Suzuki APV Type II SGX AT (2015) vs Toyota Vios 1.3 E MT (2016)
A full spec-by-spec comparison of Suzuki APV Type II SGX AT (2015) vs Toyota Vios 1.3 E MT (2016) — engine, performance, dimensions, features and price, with the differences highlighted to help you decide.
| Specification | Suzuki APV Type II SGX AT (2015) Suzuki ₱820,000 | Toyota Vios 1.3 E MT (2016) Toyota ₱791,000 |
|---|---|---|
| Overview | ||
| Model Year | 2015 | 2016 |
| Warranty | 100,000km/3-years | 100,000km/3-years |
| Availability | Discontinued | Current |
| Engine & Drivetrain | ||
| Engine Type | Inline-4 | Inline-4 |
| Displacement | 1590cc | 1329cc |
| Valvetrain | SOHC 16-valve | DOHC 16-valve |
| Aspiration | Naturally Aspirated | Naturally Aspirated, Dual VVT-i |
| Fuel Type | Gas | Gas |
| Max Power | 91 PS @ 5750 rpm | 99 PS @ 6000 rpm |
| Max Torque | 127 Nm @ 4500 rpm | 123 Nm @ 4400 rpm |
| Transmission | 4-Speed A/T | 5-Speed MT |
| Drivetrain | RWD | FWD |
| Body & Dimensions | ||
| Body Type | MPV | Sedan |
| Segment | M | B |
| Construction | Body-on-frame | Unibody |
| Doors | 5 | 4 |
| Seating Capacity | 2+2+3 | 2+3 |
| Length (mm) | 4230 | 4410 |
| Width (mm) | 1655 | 1700 |
| Height (mm) | 1855 | 1475 |
| Wheelbase (mm) | 2625 | 2550 |
| Curb Weight (kg) | 1300 | — |
| Fuel Tank (L) | 46 | — |
| Chassis, Wheels & Brakes | ||
| Front Suspension | MacPherson | MacPherson |
| Rear Suspension | Rigid Axle, Leaf Springs | Torsion Beam |
| Front Wheels | 14x5.5" Alloys | 15 |
| Rear Wheels | 14x5.5" Alloys | 15 |
| Front Tires | 185/60 R14 | 185/60 R15 |
| Rear Tires | 185/60 R14 | 185/60 R15 |
| Front Brakes | Disc | Disc |
| Rear Brakes | Drum | Drum |
| Steering Column | tilt | Tilt |
| Tire Pressure Monitoring | No | No |
| Differential Lock | No | No |
| Steering Type | — | Power |
| Safety | ||
| Anti-lock Braking (ABS) | Yes | Yes |
| Electronic Brakeforce Distribution | Yes | Yes |
| Brake Assist | No | Yes |
| Parking Sensors | No | No |
| Stability Control | No | No |
| Traction Control | No | No |
| Vehicle Dynamic Control | No | No |
| Forward Collision Mitigation | No | No |
| Blind Spot Warning | No | No |
| Hill Start Assist | No | No |
| Hill Descent Control | No | No |
| Auto Stop/Start | No | No |
| Driver Airbag | Yes | Yes |
| Knee Airbag | No | No |
| Passenger Airbag | Yes | Yes |
| Front Curtain Airbags | No | No |
| Rear Curtain Airbags | No | No |
| Rear Side Airbags | No | No |
| Engine Immobilizer | No | No |
| Security Alarm | Yes | Yes |
| Door Locking | Central Locking | Central Locking |
| Comfort & Convenience | ||
| Air Conditioning | Manual Aircon | Manual |
| Rear A/C Vents | No | Yes |
| Seat Material | Fabric | Fabric |
| Parking Brake | Manual | Manual |
| Key Type | Keyless Entry | Keyless Entry |
| Push-Button Start | No | No |
| Cruise Control | No | No |
| Multi-Info Display | No | No |
| Paddle Shifters | No | No |
| Reverse Camera | No | No |
| Auto Headlights | No | No |
| Power Windows | Yes | Yes |
| Power Seats | No | No |
| Remote Trunk Release | No | No |
| Eco Mode | No | No |
| Antenna | yes | yes |
| Infotainment & Audio | ||
| Speakers | 6 | 4 |
| Touchscreen | No | Yes |
| Navigation | No | No |
| Bluetooth | No | Yes |
| Apple CarPlay | No | No |
| Android Auto | No | No |
| USB | Yes | Yes |
| AUX Input | Yes | Yes |
| AM/FM Radio | Yes | Yes |
| CD Player | Yes | Yes |
| DVD Player | No | No |
| MP3 Playback | Yes | Yes |
| iPod Support | No | No |
| SD Card Slot | No | No |
| Lighting | ||
| Headlights | Halogen | Halogen |
| Fog Lights | Yes | Yes |
| Daytime Running Lights | No | No |
Suzuki APV Type II SGX AT (2015) vs Toyota Vios 1.3 E MT (2016): which should you buy?
For a Filipino buyer looking for the most practical and economical choice, the Toyota Vios 1.3 E MT is the better pick. It comes in at ₱791,000 versus the Suzuki APV’s ₱820,000, offering a lower price and a more modern 1.3‑liter DOHC engine that delivers 99 PS at 6000 rpm, slightly higher than the APV’s 91 PS. The Vios also has a more efficient 5‑speed manual transmission, front‑wheel drive and a unibody construction that typically yields better handling for city driving. Its 2+3 seating layout fits a typical family or commuter group, while the APV’s 2+2+3 MPV layout is less practical for everyday use and its body‑on‑frame design adds weight. Both vehicles share the same 100,000 km/3‑year warranty and are similarly sized (Vios 4410 mm vs. APV 4230 mm). If you need a compact sedan with better power and lower cost, choose the Vios; if you specifically want an MPV‑style layout for extra rear seats and can afford the higher price, the APV is an option but it’s discontinued and may be harder to find.
Frequently asked questions
Which car is cheaper?
The Toyota Vios 1.3 E MT costs ₱791,000, while the Suzuki APV Type II SGX AT is priced at ₱820,000.
Which car has more power?
The Vios’s 1.3‑liter engine produces 99 PS at 6000 rpm, higher than the APV’s 91 PS at 5750 rpm.
Which car is better for daily commuting?
The Vios, with its 5‑speed manual transmission, front‑wheel drive and unibody construction, offers better handling for city driving compared to the APV’s 4‑speed automatic and body‑on‑frame design.
Which car offers more seating?
The APV provides a 2+2+3 seating arrangement (seven seats total), while the Vios offers a 2+3 layout for five passengers.