Suzuki Alto 800 0.8 Standard MT (2015) vs Suzuki Swift Dzire 1.2 MT (2015)
A full spec-by-spec comparison of Suzuki Alto 800 0.8 Standard MT (2015) vs Suzuki Swift Dzire 1.2 MT (2015) — engine, performance, dimensions, features and price, with the differences highlighted to help you decide.
| Specification | Suzuki Alto 800 0.8 Standard MT (2015) Suzuki ₱445,000 | Suzuki Swift Dzire 1.2 MT (2015) Suzuki ₱568,000 |
|---|---|---|
| Overview | ||
| Model Year | 2015 | 2015 |
| Warranty | 100,000km/3-years | 100,000km/3-years |
| Availability | Current | Discontinued |
| Engine & Drivetrain | ||
| Engine Type | Inline-3 | Inline-4 |
| Displacement | 796cc | 1197cc |
| Valvetrain | SOHC 12-valve | DOHC 16-valve |
| Aspiration | Naturally Aspirated | Naturally Aspirated |
| Fuel Type | Gas | Gas |
| Max Power | 48 PS @ 6200 rpm | 87 PS @ 6000 rpm |
| Max Torque | 68 Nm @ 3500 rpm | 114 Nm @ 4000 rpm |
| Transmission | 5-Speed M/T | 5-Speed M/T |
| Drivetrain | FWD | FWD |
| Body & Dimensions | ||
| Body Type | Hatchback | Sedan |
| Segment | A | B |
| Construction | Unibody | Unibody |
| Doors | 5 | 4 |
| Seating Capacity | 2+3 | 2+3 |
| Length (mm) | 3395 | 3995 |
| Width (mm) | 1490 | 1695 |
| Height (mm) | 1475 | 1555 |
| Wheelbase (mm) | 2360 | 2430 |
| Curb Weight (kg) | 725 | 960 |
| Fuel Tank (L) | 35 | 42 |
| Chassis, Wheels & Brakes | ||
| Front Suspension | MacPherson | MacPherson |
| Rear Suspension | Multi-link Rigid Axle | Torsion Beam |
| Front Wheels | 13 | 15" Steel |
| Rear Wheels | 13 | 15" Steel |
| Front Tires | 145/70 R13 | 185/65 R15 |
| Rear Tires | 145/70 R13 | 185/65 R15 |
| Front Brakes | Disc | Disc |
| Rear Brakes | Drum | Drum |
| Steering Column | tilt | tilt |
| Tire Pressure Monitoring | No | No |
| Differential Lock | No | No |
| Safety | ||
| Anti-lock Braking (ABS) | No | No |
| Electronic Brakeforce Distribution | No | No |
| Brake Assist | No | No |
| Parking Sensors | No | No |
| Stability Control | No | No |
| Traction Control | No | No |
| Vehicle Dynamic Control | No | No |
| Forward Collision Mitigation | No | No |
| Blind Spot Warning | No | No |
| Hill Start Assist | No | No |
| Hill Descent Control | No | No |
| Auto Stop/Start | No | No |
| Driver Airbag | No | Yes |
| Knee Airbag | No | No |
| Passenger Airbag | No | Yes |
| Front Curtain Airbags | No | No |
| Rear Curtain Airbags | No | No |
| Rear Side Airbags | No | No |
| Engine Immobilizer | No | No |
| Security Alarm | No | No |
| Door Locking | Standard | Standard |
| Comfort & Convenience | ||
| Air Conditioning | Manual Aircon | Manual Aircon |
| Rear A/C Vents | Yes | No |
| Seat Material | Fabric | Fabric |
| Parking Brake | Manual | Manual |
| Key Type | Standard Key | Standard Key |
| Push-Button Start | No | No |
| Cruise Control | No | No |
| Multi-Info Display | No | No |
| Paddle Shifters | No | No |
| Reverse Camera | No | No |
| Auto Headlights | No | No |
| Power Windows | No | Yes |
| Power Seats | No | No |
| Remote Trunk Release | No | No |
| Eco Mode | No | No |
| Antenna | yes | yes |
| Infotainment & Audio | ||
| Speakers | 2 | 4 |
| Touchscreen | No | No |
| Navigation | No | No |
| Bluetooth | No | No |
| Apple CarPlay | No | No |
| Android Auto | No | No |
| USB | Yes | Yes |
| AUX Input | Yes | Yes |
| AM/FM Radio | Yes | Yes |
| CD Player | Yes | Yes |
| DVD Player | No | No |
| MP3 Playback | Yes | Yes |
| iPod Support | No | No |
| SD Card Slot | No | No |
| Lighting | ||
| Headlights | Halogen | Halogen |
| Fog Lights | Yes | Yes |
| Daytime Running Lights | No | No |
Suzuki Alto 800 0.8 Standard MT (2015) vs Suzuki Swift Dzire 1.2 MT (2015): which should you buy?
For most Filipino buyers prioritizing budget and simplicity, the Suzuki Alto 800 0.8 (₱445,000) is the better pick. Its lower price of ₱445,000 gives you a more economical daily run for the same 5-speed manual transmission and 2+3 seating. The Swift Dzire (₱568,000) is priced higher, but it trades that savings for a significantly stronger engine (87 PS vs 48 PS) and a sedan body that seats 4 instead of 5. The Alto’s naturally aspirated 796cc unit is adequate for city use, while the Swift’s 1197cc DOHC engine delivers more torque. The Alto’s hatchback design may offer slightly better cargo space, but the Swift’s larger interior is worth the extra cost for those needing extra passenger room. Given the Alto’s current availability and lower sticker price, it’s the clearer value for most commuters, though the Swift offers better performance if you plan to handle heavier loads or highway driving.