Suzuki Alto 800 0.8 Standard MT (2015) vs Toyota Wigo 1.0 E MT (2015)
A full spec-by-spec comparison of Suzuki Alto 800 0.8 Standard MT (2015) vs Toyota Wigo 1.0 E MT (2015) — engine, performance, dimensions, features and price, with the differences highlighted to help you decide.
| Specification | Suzuki Alto 800 0.8 Standard MT (2015) Suzuki ₱445,000 | Toyota Wigo 1.0 E MT (2015) Toyota ₱473,000 |
|---|---|---|
| Overview | ||
| Model Year | 2015 | 2015 |
| Warranty | 100,000km/3-years | 100,000km/3-years |
| Availability | Current | Discontinued |
| Engine & Drivetrain | ||
| Engine Type | Inline-3 | Inline-3 |
| Displacement | 796cc | 998cc |
| Valvetrain | SOHC 12-valve | DOHC 12valve |
| Aspiration | Naturally Aspirated | Naturally Aspirated |
| Fuel Type | Gas | Gas |
| Max Power | 48 PS @ 6200 rpm | 65 PS @ 6000 rpm |
| Max Torque | 68 Nm @ 3500 rpm | 85 Nm @ 3600 rpm |
| Transmission | 5-Speed M/T | 5-Speed M/T |
| Drivetrain | FWD | FWD |
| Body & Dimensions | ||
| Body Type | Hatchback | Hatchback |
| Segment | A | A |
| Construction | Unibody | Unibody |
| Doors | 5 | 5 |
| Seating Capacity | 2+3 | 2+3 |
| Length (mm) | 3395 | 3600 |
| Width (mm) | 1490 | 1600 |
| Height (mm) | 1475 | 1520 |
| Wheelbase (mm) | 2360 | 2450 |
| Curb Weight (kg) | 725 | 1410 |
| Fuel Tank (L) | 35 | 33 |
| Chassis, Wheels & Brakes | ||
| Front Suspension | MacPherson | MacPherson w/ Coil Spring |
| Rear Suspension | Multi-link Rigid Axle | Torsion Axle Beam w/ Coil Spring |
| Front Wheels | 13 | 13 |
| Rear Wheels | 13 | 13 |
| Front Tires | 145/70 R13 | 155/80 R13 |
| Rear Tires | 145/70 R13 | 155/80 R13 |
| Front Brakes | Disc | Disc |
| Rear Brakes | Drum | Drum |
| Steering Column | tilt | Tilt |
| Tire Pressure Monitoring | No | No |
| Differential Lock | No | No |
| Steering Type | — | Power |
| Safety | ||
| Anti-lock Braking (ABS) | No | Yes |
| Electronic Brakeforce Distribution | No | No |
| Brake Assist | No | No |
| Parking Sensors | No | No |
| Stability Control | No | No |
| Traction Control | No | No |
| Vehicle Dynamic Control | No | No |
| Forward Collision Mitigation | No | No |
| Blind Spot Warning | No | No |
| Hill Start Assist | No | No |
| Hill Descent Control | No | No |
| Auto Stop/Start | No | No |
| Driver Airbag | No | Yes |
| Knee Airbag | No | No |
| Passenger Airbag | No | Yes |
| Front Curtain Airbags | No | No |
| Rear Curtain Airbags | No | No |
| Rear Side Airbags | No | No |
| Engine Immobilizer | No | No |
| Security Alarm | No | No |
| Door Locking | Standard | Manual |
| Comfort & Convenience | ||
| Air Conditioning | Manual Aircon | Manual |
| Rear A/C Vents | Yes | Yes |
| Seat Material | Fabric | Fabric |
| Parking Brake | Manual | Manual |
| Key Type | Standard Key | Standard Key |
| Push-Button Start | No | No |
| Cruise Control | No | No |
| Multi-Info Display | No | Yes |
| Paddle Shifters | No | No |
| Reverse Camera | No | No |
| Auto Headlights | No | No |
| Power Windows | No | Yes |
| Power Seats | No | No |
| Remote Trunk Release | No | No |
| Eco Mode | No | No |
| Antenna | yes | yes |
| Infotainment & Audio | ||
| Speakers | 2 | 2 |
| Touchscreen | No | No |
| Navigation | No | No |
| Bluetooth | No | No |
| Apple CarPlay | No | No |
| Android Auto | No | No |
| USB | Yes | Yes |
| AUX Input | Yes | Yes |
| AM/FM Radio | Yes | Yes |
| CD Player | Yes | No |
| DVD Player | No | No |
| MP3 Playback | Yes | Yes |
| iPod Support | No | No |
| SD Card Slot | No | No |
| Lighting | ||
| Headlights | Halogen | Halogen |
| Fog Lights | Yes | Yes |
| Daytime Running Lights | No | No |
Suzuki Alto 800 0.8 Standard MT (2015) vs Toyota Wigo 1.0 E MT (2015): which should you buy?
For a Filipino buyer focused on budget and everyday city driving, the Suzuki Alto 800 0.8 Standard MT edges out the Toyota Wigo 1.0 E MT mainly because of its lower price tag of ₱445,000 versus ₱473,000, saving ₱28,000. The Alto’s compact 3395 mm length also makes it easier to park in tight Manila streets, though the Wigo is slightly longer at 3600 mm, offering a bit more rear‑overhang. Power‑wise the Wigo leads with 65 PS and 85 Nm, giving a modest performance advantage over the Alto’s 48 PS and 68 Nm, which may matter on highways or when carrying a full load of five passengers. Both share the same 5‑speed manual, front‑wheel‑drive layout and 2+3 seating, so interior space is comparable. Warranty coverage is identical (100,000 km/3 years) and both are built on unibody hatchbacks in the A‑segment. Availability is a key differentiator: the Alto is listed as “Current,” ensuring new‑car purchase and dealer support, while the Wigo is discontinued, meaning you’d be buying leftover stock or a used unit. Choose the Alto if you prioritize the lowest upfront cost, easier maneuverability, and guaranteed new‑car availability. Opt for the Wigo if you need the extra power for occasional highway trips and are comfortable sourcing a discontinued model.
Frequently asked questions
Which model is cheaper?
The Suzuki Alto 800 costs ₱445,000, which is ₱28,000 less than the Toyota Wigo’s ₱473,000 price.
Which car has more power?
The Toyota Wigo 1.0 E MT produces 65 PS and 85 Nm, while the Suzuki Alto 800 delivers 48 PS and 68 Nm, making the Wigo more powerful.
Is the Toyota Wigo still available new?
No, the Wigo is listed as discontinued, so new units are not being produced.
Which vehicle is more practical for tight city parking?
The Alto’s shorter length of 3395 mm makes it easier to maneuver and park in narrow urban spaces compared to the Wigo’s 3600 mm length.