Suzuki APV Type II SGX AT (2015) vs Suzuki Ertiga GA (2016)
A full spec-by-spec comparison of Suzuki APV Type II SGX AT (2015) vs Suzuki Ertiga GA (2016) — engine, performance, dimensions, features and price, with the differences highlighted to help you decide.
| Specification | Suzuki APV Type II SGX AT (2015) Suzuki ₱820,000 | Suzuki Ertiga GA (2016) Suzuki ₱699,000 |
|---|---|---|
| Overview | ||
| Model Year | 2015 | 2016 |
| Warranty | 100,000km/3-years | 100,000km/3-years |
| Availability | Discontinued | Current |
| Engine & Drivetrain | ||
| Engine Type | Inline-4 | Inline-4 |
| Displacement | 1590cc | 1373cc |
| Valvetrain | SOHC 16-valve | DOHC 16-valve |
| Aspiration | Naturally Aspirated | Fuel Injection |
| Fuel Type | Gas | Gas |
| Max Power | 91 PS @ 5750 rpm | 96 PS @ 6000 rpm |
| Max Torque | 127 Nm @ 4500 rpm | 130 Nm @ 4000 rpm |
| Transmission | 4-Speed A/T | 5-Speed M/T |
| Drivetrain | RWD | FWD |
| Body & Dimensions | ||
| Body Type | MPV | MPV |
| Segment | M | M |
| Construction | Body-on-frame | Unibody |
| Doors | 5 | 5 |
| Seating Capacity | 2+2+3 | 2+2+3 |
| Length (mm) | 4230 | 4265 |
| Width (mm) | 1655 | 1695 |
| Height (mm) | 1855 | 1985 |
| Wheelbase (mm) | 2625 | 2740 |
| Curb Weight (kg) | 1300 | 1155 |
| Fuel Tank (L) | 46 | 45 |
| Chassis, Wheels & Brakes | ||
| Front Suspension | MacPherson | MacPherson Strut with Coil Spring |
| Rear Suspension | Rigid Axle, Leaf Springs | Torsion Beam w/ Coil Spring |
| Front Wheels | 14x5.5" Alloys | 15'' Steel |
| Rear Wheels | 14x5.5" Alloys | 15'' Steel |
| Front Tires | 185/60 R14 | 185/65 R15 |
| Rear Tires | 185/60 R14 | 185/65 R15 |
| Front Brakes | Disc | Disc |
| Rear Brakes | Drum | Drum |
| Steering Column | tilt | tilt + tele |
| Tire Pressure Monitoring | No | No |
| Differential Lock | No | No |
| Steering Type | — | EPS |
| Safety | ||
| Anti-lock Braking (ABS) | Yes | No |
| Electronic Brakeforce Distribution | Yes | No |
| Brake Assist | No | No |
| Parking Sensors | No | No |
| Stability Control | No | No |
| Traction Control | No | No |
| Vehicle Dynamic Control | No | No |
| Forward Collision Mitigation | No | No |
| Blind Spot Warning | No | No |
| Hill Start Assist | No | No |
| Hill Descent Control | No | No |
| Auto Stop/Start | No | No |
| Driver Airbag | Yes | Yes |
| Knee Airbag | No | No |
| Passenger Airbag | Yes | Yes |
| Front Curtain Airbags | No | No |
| Rear Curtain Airbags | No | No |
| Rear Side Airbags | No | No |
| Engine Immobilizer | No | No |
| Security Alarm | Yes | Yes |
| Door Locking | Central Locking | Central Locking |
| Comfort & Convenience | ||
| Air Conditioning | Manual Aircon | Manual Aircon |
| Rear A/C Vents | No | Yes |
| Seat Material | Fabric | Fabric |
| Parking Brake | Manual | Manual |
| Key Type | Keyless Entry | Standard Key |
| Push-Button Start | No | No |
| Cruise Control | No | No |
| Multi-Info Display | No | Yes |
| Paddle Shifters | No | No |
| Reverse Camera | No | No |
| Auto Headlights | No | No |
| Power Windows | Yes | No |
| Power Seats | No | No |
| Remote Trunk Release | No | No |
| Eco Mode | No | No |
| Antenna | yes | yes |
| Infotainment & Audio | ||
| Speakers | 6 | 2 |
| Touchscreen | No | No |
| Navigation | No | No |
| Bluetooth | No | No |
| Apple CarPlay | No | No |
| Android Auto | No | No |
| USB | Yes | Yes |
| AUX Input | Yes | Yes |
| AM/FM Radio | Yes | Yes |
| CD Player | Yes | Yes |
| DVD Player | No | No |
| MP3 Playback | Yes | Yes |
| iPod Support | No | No |
| SD Card Slot | No | No |
| Lighting | ||
| Headlights | Halogen | Halogen |
| Fog Lights | Yes | Yes |
| Daytime Running Lights | No | No |
Suzuki APV Type II SGX AT (2015) vs Suzuki Ertiga GA (2016): which should you buy?
For a Filipino buyer prioritizing budget and daily reliability, the Suzuki Ertiga GA (₱699,000) is the better choice. It is cheaper than the discontinued APV Type II SGX AT (₱820,000) and offers superior power (96 PS vs. 91 PS) and a more modern fuel-injection system. The Ertiga’s FWD drivetrain and 5-speed manual transmission may suit those who value direct engine control, while the APV’s RWD and 4-speed automatic transmission offer simpler operation. Both seat 2+2+3 passengers and are MPVs, but the Ertiga’s unibody construction and higher torque (130 Nm vs. 127 Nm) provide better rigidity for heavier loads. Given the APV is discontinued, the Ertiga’s availability is a practical advantage. Ultimately, choose the Ertiga for value and performance, and the APV if budget constraints are extreme and you accept limited options.
Frequently asked questions
Which is cheaper?
The Suzuki Ertiga GA costs ₱699,000, while the Suzuki APV Type II SGX AT costs ₱820,000.
Which is more powerful?
The Suzuki Ertiga GA delivers 96 PS, while the Suzuki APV Type II SGX AT delivers 91 PS.
Which is better for daily commuting?
Both have identical seating (2+2+3) and are MPVs, but the Ertiga’s 5-speed manual transmission and FWD may offer easier handling in urban traffic.
Which has better fuel efficiency?
Data is insufficient; no fuel economy figures are provided in the data.