16-valve | DOHC 16-Valve |
| Aspiration | Variable Turbocharger (VGS) | Turbocharged |
| Fuel Type | Diesel | Diesel |
| Max Power | 129 PS @ 3200 rpm | 136 PS |
| Max Torque | 356 Nm @ 1400-2000 rpm | 300 Nm |
| Transmission | 5-Speed M/T (Dash-Mounted) | Manual 5-Speed |
| Drivetrain | — | RWD |
| Body & Dimensions | ||
| Body Type | Van | Van |
| Segment | M | Van |
| Doors | 4 | 4 |
| Seating Capacity | 3 | 3 |
| Length (mm) | 5080 | 4695 |
| Width (mm) | 1695 | 1695 |
| Height (mm) | 2285 | 1980 |
| Wheelbase (mm) | 2940 | 2570 |
| Curb Weight (kg) | 1825 | 2600 |
| Fuel Tank (L) | 65 | 70 |
| Construction | — | Body-on-frame |
| Exterior Colors | — | White, Silver Mica Metallic |
| Chassis, Wheels & Brakes | ||
| Front Suspension | Torsion Bar with Front Stabilizer | Double Wishbone w/ Coil Spring |
| Rear Suspension | Leaf Spring | Leaf spring with shock absorber |
| Front Wheels | 15 | 15 |
| Rear Wheels | 15 | 15 |
| Front Tires | 195/80R15LT | 195R15C |
| Rear Tires | 195/80R15LT | 195R15C |
| Rear Brakes | Drum | Drum |
| Steering Type | Power Steering | Hydraulic |
| Steering Column | Manual Tilt | Tilt |
| Tire Pressure Monitoring | No | No |
| Differential Lock | No | No |
| Front Brakes | — | Disc |
| Safety | ||
| Anti-lock Braking (ABS) | No | Yes |
| Electronic Brakeforce Distribution | No | No |
| Brake Assist | No | No |
| Parking Sensors | No | No |
| Stability Control | No | No |
| Traction Control | No | No |
| Vehicle Dynamic Control | No | No |
| Forward Collision Mitigation | No | No |
| Blind Spot Warning | No | No |
| Hill Start Assist | No | No |
| Hill Descent Control | No | No |
| Auto Stop/Start | No | No |
| Driver Airbag | Yes | No |
| Knee Airbag | No | No |
| Passenger Airbag | No | No |
| Front Curtain Airbags | No | No |
| Rear Curtain Airbags | No | No |
| Rear Side Airbags | No | No |
| Engine Immobilizer | No | Yes |
| Security Alarm | No | Yes |
| Door Locking | Standard | — |
| Comfort & Convenience | ||
| Air Conditioning | Manual, Dial Type | Manual Airconditioning |
| Rear A/C Vents | Yes | No |
| Seat Material | Fabric | Fabric |
| Parking Brake | Manual | Mechanical |
| Key Type | Manual | — |
| Push-Button Start | No | No |
| Cruise Control | No | No |
| Multi-Info Display | No | No |
| Paddle Shifters | No | No |
| Reverse Camera | No | No |
| Auto Headlights | No | No |
| Power Windows | Yes | Yes |
| Power Seats | No | No |
| Remote Trunk Release | No | No |
| Eco Mode | No | No |
| Antenna | yes | no |
| Infotainment & Audio | ||
| Speakers | 2 | 2 |
| Touchscreen | No | No |
| Navigation | No | No |
| Bluetooth | No | No |
| Apple CarPlay | No | No |
| Android Auto | No | No |
| USB | No | No |
| AUX Input | No | No |
| AM/FM Radio | No | Yes |
| CD Player | No | No |
| DVD Player | No | No |
| MP3 Playback | No | No |
| iPod Support | No | No |
| SD Card Slot | No | No |
| Lighting | ||
| Headlights | Halogen | Halogen |
| Fog Lights | Yes | No |
| Daytime Running Lights | No | No |
Nissan NV350 Urvan Cargo (2015) vs Toyota Hiace Cargo (2020): which should you buy?
For a Filipino business that needs a proven workhorse with a lower upfront cost, the 2015 Nissan NV350 Urvan Cargo is the more budget‑friendly option at ₱1,158,000, about ₱61,000 cheaper than the 2020 Toyota Hiace Cargo. The Nissan also delivers higher low‑end torque (356 Nm @ 1,400‑2,000 rpm) versus the Hiace’s 300 Nm, which translates to better pulling power when fully loaded, especially in city traffic and hill climbs. Its variable‑geometry turbo (VGS) helps maintain torque across a broader rpm range. However, the Hiace benefits from a newer model year, a longer‑lasting five‑year warranty, and a larger 2.98‑L engine that produces 136 PS, giving a modest power edge over the Nissan’s 129 PS. The Hiace’s body‑on‑frame construction and current‑model status may also mean easier access to parts and resale value. Both vans share the same 4‑door layout, three‑seat cargo configuration, and manual 5‑speed transmission, so practicality is similar. Choose the Nissan if upfront price and torque for heavy loads matter most and you can accept a discontinued model with a 3‑year/100,000 km warranty. Opt for the Toyota Hiace if you prefer a newer vehicle, longer warranty, slightly higher power, and potentially better after‑sales support despite the higher price.
Frequently asked questions
Which van is cheaper?
The Nissan NV350 Urvan Cargo costs ₱1,158,000, which is ₱61,000 less than the Toyota Hiace Cargo priced at ₱1,219,000.
Which offers more torque?
The Nissan provides 356 Nm of torque at 1,400‑2,000 rpm, surpassing the Hiace’s 300 Nm.
Is the warranty longer on the Hiace?
Yes, the Toyota Hiace Cargo comes with a five‑year warranty, while the Nissan’s warranty is limited to 100,000 km or three years.
Which has a newer model year and current availability?
The Toyota Hiace Cargo is a 2020 model and is currently available, whereas the Nissan NV350 Urvan Cargo is a 2015 model and has been discontinued.