Subaru Forester 2.0 XT CVT (2015) vs Isuzu mu-X LS-A 4×2 3.0 AT (2018)
A full spec-by-spec comparison of Subaru Forester 2.0 XT CVT (2015) vs Isuzu mu-X LS-A 4×2 3.0 AT (2018) — engine, performance, dimensions, features and price, with the differences highlighted to help you decide.
| Specification | Subaru Forester 2.0 XT CVT (2015) Subaru ₱1,948,000 | Isuzu mu-X LS-A 4×2 3.0 AT (2018) Isuzu ₱1,845,000 |
|---|---|---|
| Overview | ||
| Model Year | 2015 | 2018 |
| Warranty | 100,000km/3-years | 100,000 km/3-years |
| Availability | Discontinued | Current |
| Engine & Drivetrain | ||
| Engine Type | Flat-4 | Inline-4 |
| Displacement | 1998cc | 2999cc |
| Valvetrain | DOHC 16-valve | DOHC 16-valve |
| Aspiration | Turbo Direct Injection | Turbo Intercooler |
| Fuel Type | Gas | Diesel |
| Max Power | 240 PS @ 5600 rpm | 177 PS @ 3550 - 3650 rpm |
| Max Torque | 350 Nm @ 2400 - 3600 rpm | 380 Nm @ 1800-2800 rpm |
| Transmission | CVT | 6-Speed A/T |
| Drivetrain | AWD | RWD |
| Body & Dimensions | ||
| Body Type | SUV | SUV |
| Segment | J | J |
| Construction | Unibody | — |
| Doors | 5 | 4 |
| Seating Capacity | 2+3 | 2+3 |
| Length (mm) | 4595 | 4825 |
| Width (mm) | 1795 | 1860 |
| Height (mm) | 1735 | 1840 |
| Wheelbase (mm) | 2640 | 2845 |
| Curb Weight (kg) | 1620 | — |
| Fuel Tank (L) | — | 65 |
| Chassis, Wheels & Brakes | ||
| Front Suspension | MacPherson | Independent Double Wish bone with coil spring and stabilizer |
| Rear Suspension | Double Wishbone | 5-Link Coil Spring with Stabilizer |
| Front Wheels | 18" Alloys | 18 Alloy |
| Rear Wheels | 18" Alloys | 18 Alloy |
| Front Tires | 225/55/R18 | 255/60 R18 |
| Rear Tires | 225/55/R18 | 255/60 R18 |
| Front Brakes | Disc | Disc |
| Rear Brakes | Disc | Disc |
| Steering Column | tilt | Tilt & Telescopic |
| Tire Pressure Monitoring | No | No |
| Differential Lock | No | No |
| Steering Type | — | Power Asisted |
| Safety | ||
| Anti-lock Braking (ABS) | Yes | Yes |
| Electronic Brakeforce Distribution | Yes | Yes |
| Brake Assist | No | Yes |
| Parking Sensors | No | Yes |
| Stability Control | No | Yes |
| Traction Control | No | Yes |
| Vehicle Dynamic Control | No | No |
| Forward Collision Mitigation | No | No |
| Blind Spot Warning | No | No |
| Hill Start Assist | No | Yes |
| Hill Descent Control | No | Yes |
| Auto Stop/Start | No | No |
| Driver Airbag | No | Yes |
| Knee Airbag | No | No |
| Passenger Airbag | No | Yes |
| Front Curtain Airbags | No | No |
| Rear Curtain Airbags | No | No |
| Rear Side Airbags | No | No |
| Security Alarm | Yes | Yes |
| Door Locking | Central Locking | Central Locking |
| Engine Immobilizer | — | Yes |
| Comfort & Convenience | ||
| Air Conditioning | Automatic Climate Control | Auto Climate Control System |
| Rear A/C Vents | No | Yes |
| Seat Material | Leather | Leather |
| Parking Brake | Manual | Manual |
| Key Type | Keyless Entry | Keyless Entry |
| Push-Button Start | No | Yes |
| Cruise Control | No | Yes |
| Multi-Info Display | Yes | Yes |
| Paddle Shifters | No | No |
| Reverse Camera | No | Yes |
| Auto Headlights | No | No |
| Power Windows | Yes | Yes |
| Power Seats | Yes | Yes |
| Remote Trunk Release | No | No |
| Eco Mode | No | No |
| Antenna | yes | yes |
| Infotainment & Audio | ||
| Touchscreen | No | Yes |
| Navigation | No | Yes |
| Bluetooth | No | Yes |
| Apple CarPlay | No | No |
| Android Auto | No | No |
| USB | No | Yes |
| AUX Input | Yes | Yes |
| AM/FM Radio | Yes | Yes |
| CD Player | Yes | Yes |
| DVD Player | No | Yes |
| MP3 Playback | Yes | Yes |
| iPod Support | No | Yes |
| SD Card Slot | No | No |
| Speakers | — | 6 |
| Lighting | ||
| Headlights | HID headlamps + Foglamps | LED |
| Fog Lights | Yes | Yes |
| Daytime Running Lights | No | Yes |
Subaru Forester 2.0 XT CVT (2015) vs Isuzu mu-X LS-A 4×2 3.0 AT (2018): which should you buy?
For a Filipino buyer weighing performance against practicality, the 2015 Subaru Forester 2.0 XT CVT and the 2018 Isuzu mu‑X LS‑A 4×2 present distinct trade‑offs. The Forester costs ₱1,948,000, about ₱103,000 more than the mu‑X, but it delivers 240 PS and 350 Nm of torque from a 2.0 L turbo‑charged flat‑four, giving it a clear edge in power and a smoother CVT drivetrain. Its AWD system also adds confidence on wet or mountainous roads, which is valuable in many Philippine provinces. However, the Forester is discontinued, may have limited parts availability, and is slightly shorter (4,595 mm) with five doors, offering easier rear‑seat access. The mu‑X, priced at ₱1,845,000, uses a larger 3.0 L turbo‑diesel inline‑four that produces 177 PS but a higher torque peak of 380 Nm at lower rpm, favoring fuel‑efficient cruising and load‑carrying. It comes with a 6‑speed automatic, RWD layout, and a longer body (4,825 mm) with four doors, giving a roomier cabin and cargo space. If you prioritize outright power, AWD grip, and a newer‑feel SUV for mixed‑terrain driving, the Subaru is the better pick, provided you accept the discontinued status. If you need a more affordable, diesel‑powered SUV with higher torque for highway use and better rear‑seat access, the Isuzu mu‑X is the practical choice.
Frequently asked questions
Which model is cheaper?
The Isuzu mu‑X LS‑A 4×2 3.0 AT (2018) is cheaper at ₱1,845,000 compared to the Subaru Forester 2.0 XT CVT (2015) priced at ₱1,948,000.
Which SUV has more power?
The Subaru Forester 2.0 XT CVT produces 240 PS, while the Isuzu mu‑X generates 177 PS, making the Forester the more powerful model.
Is the Subaru still available new?
No, the Subaru Forester 2.0 XT CVT is listed as discontinued, whereas the Isuzu mu‑X is currently available.
Which vehicle is better for daily commuting in the Philippines?
The Isuzu mu‑X, with its diesel engine, higher low‑rpm torque and lower price, is generally more fuel‑efficient and practical for daily commuting, while the Subaru offers AWD and higher power for more demanding driving conditions.