Nissan NV350 Urvan Cargo (2015) vs Toyota Veloz 1.5 G CVT (2022)
A full spec-by-spec comparison of Nissan NV350 Urvan Cargo (2015) vs Toyota Veloz 1.5 G CVT (2022) — engine, performance, dimensions, features and price, with the differences highlighted to help you decide.
| Specification | Nissan NV350 Urvan Cargo (2015) Nissan ₱1,158,000 | Toyota Veloz 1.5 G CVT (2022) Toyota ₱1,222,000 |
|---|---|---|
| Overview | ||
| Model Year | 2015 | 2022 |
| Warranty | 100,000km/3-years | 3-years/100,000km |
| Availability | Discontinued | Current |
| Engine & Drivetrain | ||
| Engine Type | Inline-4 | Inline-4 |
| Displacement | 2488cc | 1496cc |
| Valvetrain | DOHC 16-valve | DOHC 16-valve |
| Aspiration | Variable Turbocharger (VGS) | Naturally Aspirated |
| Fuel Type | Diesel | Gasoline |
| Max Power | 129 PS @ 3200 rpm | 106 PS @ 6000 rpm |
| Max Torque | 356 Nm @ 1400-2000 rpm | 138 Nm @ 4200 rpm |
| Transmission | 5-Speed M/T (Dash-Mounted) | CVT |
| Drivetrain | — | FWD |
| Body & Dimensions | ||
| Body Type | Van | MPV AUV |
| Segment | M | MPV |
| Doors | 4 | 5 |
| Seating Capacity | 3 | 2+3+2 |
| Length (mm) | 5080 | 4475 |
| Width (mm) | 1695 | 1775 |
| Height (mm) | 2285 | 1700 |
| Wheelbase (mm) | 2940 | 2750 |
| Curb Weight (kg) | 1825 | 1140 |
| Fuel Tank (L) | 65 | 43 |
| Construction | — | Unibody |
| Exterior Colors | — | Platinum White Pearl, Silver Mica Metallic, Red Mica Metallic, Black Metallic |
| Chassis, Wheels & Brakes | ||
| Front Suspension | Torsion Bar with Front Stabilizer | MacPherson Struts w/ Coil Spring |
| Rear Suspension | Leaf Spring | Torsion Beam |
| Front Wheels | 15 | 17 |
| Rear Wheels | 15 | 17 |
| Front Tires | 195/80R15LT | 205/50/R17 |
| Rear Tires | 195/80R15LT | 205/50/R17 |
| Rear Brakes | Drum | Disc |
| Steering Type | Power Steering | EPS |
| Steering Column | Manual Tilt | Tilt + Telescopic |
| Tire Pressure Monitoring | No | No |
| Differential Lock | No | No |
| Front Brakes | — | Disc |
| Safety | ||
| Anti-lock Braking (ABS) | No | Yes |
| Electronic Brakeforce Distribution | No | Yes |
| Brake Assist | No | No |
| Parking Sensors | No | No |
| Stability Control | No | No |
| Traction Control | No | No |
| Vehicle Dynamic Control | No | No |
| Forward Collision Mitigation | No | No |
| Blind Spot Warning | No | No |
| Hill Start Assist | No | Yes |
| Hill Descent Control | No | No |
| Auto Stop/Start | No | No |
| Driver Airbag | Yes | No |
| Knee Airbag | No | No |
| Passenger Airbag | No | No |
| Front Curtain Airbags | No | No |
| Rear Curtain Airbags | No | No |
| Rear Side Airbags | No | No |
| Engine Immobilizer | No | Yes |
| Security Alarm | No | Yes |
| Door Locking | Standard | Central Locking |
| Comfort & Convenience | ||
| Air Conditioning | Manual, Dial Type | Automatic Climate Control |
| Rear A/C Vents | Yes | No |
| Seat Material | Fabric | Leather-Fabric |
| Parking Brake | Manual | EPB |
| Key Type | Manual | Keyless Entry |
| Push-Button Start | No | No |
| Cruise Control | No | No |
| Multi-Info Display | No | Yes |
| Paddle Shifters | No | No |
| Reverse Camera | No | No |
| Auto Headlights | No | No |
| Power Windows | Yes | Yes |
| Power Seats | No | No |
| Remote Trunk Release | No | Yes |
| Eco Mode | No | No |
| Antenna | yes | yes |
| Infotainment & Audio | ||
| Speakers | 2 | 6 |
| Touchscreen | No | Yes |
| Navigation | No | No |
| Bluetooth | No | Yes |
| Apple CarPlay | No | Yes |
| Android Auto | No | No |
| USB | No | Yes |
| AUX Input | No | No |
| AM/FM Radio | No | Yes |
| CD Player | No | No |
| DVD Player | No | No |
| MP3 Playback | No | No |
| iPod Support | No | No |
| SD Card Slot | No | No |
| Lighting | ||
| Headlights | Halogen | LED |
| Fog Lights | Yes | Yes |
| Daytime Running Lights | No | Yes |
Nissan NV350 Urvan Cargo (2015) vs Toyota Veloz 1.5 G CVT (2022): which should you buy?
For a Filipino buyer focused on cargo capacity and rugged utility, the 2015 Nissan NV350 Urvan Cargo is the clear choice. It costs ₱1,158,000, about ₱64,000 cheaper than the 2022 Toyota Veloz, and its van body (5080 mm L × 1695 mm W × 2285 mm H) offers far more interior volume for loading than the Veloz’s MPV dimensions. The Urvan’s diesel engine delivers 129 PS and a hefty 356 Nm of torque at low revs (1400‑2000 rpm), providing strong pulling power for heavy loads, whereas the Veloz’s 1.5‑L gasoline unit makes 106 PS and only 138 Nm at 4200 rpm, suited to passenger driving. Both have a 3‑year/100,000 km warranty, but the Urvan’s 5‑speed manual transmission gives more driver control when hauling, while the Veloz’s CVT offers smoother city cruising. The Urvan seats only three, maximizing cargo space, while the Veloz seats seven in a 2+3+2 layout, making it better for families. Availability also matters: the Urvan is discontinued, so finding a unit may require a used market search, whereas the Veloz is current and new‑car ready. Choose the Urvan if you need a budget‑friendly, high‑torque work van; choose the Veloz if you prioritize passenger comfort, modern styling, and a brand‑new purchase.
Frequently asked questions
Which vehicle is cheaper?
The Nissan NV350 Urvan Cargo is priced at ₱1,158,000, which is ₱64,000 less than the Toyota Veloz’s ₱1,222,000 price.
Which offers more power and torque?
The Urvan’s 2.5‑L diesel produces 129 PS and 356 Nm of torque, surpassing the Veloz’s 106 PS and 138 Nm from its 1.5‑L gasoline engine.
Which is better for carrying passengers?
The Toyota Veloz seats 7 (2+3+2) and is built as an MPV, while the Urvan only seats 3, focusing on cargo space.
Is either model discontinued?
Yes, the Nissan NV350 Urvan Cargo is listed as discontinued, whereas the Toyota Veloz is currently available as a new model.