Suzuki APV Type II SGX AT (2015) vs Suzuki Ertiga GL AT (2016)

A full spec-by-spec comparison of Suzuki APV Type II SGX AT (2015) vs Suzuki Ertiga GL AT (2016) — engine, performance, dimensions, features and price, with the differences highlighted to help you decide.

Specification Suzuki APV Type II SGX AT (2015) Suzuki ₱820,000 Suzuki Ertiga GL AT (2016) Suzuki ₱865,000
Overview
Model Year 2015 2016
Warranty 100,000km/3-years 100,000km/3-years
Availability Discontinued Current
Engine & Drivetrain
Engine Type Inline-4 Inline-4
Displacement 1590cc 1373cc
Valvetrain SOHC 16-valve DOHC 16-valve
Aspiration Naturally Aspirated Fuel Injection
Fuel Type Gas Gas
Max Power 91 PS @ 5750 rpm 96 PS @ 6000 rpm
Max Torque 127 Nm @ 4500 rpm 130 Nm @ 4000 rpm
Transmission 4-Speed A/T 4-Speed AT
Drivetrain RWD FWD
Body & Dimensions
Body Type MPV MPV
Segment M M
Construction Body-on-frame Unibody
Doors 5 5
Seating Capacity 2+2+3 2+2+3
Length (mm) 4230 4265
Width (mm) 1655 1695
Height (mm) 1855 1985
Wheelbase (mm) 2625 2740
Curb Weight (kg) 1300 1185
Fuel Tank (L) 46 45
Chassis, Wheels & Brakes
Front Suspension MacPherson MacPherson Strut with Coil Spring
Rear Suspension Rigid Axle, Leaf Springs Torsion Beam w/ Coil Spring
Front Wheels 14x5.5" Alloys 15'' Alloys
Rear Wheels 14x5.5" Alloys 15'' Alloys
Front Tires 185/60 R14 185/65 R15
Rear Tires 185/60 R14 185/65 R15
Front Brakes Disc Disc
Rear Brakes Drum Drum
Steering Column tilt tilt + tele
Tire Pressure Monitoring No No
Differential Lock No No
Steering Type EPS
Safety
Anti-lock Braking (ABS) Yes No
Electronic Brakeforce Distribution Yes No
Brake Assist No No
Parking Sensors No No
Stability Control No No
Traction Control No No
Vehicle Dynamic Control No No
Forward Collision Mitigation No No
Blind Spot Warning No No
Hill Start Assist No No
Hill Descent Control No No
Auto Stop/Start No No
Driver Airbag Yes Yes
Knee Airbag No No
Passenger Airbag Yes Yes
Front Curtain Airbags No No
Rear Curtain Airbags No No
Rear Side Airbags No No
Engine Immobilizer No Yes
Security Alarm Yes Yes
Door Locking Central Locking Central Locking
Comfort & Convenience
Air Conditioning Manual Aircon Manual Aircon
Rear A/C Vents No Yes
Seat Material Fabric Fabric
Parking Brake Manual Manual
Key Type Keyless Entry Keyless Entry
Push-Button Start No No
Cruise Control No No
Multi-Info Display No Yes
Paddle Shifters No No
Reverse Camera No No
Auto Headlights No No
Power Windows Yes Yes
Power Seats No No
Remote Trunk Release No No
Eco Mode No No
Antenna yes yes
Infotainment & Audio
Speakers 6 4
Touchscreen No Yes
Navigation No Yes
Bluetooth No No
Apple CarPlay No No
Android Auto No No
USB Yes Yes
AUX Input Yes Yes
AM/FM Radio Yes Yes
CD Player Yes Yes
DVD Player No No
MP3 Playback Yes Yes
iPod Support No No
SD Card Slot No No
Lighting
Headlights Halogen Halogen
Fog Lights Yes Yes
Daytime Running Lights No No
Keep comparing Add another model to this matchup — line up to four side by side.

Suzuki APV Type II SGX AT (2015) vs Suzuki Ertiga GL AT (2016): which should you buy?

For a Filipino buyer, the Suzuki APV Type II SGX AT (2015) is a discontinued body-on-frame MPV with a 1.6L engine (91 PS, 127 Nm) and RWD, priced at ₱820,000. It offers ruggedness and a 2+2+3 seating layout, but its older design and 4-speed A/T may feel dated. The Suzuki Ertiga GL AT (2016) is a current unibody MPV with a 1.4L engine (96 PS, 130 Nm) and FWD, priced at ₱865,000. It has slightly more power and torque, better fuel efficiency due to smaller displacement and DOHC, and a more modern platform. The Ertiga is better for daily commuting and family use, offering a smoother ride and newer features. The APV is cheaper but discontinued, making parts and resale less certain. Choose the Ertiga for overall practicality, efficiency, and modern design; choose the APV only if you need a rugged, body-on-frame MPV for rough roads or heavy loads and are okay with an older model.

Frequently asked questions

Which is cheaper?

The Suzuki APV Type II SGX AT (2015) is cheaper at ₱820,000 compared to the Ertiga GL AT (2016) at ₱865,000.

Which is more powerful?

The Suzuki Ertiga GL AT (2016) has slightly more power (96 PS vs 91 PS) and torque (130 Nm vs 127 Nm) than the APV.

Which is better for daily commuting?

The Ertiga is better for daily commuting due to its unibody construction, FWD, and more modern engine (DOHC, fuel injection) offering better fuel efficiency and ride comfort.

Which has a more rugged construction?

The Suzuki APV has a body-on-frame construction, making it more rugged and suitable for rough roads or heavy loads compared to the Ertiga's unibody.