Suzuki APV Type II SGX AT (2015) vs Tata Manza Aura 1.3 MT Dsl (2015)

A full spec-by-spec comparison of Suzuki APV Type II SGX AT (2015) vs Tata Manza Aura 1.3 MT Dsl (2015) — engine, performance, dimensions, features and price, with the differences highlighted to help you decide.

Specification Suzuki APV Type II SGX AT (2015) Suzuki ₱820,000 Tata Manza Aura 1.3 MT Dsl (2015) Tata ₱738,000
Overview
Model Year 2015 2015
Warranty 100,000km/3-years 100,000km/3-years
Availability Discontinued Current
Engine & Drivetrain
Engine Type Inline-4 4-inline
Displacement 1590cc 1248cc
Valvetrain SOHC 16-valve DOHC 16-valve
Aspiration Naturally Aspirated VGT w/ Intercooler
Fuel Type Gas Diesel
Max Power 91 PS @ 5750 rpm 90 ps @ 4000 rpm
Max Torque 127 Nm @ 4500 rpm 200 Nm @ 1750-3000rpm
Transmission 4-Speed A/T 5-Speed M/T
Drivetrain RWD FWD
Body & Dimensions
Body Type MPV Sedan
Segment M
Construction Body-on-frame Monocoque
Doors 5 4
Seating Capacity 2+2+3 2+3
Length (mm) 4230 4413
Width (mm) 1655 1703
Height (mm) 1855 1550
Wheelbase (mm) 2625 2520
Curb Weight (kg) 1300 1100
Fuel Tank (L) 46 44
Chassis, Wheels & Brakes
Front Suspension MacPherson MacPherson
Rear Suspension Rigid Axle, Leaf Springs Semi-Independent Twist Beam
Front Wheels 14x5.5" Alloys 15 inch steel
Rear Wheels 14x5.5" Alloys 15 inch steel
Front Tires 185/60 R14 185/60 R15
Rear Tires 185/60 R14 185/60 R15
Front Brakes Disc Ventilated Disc
Rear Brakes Drum Drum
Steering Column tilt tilt
Tire Pressure Monitoring No No
Differential Lock No No
Steering Type EPS
Safety
Anti-lock Braking (ABS) Yes Yes
Electronic Brakeforce Distribution Yes Yes
Brake Assist No No
Parking Sensors No No
Stability Control No No
Traction Control No No
Vehicle Dynamic Control No No
Forward Collision Mitigation No No
Blind Spot Warning No No
Hill Start Assist No No
Hill Descent Control No No
Auto Stop/Start No No
Driver Airbag Yes Yes
Knee Airbag No No
Passenger Airbag Yes Yes
Front Curtain Airbags No No
Rear Curtain Airbags No No
Rear Side Airbags No No
Engine Immobilizer No Yes
Security Alarm Yes Yes
Door Locking Central Locking Standard
Comfort & Convenience
Air Conditioning Manual Aircon Manual Aircon w/ Heater
Rear A/C Vents No No
Seat Material Fabric Fabric
Parking Brake Manual Manual
Key Type Keyless Entry Standard Key
Push-Button Start No No
Cruise Control No No
Multi-Info Display No Yes
Paddle Shifters No No
Reverse Camera No No
Auto Headlights No No
Power Windows Yes Yes
Power Seats No No
Remote Trunk Release No Yes
Eco Mode No No
Antenna yes yes
Roadside Assistance 0
Infotainment & Audio
Speakers 6 6
Touchscreen No No
Navigation No No
Bluetooth No Yes
Apple CarPlay No No
Android Auto No No
USB Yes Yes
AUX Input Yes Yes
AM/FM Radio Yes Yes
CD Player Yes Yes
DVD Player No No
MP3 Playback Yes Yes
iPod Support No Yes
SD Card Slot No No
Lighting
Headlights Halogen Halogen w/ leveling
Fog Lights Yes Yes
Daytime Running Lights No No
Performance & Economy
Emission Standard 0
Keep comparing Add another model to this matchup — line up to four side by side.

Suzuki APV Type II SGX AT (2015) vs Tata Manza Aura 1.3 MT Dsl (2015): which should you buy?

The Suzuki APV Type II SGX AT is the better choice for most Filipino buyers prioritizing value and practicality. At ₱820,000, it costs ₱82,000 more than the Tata Manza Aura 1.3 MT Dsl, which is priced at ₱738,000. However, the APV offers a 5-door MPV with 2+2+3 seating capacity, making it superior for families needing flexible space, while the Tata is a 4-door sedan with 2+3 seating. Both vehicles share a 100,000km/3-year warranty, but the APV’s 4-speed automatic transmission and rear-wheel-drive setup are practical for Philippine roads, whereas the Tata’s 5-speed manual and front-wheel-drive design may limit comfort and fuel efficiency. The APV’s 1590cc inline-4 engine delivers 91 PS, matching the Tata’s 90 PS but with a slightly higher torque output at 127 Nm vs 200 Nm. Given the APV’s lower price and broader utility, it is ideal for budget-conscious buyers needing a spacious family vehicle, while the Tata suits those valuing fuel efficiency and sedan comfort, though at a higher cost.